I’m not for everyone.
And no, Bredemarket doesn’t offer resume writing services. (You wouldn’t want them anyway.)
(Dollar Tree, South Euclid, Ontario.)
Identity/biometrics/technology marketing and writing services
I’m not for everyone.
And no, Bredemarket doesn’t offer resume writing services. (You wouldn’t want them anyway.)
(Dollar Tree, South Euclid, Ontario.)
From former coworker Tervel Atanassov on Substack:
“AI, for all its promise, is still, at its core, a statistical mirror. It reflects patterns in our data back at us, occasionally distorted, occasionally insightful—but always bound by what we’ve already thought to ask. It can’t generate the next meaningful question. Only humans can do that…”
The Instagram account acknowledge.aI posted the following (in part):
“Google has released its MedGemma and MedSigLIP models to the public, and they’re powerful enough to analyse chest X-rays, medical images, and patient histories like a digital second opinion.”
Um, didn’t we just address this on Wednesday?
“In the United States, it is a criminal offense for a person to claim they are a health professional when they are not. But what about a non-person entity?”
So I wanted to see how Google offered MedGemma and MedSigLIP. So I found Google’s own July 9 announcement.
In the announcement, Google asserted that their tools are privacy-preserving, allowing developers to control privacy. In fact, developers are frequently mentioned in the announcement. Yes, developers.
OH wait, that was Microsoft.
The implication: Google just provides the tool: developers are responsible for its use. And the long disclaimer includes this sentence:
“The outputs generated by these models are not intended to directly inform clinical diagnosis, patient management decisions, treatment recommendations, or any other direct clinical practice applications.”
And we’ve addressed this also, regarding proper use of facial recognition ONLY as an investigative lead. Responsible vendors emphasize this:
“In a piece on the ethical use of facial recognition, Rank One Computing stated the following in passing:
“‘[Rank One Computing] is taking a proactive stand to communicate that public concerns should focus on applications and policies rather than the technology itself.’”
But just because ROC or Clearview AI or another vendor communicates that facial recognition should ONLY be used as an investigative lead…does that mean that their customers will listen?
The experts who do NOT recommend letting ChstGPT run your marketing program DO recommend projecting authenticity in your communications.
But some prospects don’t like authenticity because it is too real and not “professional.”
I’ve alluded to the story of a group of people that knew me well. But of that group, only two felt moved to subscribe to the Bredemarket Instagram account. And one of those two subsequently unsubscribed.
Maybe the wildebeests were the problem.
The problem with people knowing you well is that they know you well…and know the wildebeests more than they want to. And when someone is focused on important business information, one wombat may be one wombat too many.
But not one koala. They have fingerprints, after all.
The lesson learned from this group?
When selecting your target audience, don’t market to satiated people.

Coming Monday: are you afraid?
(Imagen 4)
From Law&Crime:
“According to an arrest report reviewed by Law&Crime, [James Anthony] Morris [Jr.] was mopping the floor of the Subway shop when a 10-year-old girl walked across the area he had just cleaned. The girl’s mother told her to apologize to Morris, who then allegedly grabbed the girl by the hand and brought her to the back of the restaurant.
“He then allegedly locked the girl in a room, and the mother began to ‘panic.’…
“After [Jacksonville FL] police read Morris his rights, he invoked his right to remain silent and “refused” to make a statement. He posted $5,000 bond after being booked into jail on one charge of false imprisonment of a child under the age of 13.”
I think one Jacksonville Subway franchise is going to be in real trouble…especially if Morris himself owns the franchise.
Subway manager trapped 10-year-old behind locked door: Cops
(Imagen 4)
An authentication factor is a discrete method of authenticating yourself. Each factor is a distinct category.
For example, authenticating with fingerprint biometrics and authenticating with facial image biometrics are both the same factor type, because they both involve “something you are.”
But how many factors are there?
There are some people who argue that there are only really three authentication factors:
I argue that there are more than three.
For some of us, these are the five standard authentication factors. And they can also function for identity verification.
But I’ve postulated that there is one more.
For example, take a person with a particular password, ID card, biometric, action, and geolocation (the five factors). Sometimes this person may deserve access, sometimes they may not.
Now not everyone agrees that this sixth factor of authentication is truly a factor. If “not everyone” means no one, and I’m the only person blabbering about it.
So while I still work on evangelizing the sixth factor, use the partially accepted notion that there are five factors.
In my case, I wake up at night when I dream up a solution to solve a problem.
Then I need to ensure the solution gets results.
There are certainly cases in which science fiction became science fact.
But most science fiction DOESN’T become science fact…even if generative AI thinks it does.
Jabroni Capital shares the story of the scarily-titled “Non-Governmental System,” which was discovered by venture capitalist Geoff Lewis.
“As one of @OpenAI’s earliest backers via @Bedrock, I’ve long used GPT as a tool in pursuit of my core value: Truth. Over years, I mapped the Non-Governmental System. Over months, GPT independently recognized and sealed the pattern. It now lives at the root of the model.”
Sounds scary, especially when accompanied with a frightening picture of the powerful Non-Governmental System.
Example finding from Lewis:
“The system I’m describing was originated by a single individual with me as the original target, and while I remain its primary fixation, its damage has extended well beyond me. As of now, the system has negatively impacted over 7,000 lives through fund disruption, relationship erosion, opportunity reversal and recursive eraser. It’s also extinguished 12 lives, each fully pattern-traced. Each death preventable. They weren’t unstable. They were erased.”
Only one teeny problem. Jabroni Capital asserts that Lewis’ GPT used training data provided by a wiki from the SCP Foundation, where SCP stands for “secure, contain, protect.” Additional information is found on the “About” page.
“The SCP Wiki is a collaborative speculative fiction website about the SCP Foundation, a secretive organization that contains anomalous or supernatural items and entities away from the eyes of the public — or so it may appear.”
Notice those words “speculative fiction”?
While fiction may inspire us to create things in the non-fiction world, fiction in and of itself is not non-fiction.
So if Jabroni Capital is right in claiming that Geoff Lewis’ “discovery” is based upon the SCP Wiki, I don’t think we have anything to worry about.
But others are concerned about Lewis’ mental health, such as Jason Calacanis.
“People are trying to figure out if he’s actually doing performance art here… or if he’s going through an episode. I can’t tell.”
“I wish him well, and I hope somebody explains this. I find it kind of disturbing even to watch it and just to talk about it here… someone needs to get him help.”
OpenAI also weighed in, although I suspect this statement was written by a human.
“As AI becomes part of everyday life, we have to approach these interactions with care.”
Um, maybe you might want to put those disclaimers up front, rather than burying them in terms of service.
I just saw another of those urgent messages. The kind that say: “If you’re depending on social media channels owned by others, you’re a renter, not an owner. Create your own mailing list that you control!”
So this is a good time to remind you that Bredemarket has a mailing list.
No, not the WordPress service where you can receive my blog posts via email.
I’m talking about my MailChimp-managed mailing list with its own content.
In fact, I just sent a new mailing composed entirely on my phone.
Oh, you didn’t see it?
Subscribe so you don’t miss the next one.
https://bredemarket.us2.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=0793a6901095b5080a383ea76&id=f482cef49d