Feed is a verb.
Let’s talk: https://bredemarket.com/mark/

Identity/biometrics/technology marketing and writing services
Feed is a verb.
Let’s talk: https://bredemarket.com/mark/

(This is the old version of this post. See the new version from July 8 with improved algorithmic landing page-ability.)
For identity/biometric marketing leaders only!
Make an impact with the biometric product marketing expert.
Bredemarket’s biometric product marketing expertise: https://bredemarket.com/bpme/
Discuss your content-proposal-analysis needs with me before your competitors steal your prospects: https://bredemarket.com/cpa/
(Imagen 4)
Biometric marketing leaders already know that I’ve talked about reader personas to death. But what about WRITER personas? And what happens when you try to address ALL the reader and writer personas?
While there are drawbacks to using personas, they are useful in both content marketing and proposal work when you want to tailor your words to resonate with particular types of readers (target audiences, or hungry people).
I still love my example from 2021 in which a mythical Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued by my hometown of Ontario, California for an Automated Biometric Identification System (ABIS). The proposal manager had to bear the following target audiences (hungry people) in mind for different parts of the proposal.
But who is actually writing the text to address these different types of readers?
Now in this case I’m not talking about archetypes (a topic in itself), but about the roles of the subject matter experts who write or help write the content.
I am currently working on some internal content for a Bredemarket biometric client. I can’t reveal what type of content, but it’s a variant of one of the 22 types of content I’ve previously addressed. A 23rd type, I guess.
Anyway, I am writing this content from a product marketing perspective, since I am the self-proclaimed biometric product marketing expert. This means that the internal content fits into a story, focuses on the customer, highlights benefits, and dwells on the product.
But what would happen if someone in a role other than product marketing consultant wrote this content?
So the final content is not only shaped by the reader, but by the writer.
With all the different reader and writer personas, how should you respond?
Do all the things?
Perhaps you can address everyone in a 500 page proposal, but the internal content Bredemarket is creating is less than 10 pages long.
Which is possibly already too long for MY internal target audience.
So I will NOT create the internal content that addresses the needs of EVERY reader and writer persona.
Which is one truth about (reader) personas in general. If you need to address three personas, it’s more effective to create 3 separate pieces than a single one.
Which is what I’m doing in another project for this same Bredemarket biometric client, this one customer-facing.
And the content targeted to latent examiners won’t mention the needs of Paul Leon.
So now I, the biometric product marketing expert writer persona, will re-address you, the biometric marketing leader reader persona.
You need content, or proposal content.
But maybe you’re not getting it because your existing staff is overwhelmed.
So you’re delaying content creation or proposal responses, or just plain not doing it. And letting opportunities slip through your fingers.
Plug the leaks and stop your competitors from stealing from you. Bring Bredemarket on board. Schedule a free exploratory meeting today at https://bredemarket.com/cpa/.
Need an impact?

Made an impact.
Contact me below.
(All pictures Imagen 4)
You are the CMO, marketing leader, or other leader at an identity, biometric, or technology firm.
You’ve made the decision to work with Bredemarket to create your content, proposal, or analysis.
You’ve gone to the https://bredemarket.com/cpa/ page and scheduled a “Free 30 minute content needs assessment” with me on my Calendly calendar. We will talk via Google Meet.
You’ve answered the preliminary questions I asked in the meeting request, including:
So…what now?
I will make it real simple. I will ask you a single simple question:
“Why?”
We have 30 minutes to chat, and at the end of that time you and I will jointly determine
See you soon.
Today I’m doing something different.
So if you are with an organization that SELLS identity proofing solutions, you can stop reading now. You don’t want to know what I am about to tell your prospects…or do you?
But if you BUY identity proofing, read on for some helpful expert advice from the biometric product marketing expert.
When you buy an identity proofing solution, you take on many responsibilities. While your vendor may be able to help, the ultimate responsibility remains with you.
Here are some questions you must answer:
Again…are you ready?
So how do other organizations manage identity proofing solutions? According to Biometric Update, not well.
A new Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit found the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has not exercised sufficient oversight of its digital identity-proofing program…
As many of you know, the IRS’ identity proofing vendor is ID.me. The GAO didn’t find any fault with ID.me. And frankly, it couldn’t…because according to the GAO, the IRS’ management of ID.me was found to be deficient.
“IRS was unable to show it had measurable goals and objectives for the program. IRS receives performance data from the vendor but did not show it independently identified outcomes it is seeking. IRS also has not shown documented procedures to routinely evaluate credential service providers’ performance. Without stronger performance reviews, IRS is hindered in its ability to take corrective actions as needed.
“ID.me acknowledges that its identity-proofing process involves the use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. However, IRS has not documented these uses in its AI inventory or taken steps to comply with its own AI oversight policies. Doing so would provide greater assurance that taxpayers’ rights are protected and that the technologies are accurate, reliable, effective, and transparent.”
So while ID.me meets the IRS’ key requirement of Identity Assurance Level 2 (IAL 2) compliance, is it performing well? The IRS needs to define what “performing well” means.
You would think the IRS had a process for this…but apparently it doesn’t.
Dead on arrival (DOA).
I’ll grant that you’re not the IRS. But is your identity proofing program management better…or worse?
Do you know what questions to ask?
Let Bredemarket ask you some questions. Perhaps these can help you create relevant external and internal content (I’ve created over 22 types of content), manage an RFP proposal process, or analyze your industry, company, or competitors.
Let’s set up a free 30-minute consultation to assess your needs.
So Bredemarket’s talking about “ubiquity via focus”?
Focus on where?
On the Bredemarket blog, your source for the latest identity/biometric and technology news.
And your source for the most up-to-date information on Bredemarket’s content-proposal-analysis services.
Be sure to visit https://bredemarket.com/blog/
Or better yet, subscribe at https://bredemarket.com/subscribe-to-bredemarket/