Arrived at FoundrSpace for the RC Tech Forum. “Technology in the Digital Marketing Landscape” by Drew Mabry.



Identity/biometrics/technology marketing and writing services
Arrived at FoundrSpace for the RC Tech Forum. “Technology in the Digital Marketing Landscape” by Drew Mabry.



“I ask, then I act” is an attention-grabbing statement, but it’s admittedly simplistic. I don’t fall in the “ready, fire, aim” school, but believe that action incorporates review. As the management consultants Daft Punk stated many years ago:
One more time
And they proceeded to say:
One more time
So I guess it’s important.
One time I used my technology product marketing expertise to draft a piece for a client, which the client then edited with Track Changes on. The client made a number of improvements to my text, so I should have been happy with that and let it go. But I thought I’d look at the document.
One more time.
So I made a copy of the document, accepted all the changes in the copy, and had Microsoft Word read the document to me (Review menu, Speech section, Read Aloud).

Unlike the audio transcription tool (now superseded by AI meeting assistants), the built-in “Read Aloud” feature remains essential today.
Everything flowed well, and Word’s built-in editor didn’t flag anything.
But my eye caught something.
In my initial draft, I had referenced the client’s 800 number.
Which in and of itself isn’t bad.
Except for the fact that this is a worldwide company, and many of the prospects who responded to the piece would be calling from outside the United States, where 800 numbers are not supported.

So I shot an urgent message saying to correct my error and change the number from an 800 number to a domestic number.
That one additional review eliminated a possible source of friction between my client and its prospects.
Problem solved, even before anyone noticed there was a problem.
Anyone notice the similarity between this song and Phil Collins’ “One More Night”? Or is it just me?
Yes, I perform vanity searches.
I just searched for mentions of Bredemarket that are NOT on the Bredemarket website, and ended up on Bredemarket’s Crunchbase page.
Where I was surprised to learn the following:
“This year, Bredemarket is projected to spend $187.5K on IT, according to Aberdeen.”
Let’s just say that estimate is slightly off.
Follow along.
If I am the technology product marketing expert…
…and if I am the biometric product marketing expert…
…and if content marketing and product marketing significantly overlap…
…then I am not only the biometric content marketing expert…
…but am also the technology content marketing expert.
I’m claiming it all.
(Part of the biometric product marketing expert series)
There are certain assumptions that you make in biometrics.
Namely, that certain biometrics are unable to differentiate twins: facial recognition, and DNA analysis.
Now as facial recognition algorithms get bettter and better, perhaps they will be able to tell twins apart: even identical twins.
But DNA is DNA, right?
Mike Bowers (CSIDDS) links to an article in Forensic Magazine which suggests that twins’ DNA can be differentiated.
For the first time in the U.S., an identical twin has been convicted of a crime based on DNA analysis.
The breakthrough came from Parabon Nanolabs, who’s scientists used deep whole genome sequencing to identify extremely rare “somatic mutations” that differentiated Russell Marubbio and his twin, John. The results were admitted as evidence in court, making last week’s conviction of Russell in the 1987 rape of a 50-year-old woman a landmark case.
Parabon Nanolabs (whom I briefly mentioned in 2024) applied somatic mutations as follows:
Somatic mutations are DNA changes that happen after conception and can cause genetic differences between otherwise identical twins. These mutations can arise during the earliest stages of embryonic development, affecting the split of the zygote, and accumulate throughout life due to errors in cell division. Somatic mutations can be present in only one twin, a subset of cells, or both, potentially leading to differences in health and even developmental disorders—and in this case, DNA.
The science behind somatic mutations is not new, and is well-researched, understood and accepted. It’s just uncommon for DNA to lead to twins, and even more uncommon for somatic mutations to be able to distinguish between twins.
Note that “well-researched, understood and accepted” part (even though it lacks an Oxford comma). Because this isn’t the only recent story that touches upon whole genome sequencing.
Bowers also links to a CNN article which references Daubert/Frye-like questions about whether evidence is admissable.
Evidence derived from cutting-edge DNA technology that prosecutors say points directly at Rex Heuermann being the Gilgo Beach serial killer will be admissible at his trial, a Suffolk County judge ruled Wednesday….
Heuermann’s defense attorney Michael Brown had argued the DNA technology, known as whole genome sequencing, has not yet been widely accepted by the scientific community and therefore shouldn’t be permitted. He said he plans to argue the validity of the technology before a jury.
Meanwhile, prosecutors have argued this type of DNA extraction has been used by local law enforcement, the FBI and even defense attorneys elsewhere in the country, according to court records.
Let me point out one important detail: the fact that police agencies are using a particular technology doesn’t mean that said technology is “widely accepted by the scientific community.” I suspect that this same question will be raised in other courts, and other judges may hold a different decision.
And after checking my blog, I realize that I have never written an article about Daubert/Frye. Another assignment for Bredebot, I guess…
Your identity/biometric product marketing needs to assert the facts rather than old lies,
(CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=245337.)
The names and identification numbers have been changed to protect my PII.
Early this morning, I received an email from my bank, Wildebeest Bank.
Your Wildebeest Bank debit card transaction was declined.
A transaction on your debit card ending in 1234 was declined.
So I went to my Wildebeest Bank app to see what company tried to charge to my card, and how much they tried to charge. But I found nothing.
Then I realized that my debit card does NOT end in 1234, but in 5678. I’ve had that debit card since…well, since May 2024, when “enron*publications us” fraudulently charged $8.28 to my card that DID end in 1234.
Wildebeest Bank cancelled that card immediately and issued a new one.
And no one tried to use that old card until today.
And Wildebeest Bank just laughed at the attempt, not even bothering to inform me of the details.
I’ve been interested in brand archetypes for years. You’ll recall my first post on the topic, after which I used Kaye Putnam’s quiz to determine my archetypes: primarily Sage, with some others.

