The Best Way to Talk About Complex Technology Features? Don’t.

Are you a product marketer or content marketer at an engineering-focused technology firm?

The ALMA correlator. The full system has four identical quadrants, with over 134 million processors, performing up to 17 quadrillion operations per second. By ESO – http://www.eso.org/public/images/eso1253a/, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=23340651.

Have you been asked to tell your prospects about the marvelously complex features of your firm’s dazzling engineering products?

Well…why would you want to do that?

The complex product with a lengthy feature list

Many years ago I worked at a firm in which the products were driven by engineers, and therefore resulted in engineering marvels.

Two kinds of Segway PTs. By Source: aleehk82 [1]Derivative work: 丁 (talk) – https://www.flickr.com/photos/aleehk82/3144281707/, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11852469

I recall one product in particular (not a Segway, but a biometric product housed in a tower) that was an impressive fusion of algorithmic and mechanical excellence. The complex design that went into developing the tower product resulted in a device that performed its function superbly.

The complex engineering also caused the product to have such a high price that no one would ever buy it…but I digress.

But there was another issue with the product. I was writing proposals at the time, and we certainly could have written up a product description that emphasized the product’s lengthy set of features.

But the people receiving our proposals wouldn’t have cared one bit.

Prospects don’t care about lengthy feature lists

You see, prospects don’t care about lengthy feature lists.

And they don’t care about your product.

Altair 8800 advertisement. By MITS staff – Scanned from the May 1975 Radio-Electronics magazine by Michael Holley Swtpc6800, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7219799

Frankly, they don’t even care about your company.

  • Even if your company has stellar engineers that develop wonderful products.
Elizabeth Holmes “invented a way to run 30 lab tests on only one drop of blood.” WIRED, February 2014, https://www.wired.com/2014/02/elizabeth-holmes-theranos/.
  • Even if your company has won prestigious awards for technical excellence, or as a great place to work, or whatever.
Business Week named Enron Chairman and CEO Ken Lay as one of the top 25 managers for 1999. From https://enroncorp.com/corp/pressroom/awards/executive.html
  • Even if your company just completed a successful funding round.
Transformco (post-bankruptcy parent of Sears and KMart) received $250 million in November 2019. From https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/07/sears-owner-gets-250-million-lifeline-says-it-will-shut-another-96-stores.html.

It’s painful to admit it, but prospects only care about…themselves.

And the prospects focus on their problems, not your technical superiority.

For example, if your prospects work for certain government agencies, they really care about terrorists who try to board airplanes.

Aerial view of the Pentagon Building, September 14, 2001. By TSGT CEDRIC H. RUDISILL, USAF – http://www.dodmedia.osd.mil/Assets/Still/2004/Air_Force/DF-SD-04-12734.JPEG Alternate: http://www.af.mil/News/Photos/igphoto/2001289439/ archive, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2152737

If your product stops terrorists from boarding airplanes, then and only then will they care about your company or your product.

If your product can’t stop terrorists from boarding airplanes, or if there is another product that is better at stopping terrorists from boarding airplanes, then your prospects won’t care about your product.

So how do you get prospects to care?

You don’t get prospects to care by talking about your extensive feature lists.

Let me give you a tip. If you find an employee at the prospect’s company who wants to spend a lot of time talking about your extensive feature lists, that employee probably DOESN’T have the authority to approve the purchase.

The people who DO have the authority to approve the purchase don’t have time to talk about extensive feature lists.

The approvers want to know, in 30 seconds or less, how your solution BENEFITS them.

Do you need help explaining your benefits?

Talking about benefits rather than features is just one tactic to successfully appeal to your prospects.

If you need help ensuring that your written materials (blog posts, white papers, web pages) resonate with your prospects, you can ask Bredemarket to help you.

More on the Messy Middle

I’ve previously written about the “messy middle,” or the way that people REALLY decide on what to purchase. It’s not as logical as the theories suggest.

