How to Vote Fraudulently in a Voter ID State

No, I shouldn’t be revealing this information, but if it helps to illustrate how weak so-called “voter ID” law enforcement is, so be it.

Voter ID States

The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) has identified 36 states that presently have some type of “voter ID” requirement, in which the strictest states require a government-issued photo ID.

And this number is increasing. In June, Nebraska approved Legislative Bill 514 which implements voter ID requirements for Nebraska elections beginning in May 2024. Nebraska will be a “strict” voter ID state.

As the NCSL states:

Proponents argue increasing identification requirements can prevent in-person voter impersonation and increase public confidence in the election process. 

From https://www.ncsl.org/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id

The exact IDs that are required vary from state to state, but all states accept a state-issued driver’s license or other state ID (REAL ID or not) as an acceptable form of identification for voting.

Sounds great, right?

But there’s a problem.

Making and detecting fake IDs

    I hope you’re sitting down for this.

    People create fake driver’s licenses.

    This wouldn’t be mistaken for a real driver’s license. At least I hope not. But other fake driver’s licenses are more sophisticated. From https://www.etsy.com/listing/1511398513/editable-little-drivers-license

    These range from the novelty types of driver’s licenses pictured above to ones that are more sophisticated.

    From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYciy7UL2Cc

    Of course, there are ways to detect fake driver’s licenses.

    Transportation Security Administration Checkpoint at John Glenn Columbus International Airport. By Michael Ball – Own work, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=77279000
    • When you present your ID to a Transportation Security Agency official, they place the ID in a specialized machine which, among other things, can detect forgeries.
    • And if you win money at a Las Vegas casino, they will check your ID also before paying out (as an underage friend of mine learned the hard way).

    How can YOU detect a fake ID? Well, you can buy a book such as the “I.D. Checking Guide” or similar reference and compare the presented ID to the examples in the book.

    There are more robust ways to detect a fake ID. Nametag has five suggestions:

    1. Check the hologram. You can do this without using any special tools, so it’s an easy way to spot a fake ID…unless the fraudster has placed a hologram on their document.
    2. Check for tampering. Sometimes this is obvious to the naked eye, sometimes not so obvious. For example, a fraudster may have clumsily pasted another photo on top of the real photo. But maybe the tampering isn’t so obvious.
    3. Inspect the microprint. You’ll need a magnifying glass for this, but if you know what to look for, you can spot fraudulent IDs…unless the fraudster also added the appropriate microprinting to their document.
    4. Look for ultraviolet (UV) features. You’ll need a UV light for this, but again this can reveal forgeries…unless the fraudster also incorporated UV features into their document.
    5. Use Nametag products. These (and similar products from other companies such as Regula) can check for fraud that the untrained eye cannot detect.

    These fraud detection techniques are great if you work for the TSA or a casino full-time and have the appropriate training and equipment to detect fake IDs.

    Enter the untrained, unequipped fraud guardians

    But what about precinct workers?

    They work one or maybe a few days a year, and it’s very doubtful that the elections authorities:

    • Train and test precinct workers in the detection of fraudulent IDs.
    • Provide precinct workers with reference materials, magnifiying glasses, ultraviolet lights, or automated hardware and software to detect fraudulent IDs.

    If the precinct workers don’t have the training, equipment, and software, Phineas T. Bailey could walk up to a local precinct, show a fake ID saying that he is Joe Real, and if Joe Real is registered to vote in that precinct, Phineas can go ahead and vote.

    Some security.

    But no one would ever vote with a fake ID…would they?

    “But John,” you say. “No one would ever create a fake ID and use it to vote.”

    Well, let’s look at this ID.

    John Wahl’s Regional Press Secretary identification. From https://www.al.com/news/2022/10/alabama-gop-chairman-made-the-photo-id-he-used-to-vote.html

    On at least two occasions, John Wahl presented the ID above when voting.

    When poll workers asked Alabama GOP Chairman John Wahl for his voter ID, he gave them a card they’d never seen before. He texted this picture of it to the Limestone County Probate judge, who then approved him to vote.

    From https://www.al.com/news/2022/10/alabama-gop-chairman-made-the-photo-id-he-used-to-vote.html

    However, it was subsequently discovered that Wahl made the ID himself.

    (Why? Because Wahl and other members of his family object to biometric identification for religious reasons. Rather than submitting to the standard biometric identification processes used to create driver’s licenses and other government forms of identification, Wahl simply had an unnamed third party create his own ID, with the knowledge of the State Auditor.)

    This incident ended up being a little embarrassing…because John Wahl happens to head the Alabama Republican Party (as of December 2023).

    So how do you fix it?

    If you’re going to insist that people present legitimate IDs for voting, then you need to enforce it, both for people who present IDs in person and for people who present IDs remotely. There are a number of companies that provide hardware and software to verify the legitimacy of driver’s licenses and other government-issued documents.

    Of course, that costs money. Depending upon the solution you choose, it could cost tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to protect the more than 230,000 polling places from identity fraud.

