Let Your Competitors Market Your Product

They’ll be happy to talk about you.

As I noted in February.

One: You save money. Why spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on go-to-market or sales enablement materials? Let your competitors incur those costs.

Two: You save time. The best product marketing initiatives occur in a joint process between the marketing leader and the product marketing consultant. But this requires commitment on your part: in initial project definition, draft review, and final publication.

Three: You save trouble. If your product marketing content has an effective call to action, there is the danger that a prospect may act on it, creating more work for your sales organization.

You can save money, time, and trouble by your silence. Let your competitors bear the burden of defining your product to your prospects. They will be more than happy to do so.

Surviving Without Electricity or Internet, Part Two

(Yes, the picture is technically inaccurate, as you shall see.)

Last month I wrote about surviving without electricity or internet, in the midst of my eight days with very unreliable internet.

Which brought me to roughly 3:40 this afternoon.

At 3:40 the phone in my bedroom made a funny noise and displayed a message that the power was out at the main handset.

Oh, and my clock wasn’t displaying the time.

So, how about that router light?

  • When wi-fi is available, the router light is blue.
  • When it isn’t, the light is red.
  • This afternoon, there was no light at all.

I’m a Southern California Edison customer, but I had problems getting to its website on cellular. The power outage affected a good swath of northwest Ontario, so I guess everyone was trying to use cellular internet.

My Facebook app could (somewhat) connect, and people on the O.N.Z group were reporting estimated fix times between 5:30 pm and 9:30 pm.

Then I received a text: not from SCE, but from my Internet Service Provider.

“There is a service outage affecting your area. Restoration estimated by 9:30 PM.”

How would they know? It wasn’t the ISP’s problem.

A second text followed.

“The service interruption affecting…services in and around your area is being caused by a power outage. Restoration estimated by 4:40 PM.”

By this time I had left home to go to a place outside the affected area…with air conditioning. But I continued to monitor O.N.Z. (a private Facebook group, so no links or quotes). And someone reported that power was back.

So I checked my ISP and thermostat apps and confirmed this.

A technical problem can have so many causes…including a loss of electricity that affects all things power-dependent.

Whether You Call It ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2025 or NIST SP 500-290e4…It’s Out

Regardless of the concerns of Europeans and others about U.S. de facto governance of biometric standards, countries around the world still base their data interchange formats on a document written by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and approved by the American National Standards Institute.

This document has been revised many times over the years. I first worked with the 1993 version of the document, which concentrated on binary and grayscale fingerprints with resolutions as high as 500 pixels per inch, but sometimes lower.

The new 2025 version (PDF), released in March 2026, covers a lot more. And sometimes a lot less.

  • 1 Transaction information
  • 2 User-defined descriptive text
  • 3 Deprecated
  • 4 Legacy
  • 5 Deprecated
  • 6 Deprecated
  • 7 User-defined image
  • 8 Signature image
  • 9 Friction ridge metadata
  • 10 Photographic body part imagery (including face and SMT)
  • 11 Voice data
  • 12 Forensic dental and oral data
  • 13 Variable-resolution latent friction ridge image
  • 14 Variable-resolution fingerprint image
  • 15 Variable-resolution palm print image
  • 16 User-defined variable-resolution testing image
  • 17 Iris image
  • 18 DNA data
  • 19 Variable-resolution plantar image
  • 20 Source representation
  • 21 Associated context
  • 22 Non-photographic imagery
  • 23-97 Reserved for future use
  • 98 Information assurance
  • 99 CBEFF biometric data record

Note the “deprecated” and “legacy” data types. In 1993, Type 4 was the gold standard for fingerprint images; now it’s just “legacy.” And forget about binary representations or anything less than 500 ppi.

Time marches on.

But some people have been around for much of the ride. I scanned the lists of working group members and found Kenneth Blue, Tom Buss, Roland Fournier, Patrick Grother, Mike McCabe, John Splain, Mark Walch, and many others who remember Type 4 and 250 ppi binary images.

And the canvassees included government and industry representatives from within and outside of the United States, including Canada, Germany, Japan, Latvia, Slovakia, Switzerland, other countries I probably mnissed, and INTERPOL.

If Europe or other countries do break away from NIST standards, it will be a rupturing break.

Multiple Identifiers: I Didn’t Know What NIST SP 500-290 Was

People memorize arcane text strings when they use them a lot. But until now I never memorized NIST SP 500-290…even though it refers to a document I reference fairly constantly.

Because NIST SP 500-290 is another identifier for the documents in the ANSI/NIST-ITL 1 data exchange series…a series that goes back to 1986 before NIST technically existed.

National Bureau of Standards. We don’t need no stinking technology.
  • The first version to be tagged as a NIST Special Publication (SP) was ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011, also known as SP 500-290.
  • This was followed by ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 Update: 2013, a/k/a SP 500-290e2 (Edition 2).
  • Next was ANSI/NIST-ITL 1-2011 Update: 2015, or SP 500-290e3.

What about Edition 4?

Come back to the Bredemarket blog in an hour.

The April 2, 2026 List of PAD 3 Conforming Solutions

Update to the March 25 version. Added BioID.

VendorModalityConfirming LabLink/Date
AwareFaceBixeLabNovember 2025
BioIDFaceTüvitAugust 2025 (1) (2)
FaceTecFaceBixeLabOctober 2025
IncodeFaceiBetaFebruary 2026
Oz ForensicsFaceBixeLabMarch 2026
ParavisionFaceIngeniumSeptember 2025
YotiFaceiBetaJanuary 2026

I’m slowly finding these vendors. I won’t maintain this list forever, but as long as there are so few Level 3 solutions, I want to highlight them.