Therefore, when Kevin Indig touched on the subject, I was naturally interested.

His article includes a section “What we missed about the Messy Middle”:

Different ways of doing SEO

Severe limitations of attribution models

The need to merge CRO and SEO

From https://www.growth-memo.com/p/messy-middle.

Kevin Indig’s article touches upon a lot of topics, most of which I won’t discuss. Read his article. Instead, I’m going to focus on the second of Indig’s three items (on attribution model limitations) because it intersects with my interests, including the trust funnel.

Surround sound

By TonyTheTiger at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10473262

Indig notes the issues with revenue attribution, and how measurements of conversion touch points often end up as wild guesses.

So he proposes something different.

Instead of trying to figure out where to be, try to be everywhere. It’s more important to understand where your competitors are, and you’re not….The surround sound approach seems intuitive but is a very different approach to what’s happening at companies today….Surround Sound doesn’t mean to do everything, but to carefully observe where competitors are and pull even.

From https://www.growth-memo.com/p/messy-middle.

At this point I only want to interject that you should also carefully observe where competitors AREN’T.

But what are the analysts going to analyze? What they can.

We should also rethink the numbers we look at. Recurring visits and the average number of visits until conversion reflect user behavior and improvements better than bounce rate or pages per visit since users hop around so much.

From https://www.growth-memo.com/p/messy-middle.

While much of the activity remains invisible to us, we can still look at the activity that we CAN see.

Some things remain secret

And yes, much of the activity does remain invisible. A former coworker messaged me on Sunday with a question, and he closed his message with the following.

Btw, enjoy your posts

From a private message.

I’m tossing that message over to Bredemarket’s chief analyst.

Doing Double Duty (from the biometric product marketing expert)

I’ve previously noted that product marketers sometimes function as de facto content marketers. I oughta know.

sin, a one-man band in New York City. By slgckgc – https://www.flickr.com/photos/slgc/8037345945/, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47370848

For example, during my most recent stint as a product marketing employee at a startup, the firm had no official content marketers, so the product marketers had to create a lot of non-product related content. So we product marketers were the de facto content marketers for the company too. (Sadly, we didn’t get two salaries for filling two roles.)

Why did the product marketers end up as content marketers? It turns out that it makes sense—after all, people who write about your product in the lower funnel stages can also write about your product in the upper funnel stages, and also can certainly write about OTHER things, such as company descriptions, speaker submissions, and speaker biographies.

From https://bredemarket.com/2023/08/28/the-22-or-more-types-of-content-that-product-marketers-create/.

That’s from my post describing the 22 (or more) types of content that product marketers create. Or the types that one product marketer in particular has created.

So it stands to reason that I am not only the biometric content marketing expert, but also the biometric product marketing expert.

I just wanted to put that on the record.

And in case you were wondering what the 22 types of content are, here is the external content:

  • Articles
  • Blog Posts (500+, including this one)
  • Briefs/Data/Literature Sheets
  • Case Studies (12+)
  • Proposals (100+)
  • Scientific Book Chapters
  • Smartphone Application Content
  • Social Media (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, TikTok, Twitter)
  • Web Page Content
  • White Papers and E-Books

And here is the internal content:

  • Battlecards (80+)
  • Competitive Analyses
  • Event/Conference/Trade Show Demonstration Scripts
  • Plans
  • Playbooks
  • Proposal Templates
  • Quality Improvement Documents
  • Requirements
  • Strategic Analyses

And here is the content that can be external or internal on any given day:

  • Email Newsletters (200+)
  • FAQs
  • Presentations

So if you need someone who can create this content for your identity/biometrics product, you know where to find me.

Four Reasons Why Differentiators Fade Away

I’ve talked ad nauseum about the need for a firm to differentiate itself from its competitors. If your firm engages in “me too” marketing, prospects have no reason to choose you.

But what about companies that DO differentiate themselves…and suddenly stop doing so?

