Do As I Say…

I have worked with demand generation and growth marketing leader Gene Volfe, both as employees of the same company and as independent consultants working for other companies.

I asked him to review a short technology piece that I wrote, and he immediately found two gaps:

  • My piece did not explain the “why.”
  • My piece did not adequately differentiate the product in question from other products.

Hmm…if only there were things that I could read that could help me do these things.

Oh, wait…

Differentiating Your Company and Your Products/Services (April 9, 2024).

Do as I say, and not as I DON’T.

Video: Differentiating Your Company and Your Products/Services

From the video below.

Last week I prepared a presentation for a conference organizer, thinking that I would give the presentation at the conference in question. Instead, the organizer emailed the presentation slides to selected conference attendees. The attendees probably liked it that way.

But I still wanted to give the presentation.

And I also wanted to generalize the presentation so that it applied to ALL technology companies, not just the ones who were attending the conference.

So I recorded myself giving the presentation “Differentiating Your Company and Your Products/Services.” It’s ten minutes long, and you can view it now.

Differentiating Your Company and Your Products/Services (April 9, 2024)

This video obviously discusses differentiation, but also discusses customer focus as well as the seven questions your content creator should ask you before writing (including benefits and target audience). Not only are the seven questions good for creating content, but they are also good for differentiating content. (For example, why is your product/service so great while all of your competitors’ products/services suck?)

If you’re watching this video on your laptop, be sure to keep your smartphone handy because at the end of the video I display a QR code to obtain more information. Just point your phone at the QR code.

Of course, if you’re watching this video on your smartphone, you can’t read the displayed QR code. So just go to https://bredemarket.com/drive-tech/ instead.

Four Reasons Why Differentiators Fade Away

I’ve talked ad nauseum about the need for a firm to differentiate itself from its competitors. If your firm engages in “me too” marketing, prospects have no reason to choose you.

But what about companies that DO differentiate themselves…and suddenly stop doing so?

There are four reasons why companies could stop differentiating themselves:

  1. The differentiator no longer exists.
  2. The differentiator is no longer important to prospects.
  3. The market has changed and the differentiator is no longer applicable.
  4. The differentiator still exists, but the company forgot about it.

Let’s look at these in turn.

The differentiator no longer exists

Sometimes companies gain a temporary competitive advantage that disappears as other firms catch up. But more often, the company only pursues the differentiator temporarily.

 In 1985, amid anxiety about trade deficits and the loss of American manufacturing jobs, Walton launched a “Made in America” campaign that committed Wal-Mart to buying American-made products if suppliers could get within 5 percent of the price of a foreign competitor. This may have compromised the bottom line in the short term, but Walton understood the long-term benefit of convincing employees and customers that the company had a conscience as well as a calculator. 

From https://reclaimdemocracy.org/brief-history-of-walmart/.

Now some of you may not remember Walmart’s “Made in America” banners, but I can assure you they were prevalent in many Walmarts in the 1980s and 1990s. Sam Walton’s autobiography even featured the phrase.

But as time passed, Walmart stocked fewer and fewer “Made in America” items as customers valued low prices over everything else. And some of the “Made in America” banners in Walmarts in the 1990s shouldn’t have been there:

“Dateline NBC” produced an exposé on the company’s sourcing practices. Although Wal-Mart’s “Made in America” campaign was still nominally in effect, “Dateline” showed that store-level associates had posted “Made in America” signs over merchandise actually produced in far away sweatshops. This sort of exposure was new to a company that had been a press darling for many years, and Wal-Mart’s stock immediately declined by 3 percent. 

From https://reclaimdemocracy.org/brief-history-of-walmart/.

The decline was only temporary as Walmart stock bounced back. And 20 years later, the cycle would repeat as Walmart launched a similar “Made in USA” campaign in 2013, only to run into Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforcement actions two years later.

The differentiator is no longer important

The Walmart domestic production episodes illustrate something else. If Walmart wanted to, it could have persevered and bought from domestic suppliers, even if the supplier price differential was greater than 5%.