    And some argue that there’s no need to spend a lot of money on this, because voting fraud isn’t a real problem. Even the Heritage Foundation’s 2020 report of “1,285 proven cases of voter fraud” looks a little less dramatic when you consider that there were 161,420,000 registered voters in the United States in 2022. So even if there were, let’s say, 11,000 proven cases of voter fraud, that’s only 0.007% of the total electorate.

    But for now, if you want to vote fraudulently, vote away.

    The Imperfect Way to Enforce New York’s Child Data Protection Act

    It’s often good to use emotion in your marketing.

    For example, when biometric companies want to justify the use of their technology, they have found that it is very effective to position biometrics as a way to combat sex trafficking.

    Similarly, moves to rein in social media are positioned as a way to preserve mental health.

    By Marc NL at English Wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2747237

    Now that’s a not-so-pretty picture, but it effectively speaks to emotions.

    “If poor vulnerable children are exposed to addictive, uncontrolled social media, YOUR child may end up in a straitjacket!”

    In New York state, four government officials have declared that the ONLY way to preserve the mental health of underage social media users is via two bills, one of which is the “New York Child Data Protection Act.”

    But there is a challenge to enforce ALL of the bill’s provisions…and only one way to solve it. An imperfect way—age estimation.

    This post only briefly addresses the alleged mental health issues of social media before plunging into one of the two proposed bills to solve the problem. It then examines a potentially unenforceable part of the bill and a possible solution.

    Does social media make children sick?

    Letitia “Tish” James is the 67th Attorney General for the state of New York. From https://ag.ny.gov/about/meet-letitia-james

    On October 11, a host of New York State government officials, led by New York State Attorney General Letitia James, jointly issued a release with the title “Attorney General James, Governor Hochul, Senator Gounardes, and Assemblymember Rozic Take Action to Protect Children Online.”

    Because they want to protect the poor vulnerable children.

    By Paolo Monti – Available in the BEIC digital library and uploaded in partnership with BEIC Foundation.The image comes from the Fondo Paolo Monti, owned by BEIC and located in the Civico Archivio Fotografico of Milan., CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=48057924

    And because the major U.S. social media companies are headquartered in California. But I digress.

    So why do they say that children need protection?

    Recent research has shown devastating mental health effects associated with children and young adults’ social media use, including increased rates of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and self-harm. The advent of dangerous, viral ‘challenges’ being promoted through social media has further endangered children and young adults.

    From https://ag.ny.gov/child-online-safety

    Of course one can also argue that social media is harmful to adults, but the New Yorkers aren’t going to go that far.

    So they are just going to protect the poor vulnerable children.

    CC BY-SA 4.0.

    This post isn’t going to deeply analyze one of the two bills the quartet have championed, but I will briefly mention that bill now.

    • The “Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act” (S7694/A8148) defines “addictive feeds” as those that are arranged by a social media platform’s algorithm to maximize the platform’s use.
    • Those of us who are flat-out elderly vaguely recall that this replaced the former “chronological feed” in which the most recent content appeared first, and you had to scroll down to see that really cool post from two days ago. New York wants the chronological feed to be the default for social media users under 18.
    • The bill also proposes to limit under 18 access to social media without parental consent, especially between midnight and 6:00 am.
    • And those who love Illinois BIPA will be pleased to know that the bill allows parents (and their lawyers) to sue for damages.

    Previous efforts to control underage use of social media have faced legal scrutinity, but since Attorney General James has sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution, presumably she has thought about all this.

    Enough about SAFE for Kids. Let’s look at the other bill.

    The New York Child Data Protection Act

    The second bill, and the one that concerns me, is the “New York Child Data Protection Act” (S7695/A8149). Here is how the quartet describes how this bill will protect the poor vulnerable children.

    CC BY-SA 4.0.

    With few privacy protections in place for minors online, children are vulnerable to having their location and other personal data tracked and shared with third parties. To protect children’s privacy, the New York Child Data Protection Act will prohibit all online sites from collecting, using, sharing, or selling personal data of anyone under the age of 18 for the purposes of advertising, unless they receive informed consent or unless doing so is strictly necessary for the purpose of the website. For users under 13, this informed consent must come from a parent.

    From https://ag.ny.gov/child-online-safety

    And again, this bill provides a BIPA-like mechanism for parents or guardians (and their lawyers) to sue for damages.

    But let’s dig into the details. With apologies to the New York State Assembly, I’m going to dig into the Senate version of the bill (S7695). Bear in mind that this bill could be amended after I post this, and some of the portions that I cite could change.

    The “definitions” section of the bill includes the following:

    “MINOR” SHALL MEAN A NATURAL PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN.

    From https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S7695, § 899-EE, 2.

    This only applies to natural persons. So the bots are safe, regardless of age.

    Speaking of age, the age of 18 isn’t the only age referenced in the bill. Here’s a part of the “privacy protection by default” section:

    § 899-FF. PRIVACY PROTECTION BY DEFAULT.

