Let’s look at another joke that I inserted into my “On The Fly” video, this one specific to gait uniqueness.
We first captured fingers and faces in a stationary way and then captured then on the move. But we always capture gait on the move. So to fit into the pattern of my video, I captured gait on the move—just faster.

But you don’t have to be a doctor to recognize the fallacy of my assumption. While gait is a behavioral biometric, it is influenced by a person’s muscular structure. The muscles you use when you walk differ from the muscles you use when you run. Or, as my buddy Google Gemini worded it, “Dynamic features—such as continuous joint angles (hip, knee, ankle) and vertical center-of-mass oscillations—do not scale linearly with velocity.”
And of course we return to the problem with nearly all biometrics: are gaits unique to every individual? It makes sense that they are, since everyone has an individualized bone structure, coupled with a specific body history (broken legs and the like). But that doesn’t prove gait uniqueness…or for that matter fingerprint uniqueness. (Probably out of scope for Judge Carmen Messano’s efforts, but we still need to bear this in mind.)
Now there are studies of gait recognition, but none encompass billions of people. Gait Recognition in the Wild (GREW) includes 26,000 identities and 128,000 sequences. But even if we DID have multiple billions of gait samples, it only requires a single case of two people having the exact same gait to disprove the theory of gait uniqueness.
And fingers and faces don’t change with velocity.
Now I’ll admit that gait isn’t one of my biometric specialties like finger, face, iris, voice, and DNA. But I’m familiar enough with the modality that I can help you create relevant content, proposal, and analysis material.
Visit https://bredemarket.com/watch-book/ to learn how Bredemarket can help your biometric firm.