But the buying customers didn’t really care.

Affordability was much more important to buyers than U.S. job creation.

So while labor leaders, politicians, and others may have complained about Walmart’s increasing reliance on Chinese goods, the company’s customers continued to do business with Walmart, bringing profitability to the company.

And before you decry the actions of consumers who act against their national self-interest…where was YOUR phone manufactured? China? Vietnam? Unless you own a Librem 5 USA, your phone isn’t from around here. We’re all Commies.

The market has changed

Sometimes the market changes and consumers look at things a little differently.

I’ve previously told the story of Mita, and its 1980s slogan “all we make are great copiers.” In essence, Mita had to adopt this slogan because, unlike its competitors, it did NOT have a diversified portfolio.

This worked for a while…until the “document solutions” industry (copiers and everything else) embraced digital technologies. Well, Fuji-Xerox, Ricoh and Konica did. Mita didn’t, and went bankrupt.

The former Mita is now part of Kyocera Document Solutions.

And stand-alone copiers aren’t even offered.

The company forgot

Before Walmart emphasized “Made in America” products, former (and present) stand-up comedian Steve Martin was dispensing tax advice.

“Steve.. how can I be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes?” First.. get a million dollars. Now.. you say, “Steve.. what do I say to the tax man when he comes to my door and says, ‘You.. have never paid taxes’?” Two simple words. Two simple words in the English language: “I forgot!”

From https://tonynovak.com/how-to-be-a-millionaire-and-not-pay-any-taxes/.

While the IRS will not accept this defense, there are times when people, and companies, forget things.

  • I know of one company that had a clear differentiator over most of its competition: the fact that a key component of its solution was self-authored, rather than being sourced from a third party.
  • For a time, the company strongly emphasized this differentiator, casting fear, uncertainty, and doubt against its competitors who depended upon third parties for this key component.
  • But time passes, priorities change, and the company’s website now buries this differentiator on a back page…making the company sound like all its competitors.

But the company has an impressive array of features, so there’s that.

Restore your differentiators

If your differentiators have faded away, or your former differentiators are no longer important, perhaps it’s time to re-emphasize them so that your prospects have a reason to choose you.

Ask yourself questions about why your firm is great, why all the other firms suck, and what benefits (not features) your customers enjoy that the competition’s customers don’t. Only THEN can you create content (or have your content creator do it for you).

A little postscript: originally I was only going to list three items in this post, but Hana LaRock counsels against this because bots default to three-item lists (see her item 4).

Addressing “How” and “Why” in That Order

This is my last chance to squeeze in a Bredemarket blog post before the end of the month, so I’ll just recycle some thoughts that I previously posted on LinkedIn.

Based on some thoughts originally shared by Taylor “Taz” Rodriguez about the perils of “me-too” marketing.

Let’s all be unique

Steve Martin on stage in the 1970s. (And yes I used the “let’s get small” version of this image.) By Jim Summaria – WP:Contact us – Licensing, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=5578555

Years ago, Steve Martin had a routine in which he encouraged his audience to say, in unison, that they promise to be different and they promise to be unique.

Get it?

Apparently some present-day marketers don’t, according to Rodriguez.

If you want to SERIOUSLY grow a service-based company, you need to STOP with the generic social media captions!

We see it all day long, even on paid ads which is sad…

❌ “We help our clients stand out from the crowd!”

❌ “Our experienced team of _____ help to elevate your business!”

From https://www.linkedin.com/posts/madebytaz_marketingandadvertising-paidadvertising-socialmediamarketing-activity-7168953109514280960-9H1N/.

No, repeating the canned phrase about standing out from the crowd does NOT make you stand out from the crowd.

But wait. It gets worse.

The authenticity bot

When I reshared Rodriguez’s post, I wanted to illustrate it with an image that showed how many people use the phrase “stand out from the crowd.”

But while I couldn’t get that exact number on my smartphone search (a subsequent laptop search revealed 477 million search results), I got something else: Google Gemini’s experimental generative AI response to the question, bereft of irony just like everything else we’ve encountered in this exercise.