    1. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR IN SUBDIVISION SIX OF THIS SECTION AND SECTION EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY-NINE-JJ OF THIS ARTICLE, AN OPERATOR SHALL NOT PROCESS, OR ALLOW A THIRD PARTY TO PROCESS, THE PERSONAL DATA OF A COVERED USER COLLECTED THROUGH THE USE OF A WEBSITE, ONLINE SERVICE, ONLINE APPLICATION, MOBILE APPLICA- TION, OR CONNECTED DEVICE UNLESS AND TO THE EXTENT:

    (A) THE COVERED USER IS TWELVE YEARS OF AGE OR YOUNGER AND PROCESSING IS PERMITTED UNDER 15 U.S.C. § 6502 AND ITS IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS; OR

    (B) THE COVERED USER IS THIRTEEN YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER AND PROCESSING IS STRICTLY NECESSARY FOR AN ACTIVITY SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, OR INFORMED CONSENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION THREE OF THIS SECTION.

    From https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S7695

    So a lot of this bill depends upon whether a person is over or under the age of eighteen, or over or under the age of thirteen.

    And that’s a problem.

    How old are you?

    The bill needs to know whether or not a person is 18 years old. And I don’t think the quartet will be satisfied with the way that alcohol websites determine whether someone is 21 years old.

    This age verification method is…not that robust.

    Attorney General James and the others would presumably prefer that the social media companies verify ages with a government-issued ID such as a state driver’s license, a state identification card, or a national passport. This is how most entities verify ages when they have to satisfy legal requirements.

    For some people, even some minors, this is not that much of a problem. Anyone who wants to drive in New York State must have a driver’s license, and you have to be at least 16 years old to get a driver’s license. Admittedly some people in the city never bother to get a driver’s license, but at some point these people will probably get a state ID card.

    You don’t need a driver’s license to ride the New York City subway, but if the guitarist wants to open a bank account for his cash it would help him prove his financial identity. By David Shankbone – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2639495
    • However, there are going to be some 17 year olds who don’t have a driver’s license, government ID or passport.
    • And some 16 year olds.
    • And once you look at younger people—15 year olds, 14 year olds, 13 year olds, 12 year olds—the chances of them having a government-issued identification document are much less.

    What are these people supposed to do? Provide a birth certificate? And how will the social media companies know if the birth certificate is legitimate?

    But there’s another way to determine ages—age estimation.

    How old are you, part 2

    As long-time readers of the Bredemarket blog know, I have struggled with the issue of age verification, especially for people who do not have driver’s licenses or other government identification. Age estimation in the absence of a government ID is still an inexact science, as even Yoti has stated.

    Our technology is accurate for 6 to 12 year olds, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.3 years, and of 1.4 years for 13 to 17 year olds. These are the two age ranges regulators focus upon to ensure that under 13s and 18s do not have access to age restricted goods and services.

    From https://www.yoti.com/wp-content/uploads/Yoti-Age-Estimation-White-Paper-March-2023.pdf

    So if a minor does not have a government ID, and the social media firm has to use age estimation to determine a minor’s age for purposes of the New York Child Data Protection Act, the following two scenarios are possible:

    • An 11 year old may be incorrectly allowed to give informed consent for purposes of the Act.
    • A 14 year old may be incorrectly denied the ability to give informed consent for purposes of the Act.

    Is age estimation “good enough for government work”?

    LLM vs. LMM (Acronyms Are Fun)

    Document processing with GPT-4V. The model’s mistake is highlighted in red. From https://huyenchip.com/2023/10/10/multimodal.html?utm_source=tldrai

    I just ran across a use of “multimodal” that has nothing to do with fingers, faces, or irises. But it has everything to do with generative AI.

    Earlier this week, Chip Huyen published “Multimodality and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)” at his website huyenchip.com. He starts as follows:

    For a long time, each ML (machine learning) model operated in one data mode – text (translation, language modeling), image (object detection, image classification), or audio (speech recognition).

    However, natural intelligence is not limited to just a single modality. Humans can read and write text. We can see images and watch videos. We listen to music to relax and watch out for strange noises to detect danger. Being able to work with multimodal data is essential for us or any AI to operate in the real world.

    From https://huyenchip.com/2023/10/10/multimodal.html?utm_source=tldrai

    As you can see from the title, Huyen uses an acronym “LMM” that is very similar to another generative AI acronym, “LLM” (large language model).

    So what’s the difference?

    Not all multimodal systems are LMMs. For example, text-to-image models like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and Dall-E are multimodal but don’t have a language model component.

    From https://huyenchip.com/2023/10/10/multimodal.html?utm_source=tldrai

    If you’re interested in delving into the topic, Huyen’s long three-part post covers the context for multimodality, the fundamentals of a multimodal system, and active research areas.

    You can find the post at https://huyenchip.com/2023/10/10/multimodal.html?utm_source=tldrai. And I guess you can figure out how I came across it.

