I Know This “Scam of the Day”: LinkedIn Employment Scams

I read “Scam of the Day” on Scamicide…well, daily. And the January 17 edition discussed a scam I know all too well.

“A recent development is scammers using the name of legitimate companies that are hiring and approaching their victims through LinkedIn’s direct messaging feature.  They then create counterfeit websites that look like the websites of the legitimate companies they are posing as and ask the job seekers for personal information…”

And you can guess what happens with that personal information. It doesn’t land you a real job, that’s for sure.

In addition to the tips that Scamicide provides, I have an additional one. BEFORE you provide your resume, before you send them a connection request, or definitely before you engage on Telegram or WhatsApp, ask this question:

“Can you provide me with your corporate email address?”

This usually shuts scammers up very quickly.

But don’t forget that while job applicants are avoiding fraudulent employers, legitimate employers are avoiding fraudulent applicants…perhaps from North Korea.

On Acquired Identities

Most of my discussions regarding identity assume the REAL identity of a person.

But what if someone acquires the identity of another? For example, when the late Steve Bridges impersonated George W. Bush?

White House photo by Kimberlee Hewitt – whitehouse.gov, President George W. Bush and comedian Steve Bridges, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3052515

Or better still, what when multiple people adopt an identity?

Google Gemini.

And by the way, Charlie Chaplin said that he NEVER entered a Charlie Chaplin lookalike contest…and came in third.

Grok.

Of course, these assumed identities require alterations that liveness detection should detect.

As a biometric product marketing expert should know.

Landscape.

Singer/songwriters…and Deepfakes

I was just talking about singers, songwriters, and one singer who pretended to be a songwriter.

Of course, some musicians can be both.

Willie Nelson has written songs for others, sung songs written by others, and sung his own songs.

But despite the Grok deepfake I shared last October, Willie is not known as a rapper.

This is fake. Grok.

Mutable Attributes to Identity, Straight From the Music World

Each person has certain immutable attributes associated with them, such as their blood type. And other attributes, such as their fingerprints and iris characteristics, which are mostly immutable. (Although I defy anyone to change their irises.)

But other things associated with us are all too mutable. If we use these for identification, we’ll end up in trouble.

Elvis Presley, songwriter?

Let’s take one of the many attributes associated with Elvis Presley. If you haven’t heard of Presley, he was a popular singer in the mid 20th century. He’s even in Britannica.

(As a point of clarification, the song “Radio Radio” is associated with a DIFFERENT Elvis.)

Among many other songs, Presley is associated with the song “Don’t Be Cruel.”

Elvis Presley.

Presley was not only the performer, but also the credited co-songwriter.

After all, that’s what BMI says when you search its Songview database. See BMI work ID 317493.

So if BMI says Presley co-wrote it, it must be true. Right?

Um, no. In reality, the song was written by Otis Blackwell alone.

So what’s the deal? The deal was this:

“…he listened to a selection of acetate demos provided by Freddy Bienstock, the new song representative assigned to Elvis by his publishers, Hill and Range. He chose “Don’t Be Cruel” by an obscure Brooklyn-born r&b singer and songwriter, Otis Blackwell. As per Hill and Range’s contractual requirement, it came with the assignment of half the publishing to Elvis Presley Music and half the writer’s share to Elvis Presley, but as Blackwell, the first of Elvis’ great “contract” writers, was always quick to point out, it was the best deal he ever made.”

Elvis Presley and manager Colonel Tom Parker. By Unknown author – eBay, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=46927835. Parker’s real name was Andreas Cornelis van Kuijk, but that’s an entirely different identity story.

Many songs are credited to Presley as a songwriter, but in reality he wrote few if any of them. Yet the “songwriter” attribute is assigned to him. Do we simply accept what BMI says and move on?

But there are other instances in which there are no back room deals, yet a song is strongly associated with a musical entity who never wrote it.

George Jones, not a songwriter

Take BMI Work ID 542061. The credited songwriters for this particular song are Robert Valentine Braddock and Claude Putnam, more commonly known as Bobby Braddock and Curly Putnam. According to RolandNote, Braddock and Putnam began writing this song on March 4, 1977 and finished it on October 18, 1977.

It was recorded by Johnny Russell on either March 7, 1978 (RolandNote), or January 18, 1979 (Second Hand Songs), or both (Classic Country Music Stories). But no recording was released.

Then George Jones recorded the song on February 6, 1980 with subsequent overdubs (“You know she came to see him one last time”) when he was more sober. His reaction?

“I looked [producer] Billy [Sherrill] square in the eye and said ‘nobody’s gonna buy that thing, it’s too morbid.’”

And morbid it was. Although popular music in general and country music in particular has never shied away from morbid songs.

Released the next month on March 18, the song was never associated with Braddock, Putnam, Russell, or Sherrill ever again. “He Stopped Loving Her Today” is completely associated with George Jones.

George Jones 1980 album I Am What I Am. Epic Records / Legacy Recordings., Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17011344.

I am moved by the lyrical and emotional build-up, beginning with the very first line.

He said, “I’ll love you ’til I die”

After additional lines regarding a man’s unrequited love, the narrator enters the picture.

