Understand, Adapt, or Create

When Bredemarket begins an engagement with a client, I usually have no idea what processes, templates, or practices the client already has. So I have to handle whatever is or is not there and either understand what is there, adapt it, or create what is needed.

Understand

In some cases clients already have a process.

For example, as I delved into the Sharepoint library for one of Bredemarket’s clients, I found a complete set of branding guidelines that covered logos, colors, and many other aspects of the company’s branding.

In that case, my job is to simply make sure that I align with the client’s branding, and that my content, proposals, and analysis work for the client aligns with the branding guidelines…or with whatever other process the client has.

Adapt

Sometimes the client has a process, but it needs to be adapted in some way.

Here’s an example I can publicly share: not from a Bredemarket client, but from my former employer Motorola (back when Motorola was one company). I was a product manager at the time, and products were developed via a “stage gate” process. At Motorola, of course, it was called M-Gates.

Our “Printrak” group (automated fingerprint identification systems, computer aided dispatch systems, and the like) was the odd group out in our part of Motorola (the part that would later become Motorola Solutions). Most of the people in that part of Motorola sold police radios that were manufactured in bulk. Therefore the stage gate process included a step for a limited production run of police radios before moving to full production.

That didn’t apply for the software we sold to government systems. For example, the entire production run for the Omnitrak 8.1 release was no more than a half dozen systems for customers in Switzerland, Oklahoma, and other places. A limited production run wouldn’t make sense.

So OUR stage gate process eliminated that step and went straight to full production.

Create

And then there are the clients who don’t have anything. In these cases, my invention hat goes on.

For one Bredemarket client, I was asked to develop several pieces of collateral, such as (ironically) one on process maturity, and several random pieces of content tied to a product release.

I decided to approach it more systematically by introducing a simple go-to-market process that defined the external and internal collateral required for a “high” tier product release and a “low” tier product release. Resisting my urge to define something thorough, I simplified the GTM process as much as possible, while still providing guidance on what a product release should contain.

The client rejected the idea: “we don’t need no steenking process.”

Not surprisingly, the process maturity content was never released either.

I’ve had better luck with other Bredemarket clients, defining go-to-market, proposal, and other processes for them as needed.

Be Prepared

Providing product marketing expertise is much more than writing about a product.

Before I write a word of text, I ensure that the content aligns with the client’s strategies…or my own strategies if the client doesn’t have any.

And of course I ask questions.

When Was The Last Time You Repurposed Something?

Did you ever write something and never touch it again?

What a waste.

I remember a time that I wrote a blog post emphasizing that your prospects don’t care about your technology.

Then I created a related landing page about using Bredemarket to create technology content that converts.

Two for the price of one?

Actually more, once you count the entries on the information pages, the podcast, all the social media (even on X), and many other items: 31 in all.

Make it 32, since this is an abbreviated version of my October 2023 post “How I Expanded 1 Idea Into 31 Pieces of Content.”

Thirty-two for the price of one.

See https://bredemarket.com/contact/ to contact me.

Why Biometric Marketing Experience Beats Biometric Marketing Immaturity

I know that the experts say that “too much knowledge is actually bad in tech.” But based upon what I just saw from an (unnamed) identity verification company, I assert that too little knowledge is much worse.

As a biometric product marketing expert and biometric product marketing writer, I pay a lot of attention to how identity verification companies and other biometric and identity companies market themselves. Many companies know how to speak to their prospects…and many don’t.

Take a particular company, which I will not name. Here is the “marketing” from this company.

  • We have funding!
Google Gemini.
  • We offer lower pricing than selected competitors!
  • We claim high facial recognition accuracy but don’t publish our NIST FRTE results! (While the company claims to author its technology, the company name does not appear in either the NIST FRTE 1:1 or NIST FRTE 1:N results.)
  • We claim liveness detection (presentation attack detection) but don’t publish any confirmation letters! (Again, I could not find the company name on the confirmation letter lists from BixeLab or iBeta.)
Google Gemini.

So what is the difference between this company and the other 100+ identity verification companies…many of which explicitly state their benefits, trumpet their NIST FRTE performance, and trumpet their third-party liveness detection confirmation letters?

If you claim great accuracy and great liveness detection but can’t support it via independent third-party verification, your claim is “so what?” worthless. Prove your claims.

Now I’m sure I could help this company. Even if they have none of the certifications or confirmations I mentioned, I could at least get the company to focus on meaningful differentiation and meaningful benefits. But there’s no need to even craft a Bredemarket pitch to the company, since the only marketer on staff is an intern who is indifferent to strategy.

Google Gemini.

Because while many companies assert that all they need is a salesperson, an engineer, an African data labeler, and someone to run the generative AI for everything else…there are dozens of competitors doing the exact same thing.