    Android mobile driver’s licenses? It’s complicated.

    At least in the United States, the mobile driver’s license world is fragmented.

    Because driver’s license issuance in the U.S. is a state and not a federal responsibility, each state has to develop its own mobile driver’s license implementation. Subject to federal and international standards, of course.

    To date there have been two parties helping the states with this:

    • mDL vendors such as Envoc and IDEMIA, who work with the states to create mDLs.
    • Operating system vendors such as Apple and Google, who work with the states to incorporate mDLs in smartphone wallets.

    But because the Android ecosystem is more fragmented than the iOS ecosystem, we now have a third party that is involved in mDLs. In addition to mDL vendors and operating system vendors, we also have really large smartphone providers.

    Enter Samsung:

    Samsung Electronics America today announced it is bringing mobile driver’s licenses and state IDs to Samsung Wallet. Arizona and Iowa will be the first states to offer a mobile version of its driver’s license to their residents. The update expands the Samsung Wallet experience by adding a convenient and secure way to use state-issued IDs and driver’s licenses

    From https://news.samsung.com/us/samsung-idemia-bring-mobile-drivers-licenses-samsung-wallet-arizona-iowa-first-states-rollout/

    (For those who have seen prior references to Samsung in the Bredemarket blog, rest assured that this information is public and Samsung won’t get harmed if you feed it to ChatGPT or Bard or whoever.)

    In this particular case Samsung is working with IDEMIA (the mDL provider for Arizona and Iowa), but Samsung announced that it is working with other states and with the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

    While there are underlying standards (most notably ISO/IEC 18013-5, previously discussed here) that govern the implementation of mobile driver’s licenses, there is still a dizzying array of options.

    On a personal note, I’m still working on validating my driver’s license for California’s pilot mDL program. It probably didn’t help that I renewed my physical driver’s license right in the middle of the mDL validation process.

    The Secret to Beating Half of All Fortune 500 Marketers and Growing Your Business

    (Updated blog post count 10/23/2023)

    Always take advantage of your competitors’ weaknesses.

    This post describes an easy way to take advantage of your competitors. If they’re not blogging, make sure your firm is blogging. And the post provides hard numbers that demonstrate why your firm should be blogging.

    Who uses blogging?

    According to an infographic using 2017 data, 50% of the top 200 Fortune 500 companies had a public corporate blog.

    Which means that half of those companies don’t have a public corporate blog.

    The same infographic also revealed the following:

    • 86% of B2B companies are blogging. (Or, 14% are not.)
    • 68% of social media marketers use blogs in their social media strategy. (Or, 32% don’t.)
    • 45% of marketers saying blogging is the #1 most important piece of their content strategy.
    • Small businesses under 10 employees allocate 42% of their marketing budget to content marketing.

    So obviously some firms believe blogging is important, while others don’t.

    What difference does this make for your firm?

    What results do blogging companies receive?

    In my view, the figures above are way too low. 100% of all Fortune 500 companies, 100% of B2B companies should be blogging, and 100% of social media marketers should incorporate blogging.

    Why? Because blogging produces tangible results.

    Blogging produces awareness

    Blogging is an ideal way to promote awareness of your firm and its offerings. From the same infographic:

    • 77% of internet users read blogs.
    • Internet users in the US spend 3x more time on blogs than they do on email.
    • Companies who blog receive 97% more links to their websites.
    • 70% of consumers learn about a company through articles rather than ads.
    • The average company that blogs generates 55% more website visitors.

    Blogging produces leads

    Awareness is nice, but does awareness convert into leads?

    • Small businesses that blog get 126% more lead growth than those who don’t.
    • B2B marketers that use blogs get 67% more leads than those who do not.

    Blogging produces conversions

    From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8EnslW6Uao

    Getting leads from blogging is nice, but show me the money! What about conversions?

    • Marketers who have prioritized blogging are 13x more likely to enjoy positive ROI.
    • 92% of companies who blog multiple times per day have acquired a customer from their blog.

    Take a look at those last two bullets related to conversion again. Blogging is correlated with positive ROI (I won’t claim causation, but anecdotally I believe it), and blogging helps firms acquire customers. So if your firm wants to make money, get blogging.

    What should YOUR company do?

    With numbers like this, shouldn’t all companies be blogging?

    But don’t share these facts with your competitors. Keep them to yourself so that you gain a competitive advantage over them.

    Now you just need to write those blog posts.

    How can I help?

    And if you need help with the actual writing, I, John E Bredehoft of Bredemarket, can help.

    From Sandeep Kumar, A. Sony, Rahul Hooda, Yashpal Singh, in Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education | Multidisciplinary Academic Research, “Multimodal Biometric Authentication System for Automatic Certificate Generation.”
    By Unknown author – postcard, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7691878

    In most cases, I can provide your blog post via my standard package, the Bredemarket 400 Short Writing Service. I offer other packages and options if you have special needs.

    Authorize Bredemarket, Ontario California’s content marketing expert, to help your firm produce words that return results.