You see, according to Gemini, one way to stand out from the crowd is to “be authentic.”

Yes, Google Gemini really said that.

Google search results, including generative AI results.

Now I don’t know about a bot telling me to “be authentic.”

Rodriguez addresses “how” and “why”

Going back to Taylor “Taz” Rodriguez’s post, he had a better suggestion for marketers. Instead of using canned phrases, we should instead create original answers to these two questions:

HOW do you help your clients stand apart from the competition?

WHY have your past & current clientele chosen to work with you?

From https://www.linkedin.com/posts/madebytaz_marketingandadvertising-paidadvertising-socialmediamarketing-activity-7168953109514280960-9H1N/.

Why not “why” and “how”?

Now I know what my Bredemarket groupies are saying at this point.

Only one of these three groupies will survive. (And I shudder to think about what Bredemarket groupies would wear.) By Mike – Flickr: DSC_0657, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=26475397

(There aren’t any Bredemarket groupies, but pretend for the moment that there are.)

Taz, “You’re Doing It Wrong™.” Because Simon Sinek insists that “why” is the most important question, “why” should take precedence over “how.”

To which I respond:

Sinek Schninek.

BOTH questions are important, both need to be addressed, and it really doesn’t matter which one you address first.

In fact, there are some very good reasons to start with the “how” question in this case. It’s wonderful for the marketer to focus on the question of how they stand apart from the competition.

And as a wildebeest lover who grasps a keyboard with my cold dead hands, and with an onboarding process that ensures Bredemarket’s content is the right content for my customers, I can certainly agree with this focus.

Even if my onboarding process does start with “why.”

My “seven questions” as of January 18, 2024. To see the latest version of the e-book on my seven questions, visit https://bredemarket.com/7qs/.

But hey, if you want to address my first two questions in reverse order, go for it.

Find out more here.

The Pros and Cons of Discriminating Your Product by Quantifying Your Benefits

Some firms make claims and don’t support them, while others support their claims with quantified benefits. But does quantifying help or harm the firms that do it? This pudding post answers this question…and then twists toward the identity/biometrics market at the end.

The “me too” players in the GCP market

Whoops.

In that heading above, I made a huge mistake by introducing an acronym without explaining it. So I’d better correct my error.

GCP stands for Glowing Carbonated Pudding.

I can’t assume that you already knew this acronym, because I just made it up. But I can assure you that the GCP market is a huge market…at least in my brain. All the non-existent kids love the scientifically advanced and maximally cool pudding that glows in the dark and has tiny bubbles in it.

Glowing Carbonated Pudding. Designed by Google Bard. Yeah, Google Bard creates images now.

Now if you had studied this non-existent market like I have, you’ll realize from the outset that most of the players don’t really differentiate their offerings. Here are a few examples of firms with poor product marketing:

  • Jane Spain GCP: “Trust us to provide good GCP.”
  • Betty Brazil GCP: “Trust us to provide really good GCP.”
  • Clara Canada GCP: “Trust us to provide great GCP.”

You can probably figure out what happened here.

  • The CEO at Betty Brazil told the company’s product marketers, “Do what Jane Spain did but do it better.”
  • After that Clara Canada’s CEO commanded, “Do what Betty Brazil did but do it better.” (I’ll let you in on a little secret. Clara Canada’s original slogan refereneced “the best GCP,” but Legal shot that down.)
Designed by Google Bard.

Frankly, these pitches are as powerful as those offered by a 17x certified resume writer.

The quantified GCP

But another company, Wendy Wyoming, decided to differentiate itself, and cited independent research as its differentiator.

Wendy Wyoming Out of This World GCP satisfies you, and we have independent evidence to prove it!

The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, as part of its Pudding User Made (PUM, not FRTE) Test, confirmed that 80% of all Wendy Wyoming Out of This World GCP mixes result in pudding that both glows and is carbonated. (Mix WW3, submitted November 30, 2023; not omnigarde-003)

Treat your child to science-backed cuisine with Wendy Wyoming Out of This World GCP!Wendy Wyoming is a top tier (excluding Chinese mixes) GCP provider.

