Cody Morelock got himself in trouble with police in Ohio in June.
“Cody Morelock was accused of damaging the camera on Mount Carmel-Tobasco Road near Glenrose Lane on June 13, according to Union Township police.
“Investigators alleged Morelock removed bolts securing the camera system, bringing down the camera, solar panel and support pole before destroying the equipment.”
Oh, and one more thing. The camera was a Flock Safety camera.
Morelock was identified by other cameras, and his case was brought before a grand jury. (I don’t know why it went to a grand jury rather than having a district attorney file charges directly. Someone enlighten me.)
The grand jury took a surprising action.
“A Clermont County grand jury declined to indict Morelock on felony charges.”
Huh? There was evidence that suggested Morelock did the deed, and the grand jury said, “So what?” Which is rare; grand juries usually indict.
Now theoretically the prosecutor can bring the case before another grand jury, or could directly file charges and bypass the grand jury altogether. But the actions of THIS grand jury suggest that the DA might not get a conviction. And DAs hate to lose.
And Flock Safety probably wouldn’t file a civil case against Morelock. The damage was around $1,000, and it would cost much more than that to file.
So we’re going to see trending stories about destroying Flock Safety cameras—if not total destruction, then less lethal actions such as bagging the cameras.

Maybe it will become a TikTok challenge.