    Bredemarket logo

    How Unusual Gambling Portals Drive the Need for Age Verification and Estimation

    Gambling is becoming acceptable in more and more places.

    When I was young, and even when I got older, the idea of locating a pro sports team in Las Vegas, Nevada was unthinkable. In the last few years, that has changed dramatically.

    The Roblox “Robux” gambing lawsuit

    Well, now that gambling for adults has become more and more acceptable (although adults in my home state of California still can’t gamble by phone), now attention is focusing on child gambling.

    Designed by Freepik.

    And no, the kids aren’t gambling U.S. currency, according to TechCrunch.

    In a new class action lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California this week, two parents accuse Roblox of illegally facilitating child gambling.

    While gambling is not allowed on the platform, which hosts millions of virtual games that cater to children and teens, the lawsuit points to third-party gambling sites that invite users to play blackjack, slots, roulette and other games of chance using Roblox’s in-game currency.

    From https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/roblox-children-gambling-class-action-lawsuit-robux/?_hsmi=271025889

    But the gambling sites’ terms of service prohibit underage gambling!

    I’m not going to concentrate on Roblox here, but on the other defendants—the ones who actually operate the sites that allegedly allow child gambling.

    The lawsuit specifically names RBXFlip, Bloxflip and RBLXWild as participants in “an illegal gambling operation that is preying on children nationwide.” 

    From https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/roblox-children-gambling-class-action-lawsuit-robux/?_hsmi=271025889

    But according to Bloxflip’s Terms of Service, it’s impossible that children can be using the site, because the Terms of Service prohibit this.

    By accessing Bloxflip or using the Services, you accept and agree to our website policies, including these Terms of Service, and you certify to us that (i) you are eighteen (18) years of age or older, and are at least the age of majority in your jurisdiction, (ii) you are not a resident of Washington, (iii) you have the legal capacity to enter into and agree to these Terms of Service, (iv) you are using the Services freely, voluntarily, willingly, and for your own personal enjoyment, and (v) you will only provide accurate and complete information to us and promptly update this information as necessary to maintain its accuracy and completeness.

    From https://bloxflip.com/terms

    However, stating a minimum age in your TOS is even less effective than other common age verification methods, such as

    1. Asking your customer to check a box to say that they are over 18 years old.
    2. Asking your customer to type in their birthday.
    3. Requiring your customer to read a detailed description of IRA/401(k) funding strategies and the medical need for colonoscopies. (This would be more effective than the first two methods.)

    A better way to verify and estimate ages

    As more and more companies are realizing, however, there are other ways to measure customer ages, including a comparison of a live face with a government-issued identification card (driver’s license or passport), or the use of “age estimation” software to ensure that a 12 year old isn’t gambling. (And don’t forget that NIST will test age estimation software as part of its FATE testing.)

    Even when the kids aren’t gambling legal currency.

    Communicating How Your Firm Fights Synthetic Identities

    (Updated question count 10/23/2023)

    Does your firm fight crooks who try to fraudulently use synthetic identities? If so, how do you communicate your solution?

    This post explains what synthetic identities are (with examples), tells four ways to detect synthetic identities, and closes by providing an answer to the communication question.

    While this post is primarily intended for identity firms who can use Bredemarket’s marketing and writing services, anyone else who is interested in synthetic identities can read along.

    What are synthetic identities?

    To explain what synthetic identities are, let me start by telling you about Jason Brown.

    Jason Brown wasn’t Jason Brown

    You may not have heard of him unless you lived in Atlanta, Georgia in 2019 and lived near the apartment he rented.

    Jason Brown’s renting of an apartment isn’t all that unusual.

    If you were to visit Brown’s apartment in February 2019, you would find credit cards and financial information for Adam M. Lopez and Carlos Rivera.

    Now that’s a little unusual, especially since Lopez and Rivera never existed.

    For that matter, Jason Brown never existed either.

    Brown was synthetically created from a stolen social security number and a fake California driver’s license. The creator was a man named Corey Cato, who was engaged in massive synthetic identity fraud. If you want to talk about a case that emphasizes the importance of determining financial identity, this is it.

    A Georgia man was sentenced Sept. 1 (2022) to more than seven years in federal prison for participating in a nationwide fraud ring that used stolen social security numbers, including those belonging to children, to create synthetic identities used to open lines of credit, create shell companies, and steal nearly $2 million from financial institutions….

    Cato joined conspiracies to defraud banks and illegally possess credit cards. Cato and his co-conspirators created “synthetic identities” by combining false personal information such as fake names and dates of birth with the information of real people, such as their social security numbers. Cato and others then used the synthetic identities and fake ID documents to open bank and credit card accounts at financial institutions. Cato and his co-conspirators used the unlawfully obtained credit cards to fund their lifestyles.