But there are other competitors…

The indirect competitor who questions the quantified benefits

There are direct competitors that provide the same product as Wendy Wyoming, Jane Spain, and everyone else.

And then there are indirect competitors who provide non-GCP alternatives that can substitute for GCPs.

For example, Polly Pennsylvania is NOT a GCP provider. It makes what the industry calls a POPS, or a Plain Old Pudding Sustenance. Polly Pennsylvania questions everything about GCP…and uses Wendy Wyoming’s own statistics against it.

Designed by Google Bard.

Fancy technologies have failed us.

If you think that one of these GCP puddings will make your family happy, think again. A leading GCP provider has publicly admitted that 1 out of every 5 children who buy a GCP won’t get a GCP. Either it won’t glow, or it’s not carbonated. Do you want to make your kid cry?

Treat your child to the same pudding that has satisfied many generations. Treat your child to Polly Pennsylvania Perfect POPS.

Pennsylvania Perfect remembers.

So who wins?

It looks like Polly Pennsylvania and Wendy Wyoming have a nasty fight on their hands. One that neck-deep marketers like to call a “war.” Except that nobody dies. (Sadly, that’s not true.)

  • Some people think that Wendy Wyoming wins because 4 out of 5 of their customers receive true GCP.
  • Others think that Polly Pennsylvaia wins because 5 out of 5 of their customers get POPS pudding.

But it’s clear who lost.

All the Jane Spains and Betty Brazils who didn’t bother to create a distinctive message.

Don’t be Jane Spain. Explain why your product is the best and all the other products aren’t.

Copying the competition doesn’t differentiate you. Trust me.

The “hungry people” (target audience) for THIS post

Oh, and if you didn’t figure it out already, this post was NOT intended for scientific pudding manufacturers. It was intended for identity/biometric firms who can use some marketing and writing help. Hence the references to NIST and the overused word “trust.”

If you’re hungry to kickstart your identity/biometric firm’s written content, click on the image below to learn about Bredemarket’s services.

Why Your 17X Certified Resume Writer Pitches Are Failing

Dear 17X Certified Resume Writer,

You may think your marketing tactics and sequence are foolproof. But they’re not. Read on to see why.

And if you’re NOT a 17x certified resume writer, skip to the bottom to see how the resume writing market lacks differentiation. But what about YOUR market?

Why your marketing tactics and sequence don’t work

From observing you and dozens of your 17x certified resume writing competitors that I’ve encountered (and over 14,000 of your competitors that I haven’t encountered), here are the marketing tactics and sequence that ALL of you are using, and why they are COMPLETELY ineffective.

  • Find a LinkedIn profile with a green “Open to Work” banner.
  • Send a message to the banner-bearer with canned phrases like “Thank you for connecting with a 17x certified resume writer,” or “May I ask what job you are seeking?” If you are using the same language as every other 17x certified resume writer out there, then the prospect has no reason to purchase YOUR services.
  • Immediately demand that the prospect provide a copy of their resume. Never mind that the prospect’s LinkedIn profile already has the same information as the resume. If you are requesting information that is already available online, then the prospect has no reason to purchase YOUR services.
  • When your qualifications as a 17x certified resume writer are challenged, respond with stupid stuff. For example, say that your services can place your prospect into LinkedIn’s top 10% of candidates for a position. If your “expert knowledge” betrays that you have NO expertise, then the prospect has no reason to purchase YOUR services.
From a LinkedIn InMail from a 17x certified resume writer.
  • When all else fails, talk about the respectability of the third-party website where you advertise your services (usually Fiverr). If you talk about Fiverr (which has over 14,000 resume writers), then the prospect has no reason to purchase YOUR services.
  • Most importantly, ensure that your pitch is the same as the pitch of your 13,999+ competitors. This is critically important—don’t provide ANY reason why your 17x resume writing services are better than those of your 13,999+ competitors. If you provide NO reason why you are better than your competition, all of whom are bombarding LinkedIn “open to work” folks with canned pitches daily, then the prospect has no reason to purchase YOUR services.

