Tag Archives: competitive analysis

How to Prepare for Your 30 Minute Meeting With Bredemarket

You are the CMO, marketing leader, or other leader at an identity, biometric, or technology firm.

You’ve made the decision to work with Bredemarket to create your content, proposal, or analysis.

You’ve gone to the https://bredemarket.com/cpa/ page and scheduled a “Free 30 minute content needs assessment” with me on my Calendly calendar. We will talk via Google Meet.

You’ve answered the preliminary questions I asked in the meeting request, including:

So…what now?

I will make it real simple. I will ask you a single simple question:

“Why?”

  • Why does your company exist, and why is it really great and why are your competitors terrible?
  • Same with your products and services. Why are they great and why are the competing ones terrible?
  • Or maybe the competitors and their products/services are great and YOURS are terrible. It’s a private call, and we can talk freely.

We have 30 minutes to chat, and at the end of that time you and I will jointly determine

  • Why we should (or should not) work together
  • How we should work together
  • What I will do, and what you will do

See you soon.

Is Your Organization (Not) Managing Your Identity Proofing Vendors?

Today I’m doing something different.

  • Normally these blog posts are addressed to Bredemarket’s PROSPECTS, the vendors who provide solutions that use biometrics or other technology. Such as identity proofing solutions.
  • But I’ve targeted this post for another audience, the organizations that BUY biometrics and technology solutions such as identity proofing solutions. Who knows? Perhaps they can use Bredemarket’s content-proposal-analysis services also. Later I will explain why you should use Bredemarket, and how you can use Bredemarket.

So if you are with an organization that SELLS identity proofing solutions, you can stop reading now. You don’t want to know what I am about to tell your prospects…or do you?

But if you BUY identity proofing, read on for some helpful expert advice from the biometric product marketing expert.

Managing an identity proofing solution

When you buy an identity proofing solution, you take on many responsibilities. While your vendor may be able to help, the ultimate responsibility remains with you.

Here are some questions you must answer:

  • What are your business goals for the project? Do you want to confirm 99.9% of all identities? Do you want to reduce fraudulent charges below $10 million? How will you measure this?
  • What are your technology goals for the project? What is your desired balance between false positives and false negatives? How will you measure this?
  • How will the project achieve legal compliance? What privacy requirements apply to your end users—even if they live outside your legal jurisdiction? Are you obtaining the required consents? Can you delete end user data upon request? Are you prepared if an Illinois lawyer sues you? Do you like prison food?
  • What about artificial intelligence? Your vendor probably uses some form of artificial intelligence. What form? What does this mean for you? Again, do you like prison food?

Again…are you ready?

GAO, IRS, and DOA

So how do other organizations manage identity proofing solutions? According to Biometric Update, not well.

A new Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit found the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has not exercised sufficient oversight of its digital identity-proofing program…

As many of you know, the IRS’ identity proofing vendor is ID.me. The GAO didn’t find any fault with ID.me. And frankly, it couldn’t…because according to the GAO, the IRS’ management of ID.me was found to be deficient.

“IRS was unable to show it had measurable goals and objectives for the program. IRS receives performance data from the vendor but did not show it independently identified outcomes it is seeking. IRS also has not shown documented procedures to routinely evaluate credential service providers’ performance. Without stronger performance reviews, IRS is hindered in its ability to take corrective actions as needed.

“ID.me acknowledges that its identity-proofing process involves the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. However, IRS has not documented these uses in its AI inventory or taken steps to comply with its own AI oversight policies. Doing so would provide greater assurance that taxpayers’ rights are protected and that the technologies are accurate, reliable, effective, and transparent.”

So while ID.me meets the IRS’ key requirement of Identity Assurance Level 2 (IAL 2) compliance, is it performing well? The IRS needs to define what “performing well” means.

You would think the IRS had a process for this…but apparently it doesn’t.

Dead on arrival (DOA).

But I’m not the IRS!

I’ll grant that you’re not the IRS. But is your identity proofing program management better…or worse?

Do you know what questions to ask?

Let Bredemarket ask you some questions. Perhaps these can help you create relevant external and internal content (I’ve created over 22 types of content), manage an RFP proposal process, or analyze your industry, company, or competitors.

Let’s set up a free 30-minute consultation to assess your needs.

CPA

Ubiquity Via Focus…On Where?