    From https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/hsi-investigates-synthetic-identities-scheme-defrauded-banks-nearly-2m

    Talking about synthetic identity at Victoria Gardens

    Here’s a video that I created on Saturday that describes, at a very high level, how synthetic identities can be used fraudulently. People who live near Rancho Cucamonga, California will recognize the Victoria Gardens shopping center, proof that synthetic identity theft can occur far away from Georgia.

    From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDrSBlDJVCk

    Note that synthetic identity theft different from stealing someone else’s existing identity. In this case, a new identity is created.

    So how do you catch these fraudsters?

    Catching the identity synthesizers

    If you’re renting out an apartment, and Jason Brown shows you his driver’s license and provides his Social Security Number, how can you detect if Brown is a crook? There are four methods to verify that Jason Brown exists, and that he’s the person renting your apartment.

    Method One: Private Databases

    One way to check Jason Brown’s story is to perform credit checks and other data investigations using financial databases.

    • Did Jason Brown just spring into existence within the past year, with no earlier credit record? That seems suspicious.
    • Does Jason Brown’s credit record appear TOO clean? That seems suspicious.
    • Does Jason Brown share information such as a common social security number with other people? Are any of those other identities also fraudulent? That is DEFINITELY suspicious.

    This is one way that many firms detect synthetic identities, and for some firms it is the ONLY way they detect synthetic identities. And these firms have to tell their story to their prospects.

    If your firm offers a tool to verify identities via private databases, how do you let your prospects know the benefits of your tool, and why your solution is better than all other solutions?

    Method Two: Check That Driver’s License (or other government document)

    What about that driver’s license that Brown presented? There are a wide variety of software tools that can check the authenticity of driver’s licenses, passports, and other government-issued documents. Some of these tools existed back in 2019 when “Brown” was renting his apartment, and a number of them exist today.

    Maybe your firm has created such a tool, or uses a tool from a third party.

    If your firm offers this capability, how can your prospects learn about its benefits, and why your solution excels?

    Method Three: Check Government Databases

    Checking the authenticity of a government-issued document may not be enough, since the document itself may be legitimate, but the implied credentials may no longer be legitimate. For example, if my California driver’s license expires in 2025, but I move to Minnesota in 2023 and get a new license, my California driver’s license is no longer valid, even though I have it in my possession.

    Why not check the database of the Department of Motor Vehicles (or the equivalent in your state) to see if there is still an active driver’s license for that person?

    The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) maintains a Driver’s License Data Verification (DLDV) Service in which participating jurisdictions allow other entities to verify the license data for individuals. Your firm may be able to access the DLDV data for selected jurisdictions, providing an extra identity verification tool.

    If your firm offers this capability, how can your prospects learn where it is available, what its benefits are, and why it is an important part of your solution?

    Method Four: Conduct the “Who You Are” Test

    There is one more way to confirm that a person is real, and that is to check the person. Literally.

    If someone on a smartphone or videoconference says that they are Jason Brown, how do you know that it’s the real Jason Brown and not Jim Smith, or a previous recording or simulation of Jason Brown?

    This is where tools such as facial recognition and liveness detection come to play.

    • You can ensure that the live face matches any face on record.
    • You can also confirm that the face is truly a live face.

    In addition to these two tests, you can compare the face against the face on the presented driver’s license or passport to offer additional confirmation of true identity.

    Now some companies offer facial recognition, others offer liveness detection, others match the live face to a face on a government ID, and many companies offer two or three of these capabilities.

    One more time: if your firm offers these capabilities—either your own or someone else’s—what are the benefits of your algorithms? (For example, are they more accurate than competing algorithms? And under what conditions?) And why is your solution better than the others?

    This is for the firms who fight synthetic identities

    While most of this post is of general interest to anyone dealing with synthetic identities, this part of this post is specifically addressed to identity and biometric firms who provide synthetic identity-fighting solutions.

    When you communicate about your solutions, your communicator needs to have certain types of experience.

    • Industry experience. Perhaps you sell your identity solution to financial institutions, or educational institutions , or a host of other industries (gambling/gaming, healthcare, hospitality, retailers, or sport/concert venues, or others). You need someone with this industry experience.
    • Solution experience. Perhaps your communications require someone with 29 years of experience in identity, biometrics, and technology marketing, including experience with all five factors of authentication (and verification).
    • Communication experience. Perhaps you need to effectively communicate with your prospects in a customer focused, benefits-oriented way. (Content that is all about you and your features won’t win business.)

    Perhaps you can use Bredemarket, the identity content marketing expert. I work with you (and I have worked with others) to ensure that your content meets your awareness, consideration, and/or conversion goals.

    How can I work with you to communicate your firm’s anti-synthetic identity message? For example, I can apply my identity/biometric blog expert knowledge to create an identity blog post for your firm. Blog posts provide an immediate business impact to your firm, and are easy to reshare and repurpose. For B2B needs, LinkedIn articles provide similar benefits.

    If Bredemarket can help your firm convey your message about synthetic identity, let’s talk.