Coincidentally, I just reviewed an eBook by one of the vendors listed above, detailing things that you should seek in your liveness detection vendor.

  • The eBook listed several items.
  • To no one’s surprise, this particular vendor provided ALL of these items in its liveness detection solution.
  • Surprisingly, however, the vendor did NOT mention independent confirmation of PAD capabilities.

Why Did Apple Implement iPhone/iPad Age Verification in the United Kingdom?

There has been ongoing debate on whether age verification should be implemented at the website level or at the operating system level…or not at all.

In the United Kingdom, Apple is opting for OS level age verification, according to the BBC.

“Apple is rolling out age checks for iPhone and iPad users in the UK that will ask them to verify if they are adults to access “certain services” such as 18-plus apps.

“After customers accept the latest iOS 26.4 software update, they will be asked to verify their age, which they can do by providing a credit card or scanning their ID, according to an Apple support page.

“Those who do not confirm how old they are or are underage will have web content filters turned on automatically.”

Specifically, according to Apple:

“When creating a new Apple Account or using Apple services, you may see a prompt asking you to confirm that you’re an adult. This is required by law in some countries and regions.”

Regarding that last sentence, is OS level age verification REQUIRED? Silkie Carlo of Big Brother Watch says no:

“Carlo told the BBC she believed Apple had “crossed the Rubicon” with its new software update which she described as “more like ransomware”, and which she said essentially left millions of Brits owning a “child’s device”, unless they complied with the age checks.

“And she said while she believed children’s online safety was vital, it required more thoughtful tech responsibility and not “sweeping, draconian shock demands by foreign companies for all of our IDs and credit cards”.”

Note the appeal to resist the “American” company, which raises questions about whether Apple’s collection of this information potentially violates United Kingdom privacy laws if the data is sent to Cupertino.

For the record, Ofcom currently only requires age verification for pornographic sites, not for everything.

So why did Apple do it if UK law doesn’t require it?

Two reasons:

  • Future proofing. While the UK and other jurisdictions do not require age verification at the OS level now, they may require it at some point. If so, Apple has already implemented it in the UK (for iPhones and iPads) and can implement it elsewhere.
  • CYA. A jury in California awarded damages after finding that Meta and Google were responsible for a woman’s anxiety and depression, suffered because of her social media use as a child. Apple doesn’t want to face a similar lawsuit.

Incidentally, it’s interesting to note that these and other stories pair “Meta” and “Google.” Does no one refer to “Alphabet” (Google’s parent company) any more?

The EU Common Charger, Laptops…and the Future

I have an old iPhone with a Lightning charger port. I can’t buy this today in the European Union. (Or anywhere, but we’ll get to that.) Why? Because of the EU’s Common Charger Directive.

“Because the EU has standardised charging ports for mobile phones and other portable electronic devices, all new devices sold in the EU must now support USB-C charging.”

Which devices?

“From 28 December 2024, the rules apply to mobile phones, tablets, digital cameras, headphones, headsets, videogame consoles, portable speakers, e-readers, keyboards, mice, portable navigation systemsand earbuds sold in the EU.”

So all of this went into effect in 2024?

Um, no.

Laptops

Because there is one additional requirement.

“From 28 April 2026, they will also apply to laptops.”

(Sorry, desktop computer users. You may still have old style power connections.)

Google Gemini.

For the record, Bredemarket’s U.S. purchased laptop already has a USB-C charging port. Because when the manufacturers were forced to implement this for Europe, it was easier to do it for the rest of the world.

So everyone is happy and enjoying the EU’s listed benefits of consumer convenience, e-waste reduction, and cost savings.

Yes, everyone is happy…for now.

The future

But what happens when wireless charging supports up to 240W? Then you get some REAL cost savings, because manufacturers—especially of small devices—can reduce cost by eliminating charging ports altogether.

Well, except in the EU, where charging mechanisms other than USB-C are illegal. Not just illegal to market: illegal to even sell in the first place.

It’s not that big a deal to throw a USB-C port on to a laptop, which has several ports already.

But a phone?

Even my older iPhone has reduced the number of ports down to one. (Separate headphone jacks disappeared years ago.)

Imagine if Apple, Samsung, and everyone else could sell smartphones with ZERO ports. Not only does this reduce cost, but it helps to preserve the integrity of the device.

And the phone manufacturers will take advantage of this in Asia, the Americas, and Africa.

Google Gemini.

While still maintaining the government-mandated (and more expensive) USB-C versions in Europe.

Because once a government mandates something, it’s nearly impossible to change.

What If Software Tools Identified Errors Instead of Making Them?

As you know, I’m tired of the simplistic “we use AI” marketing messaging. One reason is because when prospects hear “we use AI,” they may respond with “Oh, that technology that hallucinates.” This is NOT a good selling point.

But what if your tool, whether it is artificial intelligence or a thousand Third World workers, could actually IDENTIFY errors?

For example, this is the claim that PracticeTek’s ChiroTouch makes:

“Reviews chart notes and billing codes automatically

“Flags missing documentation and risky billing in real time

“Creates audit-ready, consistent records”

It’s nice to clean up messes before they become part of your permanent record (1:04).