There are four reasons why companies could stop differentiating themselves:

  1. The differentiator no longer exists.
  2. The differentiator is no longer important to prospects.
  3. The market has changed and the differentiator is no longer applicable.
  4. The differentiator still exists, but the company forgot about it.

Let’s look at these in turn.

The differentiator no longer exists

Sometimes companies gain a temporary competitive advantage that disappears as other firms catch up. But more often, the company only pursues the differentiator temporarily.

 In 1985, amid anxiety about trade deficits and the loss of American manufacturing jobs, Walton launched a “Made in America” campaign that committed Wal-Mart to buying American-made products if suppliers could get within 5 percent of the price of a foreign competitor. This may have compromised the bottom line in the short term, but Walton understood the long-term benefit of convincing employees and customers that the company had a conscience as well as a calculator. 

From https://reclaimdemocracy.org/brief-history-of-walmart/.

Now some of you may not remember Walmart’s “Made in America” banners, but I can assure you they were prevalent in many Walmarts in the 1980s and 1990s. Sam Walton’s autobiography even featured the phrase.

But as time passed, Walmart stocked fewer and fewer “Made in America” items as customers valued low prices over everything else. And some of the “Made in America” banners in Walmarts in the 1990s shouldn’t have been there:

“Dateline NBC” produced an exposé on the company’s sourcing practices. Although Wal-Mart’s “Made in America” campaign was still nominally in effect, “Dateline” showed that store-level associates had posted “Made in America” signs over merchandise actually produced in far away sweatshops. This sort of exposure was new to a company that had been a press darling for many years, and Wal-Mart’s stock immediately declined by 3 percent. 

From https://reclaimdemocracy.org/brief-history-of-walmart/.

The decline was only temporary as Walmart stock bounced back. And 20 years later, the cycle would repeat as Walmart launched a similar “Made in USA” campaign in 2013, only to run into Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforcement actions two years later.

The differentiator is no longer important

The Walmart domestic production episodes illustrate something else. If Walmart wanted to, it could have persevered and bought from domestic suppliers, even if the supplier price differential was greater than 5%.

But the buying customers didn’t really care.

Affordability was much more important to buyers than U.S. job creation.

So while labor leaders, politicians, and others may have complained about Walmart’s increasing reliance on Chinese goods, the company’s customers continued to do business with Walmart, bringing profitability to the company.

And before you decry the actions of consumers who act against their national self-interest…where was YOUR phone manufactured? China? Vietnam? Unless you own a Librem 5 USA, your phone isn’t from around here. We’re all Commies.

The market has changed

Sometimes the market changes and consumers look at things a little differently.

I’ve previously told the story of Mita, and its 1980s slogan “all we make are great copiers.” In essence, Mita had to adopt this slogan because, unlike its competitors, it did NOT have a diversified portfolio.

This worked for a while…until the “document solutions” industry (copiers and everything else) embraced digital technologies. Well, Fuji-Xerox, Ricoh and Konica did. Mita didn’t, and went bankrupt.

The former Mita is now part of Kyocera Document Solutions.

And stand-alone copiers aren’t even offered.

The company forgot

Before Walmart emphasized “Made in America” products, former (and present) stand-up comedian Steve Martin was dispensing tax advice.

“Steve.. how can I be a millionaire.. and never pay taxes?” First.. get a million dollars. Now.. you say, “Steve.. what do I say to the tax man when he comes to my door and says, ‘You.. have never paid taxes’?” Two simple words. Two simple words in the English language: “I forgot!”

From https://tonynovak.com/how-to-be-a-millionaire-and-not-pay-any-taxes/.

While the IRS will not accept this defense, there are times when people, and companies, forget things.