    And thirteen more things

    If you haven’t read a Bredemarket blog post before, or even if you have, you may not realize that this post is jam-packed with additional information well beyond the post itself. This post alone links to the following Bredemarket posts and other content. You may want to follow one or more of the 13 links below if you need additional information on a particular topic:

    1. Synthetic Identity video (YouTube), August 12, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDrSBlDJVCk
    2. Using “Multispectral” and “Liveness” in the Same Sentence (Bredemarket blog), June 6, 2023. https://bredemarket.com/2023/06/06/using-multispectral-and-liveness-in-the-same-sentence/
    3. Who is THE #1 NIST facial recognition vendor? (Bredemarket blog), February 23, 2022. https://bredemarket.com/2022/02/23/number1frvt/
    4. Financial Identity (Bredemarket website). https://bredemarket.com/financial-identity/
    5. Educational Identity (Bredemarket website). https://bredemarket.com/educational-identity/
    6. The five authentication factors (Bredemarket blog), March 2, 2021. https://bredemarket.com/2021/03/02/the-five-authentication-factors/
    7. Customer Focus (Bredemarket website). https://bredemarket.com/customer-focus/
    8. Benefits (Bredemarket website). https://bredemarket.com/benefits/
    9. Seven Questions Your Content Creator Should Ask You: the e-book version (Bredemarket blog and e-book), October 22, 2023. https://bredemarket.com/2023/10/22/seven-questions-your-content-creator-should-ask-you-the-e-book-version/
    10. Four Mini-Case Studies for One Inland Empire Business—My Own (Bredemarket blog and e-book), April 16, 2023. https://bredemarket.com/2023/04/16/four-mini-case-studies-for-one-inland-empire-business-my-own/
    11. Identity blog post writing (Bredemarket website). https://bredemarket.com/identity-blog-post-writing/
    12. Blog About Your Identity Firm’s Benefits Now. Why Wait? (Bredemarket blog), August 11, 2023. https://bredemarket.com/2023/08/11/blog-about-your-identity-firms-benefits-now-why-wait/
    13. Why Your Company Should Write LinkedIn Articles (Bredemarket LinkedIn article), July 31, 2023. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-your-company-should-write-linkedin-articles-bredemarket/

    That’s twelve more things than the Cupertino guys do, although my office isn’t as cool as theirs.

    Well, why not one more?

    Here’s my latest brochure for the Bredemarket 400 Short Writing Service, my standard package to create your 400 to 600 word blog posts and LinkedIn articles. Be sure to check the Bredemarket 400 Short Writing Service page for updates.

    If that doesn’t fit your needs, I have other offerings.

    Plus, I’m real. I’m not a bot.

    Catching Financial Fraudsters with Physical Evidence

    There are a variety of ways that you can catch fraudsters who try to steal someone’s financial identity, but sometimes the simple ones work best.

    The U.S. Department of Justice recently reported on a traffic stop that occurred three years ago.

    Monroe County Sheriff’s deputies found eight debit cards and three driver’s licenses belonging to other people in (Jamal Denzel) Austin’s possession during a traffic stop for reckless driving and failing to maintain lane on Jan. 19, 2020. A subsequent investigation revealed that Austin, who worked at an Atlanta club, had used two stolen identities to register two separate fictious (sic) businesses with the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office to obtain two Capital One business credit cards with credit limits of $30,000 and $20,000.

    From https://www.justice.gov/usao-mdga/pr/macon-man-sentenced-prison-resulting-identity-theft-investigation

    Three driver’s licenses? Yikes.

    The investigation, which also included participation by the United States Secret Service and other local, state, and federal agencies, also uncovered a stolen $49,000 check.

    Well, Austin lost the stolen money and his freedom. He was sentenced to 48 months in federal prison.

    Now I’ll grant the early stages of this investigation aren’t as sexy as other fraud detection methods, but it worked.

    Fraudsters, stay in your lane.

    There Are Just Five Factors of Authentication. (I want the job.)

    As some of you know, I’m seeking full-time employment after my former employer let me go in late May. As part of my job search, I was recently invited to a second interview for a company in my industry. Before that interview, I made an important decision about how I was going to present myself.

    If you’ve read any of Bredemarket’s content, there are times when it takes a light tone, in which wildebeests roam the earth while engaging in marketing activities such as elaborating the benefits of crossing the stream.

    By Danijel Mihajlovic – https://thenextcrossing.com/wildebeest-migration-kenya, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=96024366

    Some of that DOES NOT fly in the corporate world. (For most companies, anyway.) If you analyze a wide selection of corporate blogs, you won’t see the word “nothingburger.” But you do here.

    So as I prepared for this important job interview, I made sure that I was ready to discuss the five factors of authentication, and my deep experience as an identity content marketing expert with many of those factors.

    The five factors of authentication, of course, are:

    • Something you know.
    • Something you have.
    • Something you are.
    • Something you do.
    • Somewhere you are.

    “But wait a minute,” some of you are saying. “Didn’t you just say that there is a sixth factor of authentication, ‘Somewhat you why?'”

