Turning the Phrase

Smartphone games are not games. They are ad delivery devices. You start the app, and you see ads for other apps. You download the new apps, and the cycle continues endlessly.

So I was playing a Bitcoin-earning game (actually a Satoshi-earning game; don’t count on earning 1 Bitcoin in an hour’s worth of play) when I saw an ad for a poker game app. An update of the Yahoo! Poker games from long ago, the app screen shows five faces surrounding a poker table. Except these are not still images, but video with audio sound.

So I am watching the ad when one of the players says:

“Life is too long for bad poker hands.”

Read that again.

Life is too long?

Shouldn’t the player be saying that life is too short? The statement makes no sense the way it was said.

But sometimes a turned-around, wrongly-worded phrase is illuminating. Take the time that John F. Kennedy intentionally reversed a phrase to joke about our nation’s capital:

“Washington is a city of Southern efficiency and Northern charm.”

#honeypot79

Oops, I did it again. Because LinkedIn employment fraud persists. Let’s see if the fraudsters have become smarter since November 2024.

As previously promised and as previously executed…

I’ve spent over 10 years in identity and biometrics, and other factors, including one-to-many identification, one-to-one verification, and classification (e.g. how old you are).

But as I have noted in an old article in the Bredemarket newsletter The Wildebeest Speaks, verifying someone’s identity only goes so far.

(For people reading this on LinkedIn: here comes #honeypot79, for those paying attention.)

For example, how many LinkedIn users sporting a green banner and an #opentowork hashtag have been approached by a person claiming to be from Company X…who is NOT from Company X?

That, my friends, is #employmentfraud – something that the REAL employees at all the Company X’s out there take very seriously.

Of course, no #fraudster who is doing something like that would be foolish enough to send me a LinkedIn InMail with such a claim…would they?

Or comment on this post and make such a claim?

You’d be surprised…

#fraud
#identity
#knowyourrecruiter

(Pre-Disney image of Winnie the Pooh and his hunny pot from the https://lnkd.in/g3rmtvSQ URL)

High-Stakes Biometrics?

This amused me.

I was querying a generative AI tool on behalf of a Bredemarket client, asking a technical question about ICAO Document 9303 (the “don’t smile on your passport” document).

Google Gemini.

And the generative AI tool responded to my prompt with a reference to “high-stakes biometrics.”

I couldn’t let that one slide.

High-stakes biometrics. Google Gemini.

The Really Big Bunch Isn’t Afraid of Biometrics Any More

Are the major tech firms about to drive the relatively miniscule identity/biometric firms out of business?

Don’t be evil: stay away from surveillance

I’ve previously discussed the “big three” in biometrics: currently IDEMIA, NEC, and Thales (although IDEMIA may be replaced by Amadeus at some point). These companies are seemingly big, with billions of dollars in revenue…but they are dwarfed by the “really big bunch” of Google, Meta, and whoever else you throw in the category.

The Really Big Bunch could smash the Big Three in a heartbeat, if they wanted to.

Why haven’t they?

Because they have very active consumer sales that don’t affect IDEMIA and the like, and are terrified that any entry into biometric “surveillance” will adversely affect their lucrative consumer business. So they all concentrated on “don’t be evil.”

This is why Amazon withdrew Amazon Rekognition, Meta and others are cautious about adding facial recognition to consumer products, and Apple loudly proclaims its commitment to privacy.

But is this changing?

First, the mobile driver’s licenses

IDEMIA and Thales offer physical driver’s licenses, and moving into mobile driver’s licenses is a natural. I observed this during my time at IDEMIA, as (then) Gemalto pursued numerous mDL opportunities and IDEMIA responded in turn.

As part of my efforts to educate myself in the driver’s license market dominated by our new corporate overlords MorphoTrust, I attended an AAMVA regional conference several years ago. IDEMIA was obviously there, as was Gemalto. But also attending the conference was Apple. Why? I asked.

Apple wasn’t visible over the next few years as IDEMIA and Thales expanded their mobile driver’s license implementations. But all of a sudden, Apple was visible, as was Google, as was Samsung.

Why? Because these smartphone providers all had their own wallets, and they were adding mDLs to their offerings.

Which meant that someone who wanted a mobile driver’s license could use the convenient smartphone wallet they already had.

Were Apple and Google entering the surveillance state? Of course not, because Apple and Google were really nice people who were providing these wallets for our convenience and benefit. Never mind the facial recognition underpinning their use. There was nothing to worry about. Absolutely nothing.

Until they targeted the airports.

Second, TSA PreCheck

As a former IDEMIA employee, TSA PreCheck was near and dear to my heart. Well, until IDEMIA’s revenue tanked in 2020 when nobody flew or got driver’s licenses…and I lost my job.

But absent a worldwide pandemic, TSA PreCheck had been very very good to IDEMIA, since only IDEMIA offered it. Sure CLEAR had its program, but TSA PreCheck was much cheaper.

Until CLEAR also offered TSA PreCheck.

And Telos did also.

But who cares what these companies are doing? It’s not like a big company like Google is offering TSA PreCheck.

Fast forward to 2026.

“The Transportation Security Administration today announced a new partnership with Google Wallet, introducing a more seamless way for eligible travellers to opt in to TSA PreCheck® Touchless ID. Google Wallet is the first digital wallet to offer this innovative feature, making secure, efficient travel easier than ever.”

Yup, Google and the Department of Homeland Security are now best buddies. To some civil libertarians, this is evil indeed.

What’s next?

So how long until the really big bunch prime contracts for systems such as NGI and HART? They have a responsibility to their shareholders, after all.

Facial Recognition Motion Blur? What About Irises?

There are some interesting similarities between facial recognition and iris recognition. Scale is not one of them.

Both faces and irises recommend a minimum distance between features. While face distances vary depending upon the algorithm, some recommend a minimum 32 pixels between the eyes. For irises, John Daugman recommended an iris radius of 70 pixels.

Of course, on a human face, the real distance between eyes is much larger than the distance within a small part of an eye.

So what?

If a person’s face is moving rather than stationary, and the camera shutter speed isn’t optimized, the resulting image suffers from motion blur.

Google Gemini simulation.

Try submitting THAT to a facial recognition system. Garbage in, garbage out.

But it gets worse. What if the system in question were an iris recognition system?

Google Gemini simulation.

Compare with an excellent quality image with no blur. Yes, this is an AI simulation, but you get the idea.

Google Gemini simulation.

And that is why irises, despite their impressive accuracy, are not the best solution for all use cases. Which use case is better suited to iris matching?

Google Gemini.

One Specific Ask For Iris Firms

If you’re a marketing leader at an iris biometric firm, this video is for you.

“Locked in the Lens.” Google Lyria. Public Domain.

Do you want content, proposal, and analysis product marketing consulting with no learning curve?

Iris firm marketing leaders, visit https://bredemarket.com/mark/.

Daugman.

Afraid?

So I just checked in on a company that hasn’t posted ANYTHING on LinkedIn in three weeks.

And another that has been silent for two weeks.

If this is your company, we need to talk.

Unless you’re about to chapter out anyway.

https://bredemarket.com/mark/

Content for tech marketers.
Afraid?