So this is why your tactics don’t work.

Why did I rewrite something that I already wrote a few weeks ago?

If you’re a regular reader of the Bredemarket blog—that’s a joke; if you haven’t read my LinkedIn profile, you certainly haven’t read the Bredemarket blog before—then you know that I recently wrote a post entitled “Five Reasons Why 17X Certified Resume Writer Pitches Fail.” It approached your marketing tactics from a different perspective.

But one afternoon when I received three separate LinkedIn InMails from three separate 17x certified resume writers in the space of five minutes, I figured that I needed to address this issue again, in a more pointed fashion. (Yes, I iterate.)

Now I don’t want you to read the entirety of my January 8 post. I know that you are very busy searching for “open to work” people to ask your canned question about their desired position. But I do suggest that you read the fourth of my five reasons why your pitches fail, and take the steps to ensure that you don’t sound exactly the same as your thousands of competitors.

Hope this helps.

That’s all I have to say. 17x certified resume writers can stop reading here.

Seriously.

Stop. Get to work.

For those of you who are NOT 17x certified resume writers

OK, time for me to talk to the rest of you. It’s just me, you, and the wildebeest.

Black wildebeest. By derekkeats – Flickr: IMG_4955_facebook, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=14620744

Frankly, I doubt that any of the 17x certified resume writers have even made it to this point of the blog post. Like I said, they’re too busy seeking their next prospects.

But the whole 17x certified resume writer market strikes me as one which is sorely lacking in differentiation, competitive analysis, and customer focus. The vast majority of people who provide resume services don’t even attempt to say why their services are superior and the services of their 13,999+ competitors are inferior. And the vast majority focus on themselves rather than the specific needs of their prospects. Why should I choose one of these 17x certified resume writers, and not one of their competitors?

But it’s not enough to take a look at a lack of differentiation in one market. Now I have to take a look at myself. Have I done an adequate job of differentiating Bredemarket’s marketing and writing services from those of my other content marketing competitors? I already know that Canva content creator G from Ray of Social is a much better singer than I am.

From “epic Western” singing to Canva queendom. Sorry, G, but this is still my favo(u)rite song. From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q04LZgFpP9Y

And perhaps you should take a look at yourself. Have you done an adequate job of differentiating YOUR company from the competition? Do your prospects have a reason to choose you?

If you are employed by a technology firm and need your content to stand out from the crowd, let me explain why Bredemarket’s services can drive content results, how I provide services that no one else does, and what we will do together to create that content your company desperately needs.

Postscript

Just in case these questions come up.

  • I have nothing against Fiverr as a platform, or against similar platforms such as Upwork. I’m sure that there are good people on Fiverr, and I don’t believe that there is a causation between people being on Fiverr and people providing bad services. But I do believe that there is a correlation between Fiverr and bad services, and that if you are on Fiverr, it is incumbent for you to prove that you are qualified to offer your services. (That goes for people like me who AREN’T on Fiverr also.)
  • In addition, I have nothing against Nigeria, or India, or any country where a service provider may reside. While the three separate InMails that I received from three separate 17x certified resume writers within five minutes were ALL from Nigeria (Anita from Abuja, Helen from Lagos State, and Renee from Akwa Ibom State), that doesn’t necessarily mean that Nigerians are bad service providers (or that people in the United States and other “first world” countries are GOOD service providers). But again a service provider’s origin is a risk factor that you may need to consider when selecting someone.
  • Well, unless they’re a rich and respectable person, like a prince, rather than some poor Fiverr user.

Explaining the Confusion of Wildebeest

I’ve been using the word “wildebeest” more often lately. In the Bredemarket blog, on Bredemarket’s LinkedIn pages, on my own LinkedIn page, and even in a job application cover letter.