This morning I attended a webinar, sponsored by Verizon and under the auspices of SCORE and BizHuub, on the topic of budget-friendly branding. It was presented by Warrick and Takicha Roundtree.
After some preliminary discussions, the Roundtrees focused on the topic of the 12 brand archetypes. They then encouraged us to explore our brand archetypes, with the help of our favorite generative AI tool.
I am Bredemarket. I offer marketing and writing services (content, proposal, analysis) to identity, biometrics, and technology firms. I sell these services to marketing leaders at these firms. Give me a list of psychographic characteristics of my most likely buyer.
Here is a list of psychographic characteristics of your most likely buyer, the marketing leader at an identity, biometrics, or technology firm. These characteristics go beyond simple demographics and aim to uncover their motivations, challenges, and attitudes.
Which of the 12 brand archetypes would appeal to my customers?
Based on the psychographic characteristics of your target customer—the marketing leader at a technology, biometrics, or identity firm—several brand archetypes would likely resonate most strongly.
The key is to choose an archetype that speaks to their professional motivations, pain points, and desire for a strategic, trustworthy partner.
Here are the most relevant archetypes for Bredemarket:
For Bredemarket, the Sage and Creator are your strongest primary archetypes.
You can then use the Hero archetype to frame your marketing messages around the problems you solve, and the Ruler to reassure potential clients about your professionalism and reliability.
By combining these, you can craft a brand identity that is both intelligent and innovative, while also being trustworthy and empowering for your target customer.
So what have I learned from the Roundtrees’ prompts and Google Gemini’s responses?
Well, at least my Sage and Royalty/Ruler archetypes are on, um, target with my audience.
I need to analyze the rest of the two responses and perhaps make some changes in direction in my self-promotional content. After all, Google never lies.
In truth, why is Google happy that I’m ignoring its marketing advice?
Is the medical facility working with the right patient?
Hackensack Meridian Health in New Jersey claims that it knows who its patients are. It has partnered with CLEAR for patient identification, according to AInvest. Among the listed benefits of the partnership are enhanced security:
“CLEAR1 meets NIST’s Identity Assurance Level 2 (IAL2) standards, a rare feat in the healthcare sector, ensuring robust protection against fraud.”
But is IAL2 that rare in healthcare?
Other vendors, such as Proof, ID.me, and Nametag certainly talk about it.
And frankly (if you ignore telehealth) the healthcare field is ripe for IAL3 implementation.
If you are a healthcare solution marketer, you’re NOT with CLEAR, and you’re angry that AInvest claims that IAL2 is “a rare feat” in healthcare…

…then you need to get the word out about your solution.
And Bredemarket can help. Schedule a free meeting with me.
Hungry people
Literally.
Not a target audience, unless you’re a B2C product marketer.
Inspired by the “apocalypse loop” by Mythical Convergence, posted in a private Facebook group.
I just published a new edition of Bredemarket’s LinkedIn newsletter this afternoon. Here’s how I started it:
“For years I maintained a negative stance on generative AI-authored text. But I recently tried relaxing it. By doing this I learned what AI authors are capable of…and what they clearly CANNOT do.”
Much of the article rehashes material I’ve shared before, but I did provide a little detail on the temperamental writer’s emotional hurt when Zoominfo turned to the bots:
“My first reaction was akin to a river in Egypt. I remain a temperamental writer, you know.”

But at least I closed the thing with a call to action.
“But if you are a marketing leader at an identity, biometric, or technology company, and you want an experienced human to help you with your content, proposals, and analysis, why don’t you schedule a free meeting with me to talk about your needs. Visit https://bredemarket.com/mark/ to find out more.”