  • I know of one company that had a clear differentiator over most of its competition: the fact that a key component of its solution was self-authored, rather than being sourced from a third party.
  • For a time, the company strongly emphasized this differentiator, casting fear, uncertainty, and doubt against its competitors who depended upon third parties for this key component.
  • But time passes, priorities change, and the company’s website now buries this differentiator on a back page…making the company sound like all its competitors.

But the company has an impressive array of features, so there’s that.

Restore your differentiators

If your differentiators have faded away, or your former differentiators are no longer important, perhaps it’s time to re-emphasize them so that your prospects have a reason to choose you.

Ask yourself questions about why your firm is great, why all the other firms suck, and what benefits (not features) your customers enjoy that the competition’s customers don’t. Only THEN can you create content (or have your content creator do it for you).

A little postscript: originally I was only going to list three items in this post, but Hana LaRock counsels against this because bots default to three-item lists (see her item 4).

Three Technology News Sources

Are you hungry for (non-identity/biometric) technology news? Well, here are three places where you can find it.

Of course, nothing appears in any of these sources (or the more famous technology news sources) unless the companies create actual technology content.

Does your technology firm need help creating such content? Bredemarket can help.

Telling Stories

One of the most unusual attractions at Disneyland is the Storybook Land Canal Boats.

By Boris Dzhingarov – Disneyland park – Anaheim Los Angeles California USAUploaded by dzhingarov, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=28496999

Unlike some other attractions that bombard you with sight, sound, and speed, Storybook Land asks you to board a slow-moving boat while your host or hostess…tells stories.

The entire Disney empire, including its corporate acquisitions, is built on telling stories, from the mouse that piloted a steamboat to the basketball team that won an improbable sixth championship.

Board the Bredemarket canal boat

And many businesses depend on storytelling. My consultancy Bredemarket has helped many of them tell their stories.

Over the last month, Bredemarket has told the following stories for its clients:

  • Once upon a time, a faraway country passed legislation to protect its citizens from evil robbers. Here’s how [COMPANY]’s solution can help the country and its citizens stay safe from the big bad wolves. (Online content)
  • Once upon a time, a couple’s son disappeared and went on a long journey. Here’s how [COMPANY]’s solution helped reunite the family. (Online content)
  • Once upon a time, a firm paid a lot of money for some beans that appeared to be worthless. Here’s how [COMPANY]’s solution helped the beans to grow. (Online content)
  • Once upon a time, [COMPANY]’s solution was offered to some people, but [COMPANY] wanted to offer it to many more people. Here are some other people who could benefit from the solution. (Private market/competitor analysis)

It’s too early to tell if everyone lived happily ever after, but hopefully they will.

Can Bredemarket help your identity, technology, or local Inland Empire firm tell YOUR story?

Fischer Identity, Baylor University, and IAM

Fischer Identity recently shared a link to a Chronicle of Higher Education article about campus digital identities. It specifically discusses how Baylor University worked with Fischer Identity and Amazon Web Services (AWS) to create an identity and access management (IAM) solution.

I won’t give away all the information about the Fischer Identity-AWS effort at Baylor—you have to opt in to access a gated case study to obtain that—but I will say that the case study claims a 12-week implementation of an IAM system that stores “several hundred thousand identities.”

I assume the alumni at Baylor are a generous segment of the university community.

A Few Thoughts on FedRAMP

The 438 U.S. federal agencies (as of today) probably have over 439 different security requirements. When you add state and local agencies to the list, security compliance becomes a mind-numbing exercise.

  • For example, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation has its Criminal Justice Information Systems Security Policy (version 5.9 is here). This not only applies to the FBI, but to any government agency or private organization that interfaces to the relevant FBI systems.
  • Similarly, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has its Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule. Again, this also applies to private organizations.

But I don’t care about those. (Actually I do, but for the next few minutes I don’t.) Instead, let’s talk FedRAMP.

Why do we have FedRAMP?