For those who don’t know why I’m so hot on wildebeest, let me explain.

It all started with the dogs

When I started Bredemarket as a marketing and writing service firm, it stood to reason that I would have to market and write about Bredemarket itself.

There’s a common phrase for this practice: “eating your own dog food.”

Another John (a Mr. Carson) took “eating your own dog food” literally. From NBC. This picture from Madly Odd, https://madlyodd.com/johnny-carson-alpo-dog-food-ad/

It’s a VERY common phrase.

And that’s a problem, because people who eat their own dog food sound just like everybody else.

So I moved to iguanas

It’s important to differentiate yourself from the competition. Trust me on this.

So I stopped talking about eating my own dog food, and when I set my initial goals for 2021 in December 2020, one of my goals was “eat my own iguana food.”

But then I moved on

But for some reason the iguana emphasis left me cold, and I quietly pivoted back to mammals a little over a month later.

Black wildebeest. By derekkeats – Flickr: IMG_4955_facebook, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=14620744

Now I don’t always eat my own wildebeest food myself in this regard. I’ve previously noted that my Empoprise-NTN blog isn’t updated regularly…

From https://bredemarket.com/2021/01/25/three-ways-to-prove-to-your-customers-that-your-firm-is-an-ongoing-viable-concern/

(Which reminds me; time to update Empoprise-NTN again. If Buzztime even exists any more.)

The following month I made it official in “When wildebeests propose.”

You’ve heard the saying about eating your own dog food. That statement bored me, so I started talking about eating your own iguana food. Eventually I tired of iguanas and pivoted to wildebeests.

From https://bredemarket.com/2021/02/09/when-wildebeests-propose/

And for over 2 1/2 years I’ve continued to focus on the majestic wildebeest, both singly and in confusion (the correct term for a group of wildebeest). Let’s face it: how many other marketing and writing experts are talking about wildebeest? It’s my own little distinctive thingie.

The problem with wildebeest

But now I’m asking myself whether this is a GOOD distinction. After all, the common definition of “confusion” is NOT a positive one. Unless you’re a New Order fan.

From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_L_-CKg6pw

So perhaps I’ll retire the wildebeest for something new that more closely reflects Bredemarket’s differentiators:

I help firms win by explaining why the firm serves its customers, focusing on customer needs, and highlighting benefits.

Yes, those are the same differentiators that I currently include in my personal LinkedIn profile. But after all, Bredemarket is a one-person operation.

sin, a one-man band in New York City. By slgckgc – https://www.flickr.com/photos/slgc/8037345945/, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47370848

If you have an idea of something that is better than a dog, an iguana, or a wildebeest, post it in the comments.

When Your Firm’s Differentiation REPELS Your Customers

I constantly preach that firms should not adopt “me too” messaging. Ideally, a firm’s messaging should not copy its competitors, but should instead state why the firm is better than all others, and why all the other firms are worthless in comparison.

But when a firm differentiates itself, there is always a danger that the firm will forget one important thing: how will the customers react to the firm’s differentiated messaging? Will the differentiation turn the customers off?

Trust me, it can happen.

A multinational’s great idea that backfired

Some time ago, I was working for a multinational firm that clearly differentiated itself from all of its competitors. This multinational had been around for some time and was known for its particular tone.

I’m not going to reveal the name of the particular multinational firm, or the tone it radiated.

The IBM illustrative example

But the tone used by that multinational was just as powerful as the tone IBM exuded in the mid-20th century.

In the 1950s and 1960s, “Big Blue” meant a particular style.

The man and his machine: Thomas Watson Jr. strikes a pose to sell the System/360. From https://www.itnews.com.au/gallery/ibm-gets-hammered-inside-big-blues-huge-clearance-auction-531538

IBM acquired an image of an army of men (this was the mid-20th century, after all), all wearing blue suits and white shirts.