I went to see him just today
Oh but I didn’t see no tears
All dressed up to go away
First time I’d seen him smile in years

As for what happened next…listen to the song.

George Jones.

The bridge

Now there’s a particular article that I wrote for a Bredemarket client a couple of years ago that used a slow reveal “reverse timeline” effect. Starting with 2022 and moving back in time to 2019, I slowly dropped the details about a missing person who was identified via biometric technology, finally solving the mystery of the person’s identity (Connerjack Oswalt).

But I’m no Braddock/Putnam.

And I’m no George Jones.

Identity for Rent: Gig Economies and Elsewhere

Remember the 2023 Bianca Gonzalez Biometric Update article that I cited in my own 2023 post, “Why Age-Restricted Gig Economy Companies Need Continuous Authentication (and Liveness Detection)“?

The TL;DR…someone authenticates themselves after a delivery company request, but the actual delivery is made by a minor such as a younger brother or sister. As I noted, continuous authentication through the entire delivery process, rather than just at the beginning, nips this fraud in the bud.

By LukaszKatlewa – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=49248622.

Well, another Biometric Update article, this one by Lu-Hai Liang, revisits gig economy identity fraud.

And it introduces a new term: “ID renting.”

“A TransUnion report indicates that weak identity verification processes are leaving gig platforms, workers and consumers exposed to fraud and safety risks.

“The 2026 Gig Economy Worker Report reveals that one in four gig workers has rented or sold access to their accounts, enabling unverified individuals to perform services under their names.”

Of course ID renting is not limited to the gig economy.

Google Gemini.

The whole “money mule” effort is designed to obfuscate the original seller of goods by inserting an intermediary, with the intermediary’s rented identification the ID of record.

Whenever you let someone borrow your identity, you’re endangering everyone.

But there are ways to stop this. If your company offers such a solution, Bredemarket can help you publicize it. Talk to me.

And in case you’re wondering, yes I do my own work.

Offboarding: What Else Happens When You Stop Doing Business with Bredemarket?

My 2024 offboarding post discussed the short-term aspects of how Bredemarket wraps up business with its clients. But it didn’t cover the long-term aspects.

What I didn’t say in 2024

You’ll recall my description of the end of a particular contract.

In 2023 I signed a contract with a client in which I would bill them at an hourly rate. This was a short-term contract, but it was subsequently renewed.

Recently the client chose not to renew the contract for another extended period.

But there’s one thing I didn’t say.

The client (whom I’ll call Client 1) failed to tell me that it wasn’t renewing my contract. In fact, in my last discussion with the client, I did not perceive that it wasn’t planning to renew.

Surprise! In fact, I learned of the non-renewal from a third party, not the client itself.

Of course, the client had every right to choose not to renew without advance notice.

But read on.

What happened in 2025

Contrast that with my relationship with two other existing clients, both of whom contacted me personally and let me know that they weren’t renewing my contract.

Both took the time to explain why they were not renewing. Nothing to do with my performance, but having to do with internal issues at each company (which I am not at liberty to discuss).

I went through the aforementioned data scrub process with both clients, and my obligation to both was done.

But read on.

Two little twists

Add these facts.

  • There was an interesting connection between Client 2 and Client 3. My primary employee contact at Client 2 was previously a consultant at Client 3 until they were let go (again, not because of performance, but because of internal issues).
  • And a little while later, my employee contact at Client 2 was let go from Client 2 themselves (again, internal issues).

The long term

Bredemarket completed its contractual obligations to all three firms: the one that let me go in 2024 (Client 1), and the two that let me go in 2025 (Client 2 and Client 3).

But what happens after that?

It depends.

  • If my employee contact at Client 3 requests help, or if I see something of interest to Client 3, I’ll be more than happy to help or share.
  • If my employee contact formerly of Client 2 requests help, or if I see something of interest to Client 2, I’ll be more than happy to help or share.
  • If I see something of interest that affects Client 2, I may or may not share.
  • If I see something of interest that affects Client 1, I probably won’t share…except to Client 1’s competitors.

Actions, and inactions, have consequences.

And because I neglected to put any Doors references in this post like I did with the last one, I’ll close with this mind-boggling remix.

“Riders On The Storm (Fredwreck Remix).” Snoop Dogg featuring the Doors.

For My U.S. Readers Interested in Visiting Uzbekistan

When using your passport to travel internationally, sometimes you need a visa to enter a country.

And sometimes you don’t.

“The country of Uzbekistan will lift visa requirements for U.S. travelers starting Jan. 1, 2026, offering Americans another country to visit visa-free. The police change, which was recently confirmed by the government, will allow U.S. citizens to enter visa-free for up to 30 days.”

Just don’t bring your surfboards. Uzbekistan is double-landlocked.

Surfin’ Identity

Imagine if Capitol Records employed age verification in 1963.

Some musicians reach superstardom in their early 20s, feeling tremendous pressure at a young age. 

But sometimes they’re younger: when “Surfin’ U.S.A.” hit number 3 on Billboard and Cash Box, surf guitarists Carl Wilson and (soon to depart) David Marks were 16 and 14, respectively.

Of course, Capitol Records would face a bigger problem—Know Your Composer. Brian Wilson did not write the song alone.