    For the purposes of this job interview, there isn’t! I confined myself to the five factors only during the discussion, using examples such as passwords, driver’s licenses, faces, actions, and smartphone geolocation information.

    But in the end, my caution was of no avail. I DIDN’T make it to the next stage of interviews.

    Maybe I SHOULD have mentioned “Somewhat you why” after all.

    Bredemarket’s Name for the Sixth Factor of Authentication

    Depending upon whom you ask, there are either three or five factors of authentication.

    Unless you ask me.

    I say that there are six.

    Let me explain.

    First I’ll discuss what factors of authentication are, then I’ll talk about the three factor and five factor school, then I’ll briefly review my thoughts on the sixth factor—now that I know what I’ll call it.

    What are factors of authentication?

    Before proceeding to factors of authentication, let’s review TechTarget’s definition of authentication.

    Authentication is the process of determining whether someone or something is, in fact, who or what it says it is.

    From https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/authentication

    For purposes of this post I’m going to stay away from the “something” part and concentrate on the “someone” part.

    For example, if Warren Buffett has a bank account, and I claim that I am Warren Buffett and am entitled to take money from that bank account, I must complete an authentication process to determine whether I am entitled to Warren Buffett’s money. (Spoiler alert: I’m not.)

    So how do I authenticate? There are many different ways to authenticate, which can be grouped into several authentication factors. Here’s how Sumo Logic defines “authentication factor.”

    An authentication factor is a special category of security credential that is used to verify the identity and authorization of a user attempting to gain access, send communications, or request data from a secured network, system or application….Each authentication factor represents a category of security controls of the same type. 

    From https://www.sumologic.com/glossary/authentication-factor/

    When considering authentication factors, the whole group/category/type definition is important. For example, while a certain system may require both a 12-character password and a 4-digit personal identification number (PIN), these are pretty much the same type of authentication. It’s just that the password is longer than the PIN. From a security perspective, you don’t gain a lot by requiring both a password and a PIN. You would gain more by choosing a type of authentication that is substantially different from passwords and PIN.

    How many factors of authentication are there?

    So how do we define the factors of authentication? Different people have different definitions.

    Three factors of authentication

    For the most part, I believe that everyone agrees on at least three factors of authentication. As I noted in a prior post on factors of authentication, NIST defines the following three factors:

    Factors include: (i) something you know (e.g. password/personal identification number (PIN)); (ii) something you have (e.g., cryptographic identification device, token); or (iii) something you are (e.g., biometric).

    From https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/Multi_Factor_Authentication, cited in https://bredemarket.com/2022/03/19/remember-the-newer-factors-of-authentication/

    Note that NIST’s three factors are very different from one another. Knowing something (such as a password or a PIN) differs from having something (such as a driver’s license) or being something (a fingerprint or a face).

    But some people believe that there are more than three factors of authentication.

    Five factors of authentication

    Let’s add two factors to the definition trumpeted by NIST. People such as The Cybersecurity Man have included all five in their definition.

    • Something you know.
    • Something you have.
    • Something you are.
    • Something you do.
    • Somewhere you are.

    For more information, see my March 2021 post on the five factors of authentication.

    But are there only five?

    Six factors of authentication

    In April 2022, I began wondering if there is a sixth authentication factor. While I struggled to put it into the “some xxx you xxx” format, I was able to encapsulate what this sixth factor was.

    What about the authentication factor “why”?

    This proposed factor, separate from the other factors, applies a test of intent or reasonableness to any identification request.

    From https://bredemarket.com/2022/04/12/the-sixth-factor-of-multi-factor-authentication-you-heard-it-here-first/
    Why is this man smoking a cigarette outdoors? By Marek Slusarczyk, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=108924712

    Over the months, I struggled through some examples of the “why” factor.

    • Why is a person using a credit card at a McDonald’s in Atlantic City? (Link) Or, was the credit card stolen, or was it being used legitimately?
    • Why is a person boarding a bus? (Link) Or, was the bus pass stolen, or was it being used legitimately?
    • Why is a person standing outside a corporate office with a laptop and monitor? (Link) Or, is there a legitimate reason for an ex-employee to gain access to the corporate office?

    As I refined my thinking, I came to the conclusion that “why” is a reasonable factor of authentication, and that this was separate from the other authentication factors (such as “something you do”).

    And the sixth factor of authentication is called…

    You’ll recall that I wanted to cast this sixth authentication factor into the “some xxx you xxx” format.

    So, as of today, here is the official Bredemarket list of the six factors of authentication:

    • Something you know.
    • Something you have.
    • Something you are.
    • Something you do.
    • Somewhere you are.

    (Drumroll…)

    • Somewhat you why.

    Yes, the name of this factor stands out from the others like a sore thumb (probably a loop).

    However, the performance of this factor stands out from the others. If we can develop algorithms that accurately measure the “why” reasonableness of something as a way to authenticate identity, then our authentication capabilities will become much more powerful.