Even as late as the 1980s (and beyond), the men of IBM had the look:

The men of IBM didn’t wear facial hair and wore only white shirts….IBM wanted to make sure they did not offend a prospect or a customer. Research had shown them that some people don’t like facial hair…so no facial hair. Research had also shown that people assume a degree of professionalism with a white shirt that may not be assumed if a person wore a blue or yellow shirt. So white shirts it is!

From https://bulanetwork.com/4004-dont-be-offensive-ibms-white-shirt-strategy/
The look persists today. Won Sung-shik, general manager of IBM Korea (IBM Korea). From https://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20210708000919

Back to my multinational

Let’s leave the theoretical example and return to the situation at my distinctive multinational.

Now the multinational that employed me long ago didn’t have a “blue suit-white shirt” dress code, but in other ways the multinational had a distinctive tone that radiated from the executive level down to the ranks of the worker bees like myself.

  • We all embodied this tone.
  • We spoke in this tone.
  • And our marketing messages also spoke in this tone, regardless of the market segment to which our marketers were speaking.
  • Even if the market segment had a very different tone than the one the multinational was projecting. (Imagine the Military Police selling the Vietnam War in Haight-Ashbury.)
By By S.Sgt. Albert R. Simpson. Department of Defense. Department of the Army. Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations. U.S. Army Audiovisual Center. – This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required. See Commons:Licensing., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1111279

When my multinational sent its marketing collateral out to prospects who used a very different tone than that used by the multinational, the prospects hated it. The marketing department received multiple complaints from salespeople whose clients were repelled by the material.

By Mindaugas Danys from Vilnius, Lithuania, Lithuania – scream and shout, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=44907034

One of my coworkers surveyed the negative campaign reaction with dismay. The coworker had joined the company after the marketing tone was adopted. My coworker asked a simple question: “What type of customer focus group testing was conducted before we used this tone on a marketing campaign?”

“We didn’t conduct any focus group testing,” my coworker was told. “We didn’t need any.”

In retrospect, I guess we did need to test the messaging before we delivered it.

Four ways to balance customer focus and a firm’s distinctive messaging

If you’ve been reading recent Bredemarket blog posts, you’re probably not surprised that this is turning into yet another blog post about customer focus. But how do you balance a firm’s distinctive differentiators with a focus on its customers?

  1. First, you need to ensure that you are truly focusing on the customer, and not what you think the customer is. If a military police officer were to try to put himself in the shoes of a hippie to imagine what the hippie’s life was like, the MP would fail utterly.
  2. Second, you need to ensure that your messaging to the customer is something the customer cares about. It’s fine to adopt your “big blue” tone, but make sure that your messaging resonates with the customer.
  3. Third, your messaging should also explain why you do what you do. Why did IBM create System/360 computers, after all?
  4. Fourth, your messaging needs some smarts. Just because your prospect bought a refrigerator on Monday doesn’t mean that they’ll want a second refrigerator on Tuesday.

If you follow these and similar steps, then it (almost) doesn’t matter if your firm’s generic messaging is antithetical to the values of your prospects. Because your prospects won’t get generic messaging, but messaging that is focused for them.

EBM (Etowah Brunch Market), not IBM. But close enough. From https://www.instagram.com/p/Cs_m-vNOAN3/

When should you target a competitor?

Companies must choose how their marketing will address their competitors. Some choose to ignore the competition, while others publicly target them. And some companies do both simultaneously.

Trellix et al: targeting competitors

Trellix, the company that emerged from the combination of McAfee Enterprise and FireEye, chose the to target its competitors. Trellix’s website contains two pages that target two specific competitors.

  • Trellix vs. CrowdStrike claims that Trellix delivers “earlier, better protection across all phases of the attack chain.” It follows this with a comparison chart that claims security lags.
  • Trellix vs. SentinelOne makes the same claim, but with a different comparison chart that claims a lack of expertise.

For its part, CrowdStrike offers comparisons against both SentinelOne and “McAfee,” while SentinelOne offers comparisons against both CrowdStrike and “McAfee.” Apparently these firms need to update their pages to reflect the new company name (and possibly new features) of Trellix.