But some aren’t. Some identity/biometric companies are paying attention to their long-term viability, and are creating content, proposals, and analyses that support that viability.

Take a look at your company’s marketing. Does it speak to prospects? Does it prove that you will meet your customers’ needs? Or does it sound like every other company that’s saying “We use AI. Trust us“?

And if YOUR company needs experienced help in conveying customer-focused benefits to your prospects…contact Bredemarket. I’ve delivered meaningful biometric materials to two dozen companies over the years. And yes, I have experience. Let me use it for your advantage.

Expertise is Everywhere

The Italian baseball players, fueled by espresso, defeated the U.S.

But who can help you defeat your competitors?

The strategic biometric product marketing expert, and…

…the tactical biometric product marketing writer.

Oh, wait…they’re the same person: John E. Bredehoft of Bredemarket.

Expertise is everywhere.

Take the first step to biometric dominance. https://bredemarket.com/mark/

Silence is Golden…For Your Competitors

When we refuse to share our good news…

…and when we refuse to share our bad news…

we allow our competitors to drive the conversation.

Grok.

Don’t surrender your message…and your prospects…to the competition.

Let Bredemarket help you create customer-focused, benefit-oriented content.

Stop losing prospects!

Your Prospects Hate Your Complex Technology

If your product marketing pitch to your prospects concentrates on the complex technology in your product, your prospects KNOW that you don’t get it.

Put yourself in your prospects’ shoes.

Grok video from a Google Gemini image.

Understand the problems your prospects face. Ask questions.

The Seven Questions I Ask.

Demonstrate a customer focus and talk about how your product benefits your customers.

And craft the correct product marketing content.

How Quickly Can Your Competitor Get Its Blog Message Out?

Do you want your company’s message to appear in your blog…someday?

If it’s acceptable to your company to get a message out within 90 days, then don’t even bother to read the rest of this post. It’s going to sound ridiculous to you, and probably pretty scary, and frankly it will seem rather rushed.

But could you put me in contact with your competitors? Because while you’re delaying, your competitors are acting.

And can get messages out within 14 days.

  • (Day 1) Your competitor and its writer decide on the topic, goal, benefits, and target audience (and, if necessary, outline, section sub-goals, relevant examples, and relevant key words/hashtags, and interim and final due dates).
  • (Days 2-4) Then the writer puts a draft together for your competitor’s review, ideally within three calendar days.
  • (Days 5-7) The competitor reviews it, ideally within three calendar days. (Yes, I know that such projects sometimes end up on a company’s back burner and aren’t reviewed until a month later, but what if your competitor is motivated?)
  • (Days 8-10) The writer makes some final changes, again within three days.
  • (Days 11-13) The competitor approves the final changes, again within three days.
  • (Day 14) The competitor loads the text into its blog software, adds any necessary images, creates promotional posts on social media (often the original writer can draft those when they draft the blog post itself)…and THE BLOG POST IS LIVE.

So while you’re deciding when you will decide whether you want to say something, your competitor has already said it.

This is the exact process I follow with my clients with my Bredemarket 400 Short Writing Service.

If your competitor wants to get its message out now rather than later, have your competitor talk to me.

Make sure your competitors know that blogging provides benefits.

And Bredemarket can provide blogging services.

Bredemarket services, process, and pricing.

Why Product Marketers Repeat Themselves

How many times have you seen a SINGLE advertisement for a product or service and IMMEDIATELY rushed out and bought it?

As Email Tool Tester notes, product marketing doesn’t work that way.

[O]ur research suggests that in 2025, the actual number of touchpoints before a sale varies between 1 and 50, depending on the prospect’s buying stage:

  • Inactive customers only need 1–3 touches on average
  • A warm inbound lead will need 5–12 touches
  • A cold prospect can require 20–50 touches

So I came up with a bright idea: just repeat my message: “Identity, biometric, and technology marketing leaders should use Bredemarket’s marketing and writing services for their content, proposal, and analysis needs.”

And repeat it 50 times. (Preferably in a shorter form.)

But before applying my mad copy/paste skillz, I checked…and Email Tool Tester also notes that product marketing doesn’t work that way either. Specifically, you need multiple touchpoints, and multiple TYPES of touchpoints, to ensure your message resonates with your hungry people.

  • Which means that Bredemarket needs to use multiple methods to communicate with my prospects.
22.

But you can repurpose.

  • I recently completed a long piece of content for a client, and flagged six sections that the client can share as shorter pieces of content. That’s seven pieces for the price of one. (And two touchpoints. 48 to go.)
  • But that’s nothing. Once I created 31 pieces of content from a single idea. (Only 19 to go that time.)

And if you’ve seen Bredemarket’s messaging 49 times in the past, now is the time to act and discuss your content, proposal, and/or analysis needs with Bredemarket.