The two standards that I mentioned above apply to particular government agencies. Sometimes, however, the federal government attempts to create a standard that applies to ALL federal agencies (and other relevant bodies). You can say that Login.gov is an example of this, although a certain company (I won’t name the company, but it likes to ID me) repeatedly emphasizes that Login.gov is not IAL2 compliant.

But forget about that. Let’s concentrate on FedRAMP.

Why do we have FedRAMP?

The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP®) was established in 2011 to provide a cost-effective, risk-based approach for the adoption and use of cloud services by the federal government. FedRAMP empowers agencies to use modern cloud technologies, with an emphasis on security and protection of federal information. In December 2022, the FedRAMP Authorization Act was signed as part of the FY23 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The Act codifies the FedRAMP program as the authoritative standardized approach to security assessment and authorization for cloud computing products and services that process unclassified federal information.

From https://www.fedramp.gov/program-basics/.

Note the critical word “unclassified.” So FedRAMP doesn’t cover EVERYTHING. But it does cover enough to allow federal agencies to move away from huge on-premise server rooms and enjoy the same SaaS advantages that private entities enjoy.

Today, government agencies can now consult a FedRAMP Marketplace that lists FedRAMP offerings the agencies can use for their cloud implementations.

A FedRAMP authorized product example

When I helped MorphoTrak propose its first cloud-based automated biometric identification solutions, our first customers were state and local agencies. To propose those first solutions, MorphoTrak partnered with Microsoft and used its Azure Government cloud. While those first implementations were not federal and did not require FedRAMP authorization, MorphoTrak’s successor IDEMIA clearly has an interest in providing federal non-classified cloud solutions.

When IDEMIA proposes federal solutions that require cloud storage, it can choose to use Microsoft Azure Government, which is now FedRAMP authorized.

It turns out that a number of other FedRAMP-authorized products are partially dependent upon Microsoft Azure Government’s FedRAMP authorization, so continued maintenance of this authorization is essential to Microsoft, a number of other vendors, and all the agencies that require secure cloud solutions.

They can only hope that the GSA Inspector General doesn’t find fault with THEM.

Is FedRAMP compliance worth it?

But assuming that doesn’t happen, is it worthwhile for vendors to pursue FedRAMP compliance?

If you are a company with a cloud service, there are likely quite a few questions you are asking yourself about your pursuits in the Federal market. When will the upward trajectory of cloud adoption begin? What agency will be the next to migrate to the cloud? What technologies will be migrated? As you move forward with your business development strategy you will also question whether FedRAMP compliance is something you should pursue?

The answer to the last question is simple: Yes. If you want the Federal Government to purchase your cloud service offering you will, sooner or later, have to successfully navigate the FedRAMP process.

From https://www.mindpointgroup.com/blog/fedramp-compliance-is-it-worth-it.

And a lot of companies are doing just that. But with less than 400 FedRAMP authorized services, there’s obviously room for growth.

Worldcoin Publicly Exposes Its Security

One advantage of an open source project is that there are far fewer secrets to hide. If a commercial firm develops biometric products, it has a responsibility to its investors to not release sensitive information.

Worldcoin has few limitations on sharing information because it is an open source project, so when governments in Argentina, Kenya, and elsewhere raised questions about what Worldcoin does with its citizens’ biometric data, Worldcoin could afford to conduct a security assessment…and publicly share the results.

Although findings…describe potential attack surfaces and are of high or medium severity, (Trail of Bits’) analysis did not uncover vulnerabilities in the Orb’s code…

From https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/2023-08-worldcoin-orb-securityreview.pdf

Read Trail of Bits’ full report at https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/2023-08-worldcoin-orb-securityreview.pdf. Note that Trail of Bits ONLY analyzed the software running on the Orb, NOT the back-end software.

Also see Biometric Update’s coverage. It notes that Trail of Bits also analyzed the security of Voatz’s voting software.

What is B2B Writing?

Business-to-business (B2B) writing isn’t as complex as some people say it is. It may be hard, but it’s not complex.

Why do I care about what B2B writing is?