Obviously the endpoint protection industry demands these types of comparisons to sway buyers to choose one product over another.

Apple: targeting industry leaders (and ignoring other competitors)

But competitor targeting is also used by upcoming firms to displace established ones. I’ve previously talked about (then) Apple Computer’s famous “Welcome, IBM. Seriously” ad “welcoming” IBM to the personal computer industry. This was part of Steve Jobs’ multi-year effort to grow Apple by targeting and displacing IBM. But while IBM was the clear target, Apple also targeted everyone else, as Bill Murphy, Jr. noted:

Added benefit: There were actually other personal computer companies that were just as successful as Apple at the time, like Commodore, Tandy, and Osborne. The Apple ad ignored them.

From https://www.inc.com/bill-murphy-jr/37-years-ago-steve-jobs-ran-apples-most-amazing-ad-heres-story-its-almost-been-forgotten.html

By framing the circa 1981 computer industry as a battle between the Apple and IBM, Jobs captured the world’s attention. Not only by positioning Apple as David in a battle against Goliath, but by positioning Apple as one of only two companies that mattered. This marketing would reach its peak three years later, in 1984.

From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R706isyDrqI

When the targeter becomes the target

After 1984, the computer world changed dramatically (as it always does), with other companies creating what were then called “clones,” as well as the massive changes at both IBM and “Apple Computer” (now Apple).

Eventually, small spunky outfits challenged Apple itself, with Fortnite in particular targeting Apple’s requirement that Fortnite exclusively use Apple payments.

From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHLuKumkASg

So when should you target competitors?

The decision on whether or not to publicly acknowledge and target competitors varies depending upon a company’s culture and its market position.

  • As seen above, some markets such as the endpoint protection market demand competitor comparisons. Others (Apple 1981-1984, Fortnite 2020) target competitors to buttress their own positions. And don’t forget how Avis targeted Hertz in 1962, and Hertz subsequently responded.
  • Then again, sometimes it’s best to not acknowledge the competition. Again note that Apple only acknowledged one competitor in the early 1980s, refusing to acknowledge that the other competitors even existed.
  • In some cases, companies don’t acknowledge the competition because they don’t believe they measure up to the competition on benefits, features, or even price. For these companies, their challenge is to identify some advantage over the competition and promote that advantage, even if the relevant competitors are not explicitly mentioned.

(Bredemarket Premium) Getting competitive proposals WITHOUT submitting a FOIA request

One of the best ways to get competitive intelligence on a competitor is to request the competitor’s response to a government agency procurement, such as a proposal submitted in response to a Request for Proposal. This is done by submitting a request via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or equivalent.

One note: this technique primarily applies to government agency procurements, since governments are often required by law to disclose this information. Bids submitted to private entities usually remain private.

Of course, actually getting the competitor’s response isn’t easy.

  • First, you have to submit the request in the proper format.
  • Second, you have to be detailed in what you are requesting, and you need to request everything that you want: the actual proposal itself, any follow-up correspondence such as a best and final offer, the agency’s evaluation score, and everything else. If you only request the original proposal, the agency is only obligated to provide the original proposal, and nothing else.
  • Third, you have to wait for the agency to prepare a copy of the proposal. Depending upon applicable law, the bidder may be able to redact portions of the proposal, and it usually takes some time for the agency and the bidder to agree on what can legally be redacted.
  • Fourth, you may have to pay (usually on a per-page basis) to receive the materials.

This entire process may take several months, and you can’t even request the material until after the procurement has been awarded, or perhaps contracted.

But guess what? You don’t always have to submit a FOIA-like request to get a copy of a proposal submitted to a government agency.

By Neep at the English-language Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3309749

And no, you don’t have to break the law; these proposals (and other valuable documents) can be obtained legally and ethically.

Subscribe to get access

Read more of this content when you subscribe today.

Subscribe to Bredemarket Premium to access this premium content.

  • Subscriptions just $5 per month.
  • Access Bredemarket’s expertise without spending hundreds or thousands of dollars.