So Bredemarket’s talking about “ubiquity via focus”?

Focus on where?

On the Bredemarket blog, your source for the latest identity/biometric and technology news.

And your source for the most up-to-date information on Bredemarket’s content-proposal-analysis services.

Be sure to visit https://bredemarket.com/blog/

Or better yet, subscribe at https://bredemarket.com/subscribe-to-bredemarket/

Ubiquity Via Focus

Well, that’s done and over with.

So let’s move forward with the third year of the revived Bredemarket.

In case you missed it, Bredemarket provides content-proposal-analysis services for identity/biometric and technology firms by means of standard writing offerings.

And Bredemarket will improve its capabilities to serve you…by the means of ubiquity via focus.

No, Bredemarket isn’t ready to reveal what “ubiquity via focus” is yet…but I think you’ll figure it out.

Ubiquity Via Focus.

Who Runs Your Company’s Marketing?

I found an open marketing position at Company X. 

Why was I looking at Company X?

Because I knew two people (long gone) at Company X, so the company came to mind.

Who runs marketing at Company X?

Because the open position was not an executive position, I searched LinkedIn for the company’s Chief Marketing Officer, or what the cool kids call the CMO. Anyone applying for the open position would want to talk to the CMO.

But I found:

  • No CMO on LinkedIn.
  • No Head of Marketing on LinkedIn.
  • No marketing head on Company X’s About Us page.
CMO-less.

But they’re hiring…a marketing manager.

Normally companies hire a marketing head, then let them build out their team. But in this case, Company X is starting in the middle by hiring a non-executive marketing manager.

Or maybe not. 

The CxxO and double duty

There’s a chance that one of the other executives at Company X is wearing the marketing hat, in addition to their other duties. 

This isn’t unusual in small startups, after all.

CxxO.

Now this makes it difficult for people outside the company who want to speak to the marketing head.

But who cares if it’s difficult for outsiders?

  • Yes it makes it hard for a marketing jobseeker to determine who the hiring authority is for an open marketing position.
  • And yes (because this blog is all about me) it makes it difficult for a product marketing consultant to pitch their services…especially when the two original contacts have left the company.

Making it hard for outsiders is actually GOOD for the company. Pesky outsiders can be pesky, especially if they’re calling at all hours and bumping their emails.

Who runs marketing at Company U?

But what’s happening on the inside of Company X, or at Company U (your company)?

  • Who determines what the marketing manager is supposed to do?
  • Who determines if the marketing manager is a success or failure?
  • Who determines the company’s marketing strategy?

And (again because this is all about me) who determines when the company needs outside consulting help, and who can answer the questions that the consultant will ask?

From the perspective of Bredemarket, I am much better off when a prospect company has a clear plan of how it can use my content-proposal-analysis services.

Does your company know what it wants to do?

(Imagen 4)

Solving Problems vs. Problem-solving

Marketers, let’s return to school and talk about the difference between solving problems and problem-solving. Afterwards we’ll go back to work.

Marchetti SP and P-S

Some time in 2008 or earlier, Carolyn Marchetti heard this:

“Problem-solving is what you do when you don’t know how to solve a problem.”

She contrasts this with solving problems, where you apply known techniques to a problem that has already been solved.

Marchetti approaches this from an education perspective, where students ideally learn solving problems AND problem-solving.

Shah SP and P-S

This distinction is not unique to Marchetti’s anonymous speaker. Sam J. Shah, also dealing with students, notes the need for problem-solving in certain scientific disciplines:

“[M]ost of the work done in fields as sterile as combinatorics or as messy as molecular biology involves navigating corridors of inquiry, trying (and often failing) to draw connections, and coming up with new lenses with which to look at problems. Frustration and dead ends are part and parcel of working in these fields.”

Bredemarket SP and P-S

We encounter these issues outside of school when we go to work.

  • For businesses, Bredemarket usually solves problems: your prospects don’t know about you, your prospects don’t know why they should care about you, your prospects lack information. There are known solutions.
  • Occasionally, Bredemarket engages in problem-solving, where there are questions without clear answers, and you and I work together to determine how to move forward.

Your company probably needs to both solve tactical problems and perform strategic problem-solving.

How?

I’ve worked on both the strategic and tactical levels. Let’s talk. https://bredemarket.com/cpa/

(Imagen 4)