Neil Patel (or, more accurately, his Ubersuggest service) um, suggested that I say something about B2B writing.

And then he (or it) suggested that I use generative artificial intelligence (AI) to write the piece.

I had a feeling the result was going to suck, but I clicked the “Write For Me” button anyway.

Um, thanks but no thanks. When the first sentence doesn’t even bother to define the acronym “B2B,” you know the content isn’t useful to explain the topic “what is B2B writing.”

And this, my friends, is why I never let generative AI write the first draft of a piece.

So, what IS B2B writing?

Before I explain what B2B writing is, maybe I’d better explain what “B2B” is. And two related acronyms.

  • B2B stands for business to business. Bredemarket, for example, is a business that sells to other businesses. In my case, marketing and writing services.
  • B2G stands for business to government. Kinda sorta like B2B, but government folks are a little different. For example, these folks mourned the death of Mike Causey. (I lived outside of Washington DC early in Causey’s career. He was a big deal.) A B2G company, for example, could sell driver’s license products and services to state motor vehicle agencies.
  • B2C stands for business to consumer. Many businesses create products and services that are intended for consumers and marketed directly to them, not to intermediate businesses. Promotion of a fast food sandwich is an example of a B2C marketing effort.

I included the “B2G” acronym because most of my years in identity and biometrics were devoted to local, state, federal, and international government sales. My B2G experience is much deeper than my B2B experience, and way deeper than my B2C expertise.

Let’s NOT make this complicated

I’m sure that Ubersuggest could spin out a whole bunch of long-winded paragraphs that explain the critical differences between the three marketing efforts above. But let’s keep it simple and limit ourselves to two truths and no lies.

TRUTH ONE: When you market B2B or B2G products or services, you have FEWER customers than when you market B2C products or services.

That’s pretty much it in terms of differences. I’ll give you an example.

  • If Bredemarket promoted its marketing and writing services to all of the identity verification companies, I would target less than 200 customers.
  • If IDEMIA or Thales or GET Group or CBN promoted their driver’s license products and services to all of the state, provincial, and territorial motor vehicle agencies in the United States and Canada, they would target less than 100 customers.
  • If McDonald’s resurrects and promotes its McRib sandwich, it would target hundreds of millions of customers in the United States alone.

The sheer scale of B2C marketing vs. B2B/B2G marketing is tremendous and affects how the company markets its products and services.

But one thing is similar among all three types of writing.

TRUTH TWO: B2B writing, B2G writing, and B2C writing are all addressed to PEOPLE.

Well, until we program the bots to read stuff for us.

This is something we often forget. We think that we are addressing a blog post or a proposal to an impersonal “company.” Um, who works in companies? People.

(Again, until we program the bots.)

Whether you’re marketing a business blog post writing service, a government software system, or a pseudo rib sandwich, you’re pitching it to a person. A person with problems and needs that you can potentially solve.

So solve their needs.

Don’t make it complex.

But what IS B2B writing?

Let’s return to the original question. Sorry, I got off on a bit of a tangent. (But at least I didn’t trail off into musings about “the dynamic and competitive world.”)

When I write something for a business:

  • I must focus on that business and not myself (customer focus). The business doesn’t want to hear my talk about myself. The business wants to hear what I can do for it.
  • I must acknowledge the business’ needs and explain the benefits of my solution to meet the business needs. A feature list without any benefits is just a list of cool things; you still have to explain how the cool things will benefit the business by solving its problem.
  • My writing must address one, or more, different types of people who are hungry for my solution to their problem. (This is what Ubersuggest and others call a “target audience,” because I guess Ubersuggest aims lasers at the assembled anonymous crowd.)

Again, this is hard, but not complex.

It’s possible to make this MUCH MORE complex and create a 96 step plan to author B2B content.

But why?

So now I’ve answered the question “What is B2B writing?”

Can Bredemarket write for your business? If so, contact me.