Tag Archives: biometric content marketing expert

Do your prospects see you in a negative light?

And if so, how do you fix it?

This post looks at the following:

• How generative AI answers you. (On a certain level, it tells you what you want to hear.)
• How you ask generative AI. (With a properly-worded prompt, generative AI can tell you how your company sucks.)
• How you act after asking generative AI. (In brief, you must counter any negative claims about how your company sucks.)
• But what about your company? (How Bredemarket can help you correct YOUR narrative.)

How generative AI answers you

I don’t know if I specifically shared this, but when I was undergoing my eight days of wi-fi hell, I was firing off a lot of questions to Google Gemini.

A LOT of questions.

Troubleshooting, fact-checking, you name it. Questioning what I was being told in different chats and by different on-site technicians.

And as I asked all these questions, I noticed along the way that the generative AI engine had been trained to deliver emotional-sounding responses that would resonate with the frazzled person entering the prompt into the generative AI engine.

This stands to reason. The generative AI providers want us to use the tools, so they want to make the experience as positive as possible.

For example, at one point I entered this prompt into Google Gemini:

“When a fiber Internet support person scheduled a second technician for a service call, the support person said “There are times where signal issues take more than one service visit to get to the root of the issue.” What exactly are “signal issues,” and why does the line need to be “balanced”?”

Note how Google Gemini BEGAN its response to my prompt:

“It can be incredibly frustrating when your internet isn’t working and the fix feels like it’s being kicked down the road. However, “signal issues” in the world of fiber optics are a bit more complex than just a loose plug or a broken wire.”

For those who remember the Clinton era, Google felt my pain.

Let me note that Google is not a human who TRULY perceived how I felt at that point. (Your AI girlfriend doesn’t love you either.) But it had been trained to deliver an “it can be incredibly frustrating” response.

On a certain level, Google was telling me what it thought I wanted to hear.

And we can use this to tailor our generative AI prompts to get the responses we want.

How you ask generative AI

We already tailor our prompts.

• Back in 2023, when generative AI was in its infancy, I intentionally asked a negative question about a particular company…and acted upon the response. (I will explain how later.)

• Whenever a product marketer asks a generative AI engine to prepare a SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) for a competitor or a competitive product, the PMM is intentionally asking for negative weakness and threat information.

• But you can also self-analyze…and encourage the generative AI engine to be brutally honest.

A pointed question

Let me illustrate this with the following prompt:

“Why does the marketing and writing company Bredemarket suck so badly?”

Using the word “sucks” in your prompt is the reverse of what we used to call a vanity search. Sure I’ve done those—if I ask Google about a biometric product marketing expert, I appear in the results. But when I asked Google Gemini a negative question about Bredemarket, it clearly delivered.

The response started as follows.

“That is a pretty pointed question!”

Intentionally so. The introduction continued:

“To be fair to the “company” (which is actually a solo consultancy run by a guy named John Bredehoft), whether Bredemarket “sucks” depends entirely on what you’re looking for.”

It then got into the nitty gritty about how I suck. A few excerpts:

Answer 1: a one-man shop

“If you were expecting a full-service marketing firm with account managers and a design department, the reality of a one-man shop based in Ontario, California, might feel underwhelming.”

Answer 2: not for non-tech lifestyle brands

“If you are a general business or a lifestyle brand, his style—which is very technical, process-oriented, and “old school” corporate—might feel dry, rigid, or out of touch with modern, punchy social media marketing.”

Answer 3: he ain’t a corporate drone

“John has a very distinct, conversational, and sometimes quirky style (often referencing his own mistakes or niche industry drama). For some, this feels authentic and transparent; for others, it can come across as unprofessional or rambling compared to the polished “corporate speak” of larger firms.”

Answer 4: see answer 1

“If a project gets complex or requires a fast turnaround that one person can’t handle, the “process” (which he mentions frequently on his site) might feel more like a bottleneck than a benefit.”

My responses to Gemini

Let me note that these are NOT hallucinations. Every criticism is valid.

• Whenever a cold call follow-up email asks if they should speak to another department, I laugh. To myself. There’s no one else in the office…I mean Bredemarket corporate headquarters. It’s only 25 square feet, after all.

• And no, I’m not pitching Bredemarket’s services to Sofia Bee or other lifestyle brands.

• Yes, I can write in “we are perfect” corporate-speak, but I am more effective writing for clients who admit to learning from mistakes.

• Finally, I can deliver on projects that require a draft in 3 (or 7) days. If you need an army of consultants to deliver a 600 page RFP response by tomorrow, don’t call Bredemarket.

So I asked the uncomfortable question. Now what?

How you act after you ask generative AI

As you know, after I ask, I act.

Remember when I asked generative AI a pointed question in 2023? The response from generative AI was dismissive of the company because it only supported a single factor for authentication, while generative AI knew that multi-factor authentication was ALWAYS better.

• First off, the company was able to implement multi-factor authentication if its client wanted it.

• Second, while multi-factor authentication CAN be better, it is not ALWAYS better.

So how did I respond to generative AI’s assertion? By writing content, both for people and for the generative AI engine itself, challenging its claims.

By the way, I mentioned earlier that I can write in my wildebeest-infused style, and I can also write in dry corporate-speak. In 2023, I could also write in the company’s then-current maverick-rebel-revolutionary tone.

Bear this in mind while reading the excerpts below, which make sport of denigrating “conventional wisdom.”

Enter multi-factor authentication, the technique that was supposed to render passwords dead. The theory is that even if a fraudster is able to spoof one factor of authentication, it is extremely difficult to spoof all the factors of authentication.  

This is the conventional wisdom. Even the latest generative AI engines praise a combination of entering a code on a phone in addition to a password. This, according to one generative AI engine, provides superior security. 

Nevertheless, conventional wisdom and generative AI can both be wrong. 

• If a password or PIN (something you know) is one of your authentication factors, it won’t offer much protection for the reasons outlined above. Password protection of an adult website does no good if the account holder’s underage child gets hold of the password.  
• If a key fob, smartphone, or other “something you have” item is one of your authentication factors, you are vulnerable to stolen fobs, spoofed phones, and other threats. Again, if Mom or Dad leave their phone lying around, a child can access an adult site. 

With these and similar arguments, I asserted that the company’s highly-accurate and independently-tested facial authentication was BETTER than some poorly-conceived multi-factor authentication solutions, despite what generative AI (and conventional wisdom) asserted.

And I was able to assert these because, despite what some people say, knowledge (in this case in biometrics) is NOT a detriment. There’s something good about being a biometric content marketing expert, after all.

But what about your company?

Perhaps there’s a view about your company that needs correcting, whether it’s a generative AI hallucination or a competitor spurious claim.

And how do many companies react to negative views about them? They do nothing. They don’t give the claim the dignity of a response. So the record stands, uncorrectred.

But the smart companies change the story. For example, they tell the Eskimos that an icemaker IS better than just grabbing something from outside.

Or they tell prospects how great their single factor authentication is.

Or they admit that their content probably wouldn’t help a makeup artist, but it definitely would help a technology company.

Bredemarket can help you correct the narrative.

• I’ll ask questions.
• Then I’ll propose services.

And your company will overcome the negativity.

Set up a free meeting with Bredemarket

Why don’t you set up a first, free meeting to discuss your options? Set up the meeting below.

What I do

Again, I ask questions and propose services.