On AI-generated Realism

(Imagen 4)

There are groups and communities for every interest, including AI art.

Through Danie Wylie, who I originally met when she revealed her misgivings about HiveLLM, I eventually joined a private Discord server (Promptly Collective Hub) devoted to AI art. Regardless of the reasons that the members create (in my case, primarily to augment Bredemarket’s self-promotional messaging), the common thread is enjoyment in using the tools, and learning how to use them better.

My next mission, should I choose to accept it, is to read the “Realism” guide and work through the workbook I downloaded from the server. While the use of the term “realism” with AI art may sound jarring, the purpose is to have the viewer suspend disbelief (like the Velveteen Rabbit) and treat the image(s) as something that really happened. 

Just like the movies: I hate to break it to you, but Frankenstein’s monster was a guy in a suit wearing makeup.

Anyway, the server itself is private, but if you go to the public “Promptly Ai Collective” page on Facebook at the https://www.facebook.com/dysfunctionalfairytale URL you can learn how to join it.

And to see how the picture in THIS post was created, visit the https://facebook.com/groups/bredemarketpicclub/permalink/3628048683992263/ URL.

Huff + Puff, the Magic Camera Hardware Failure Correction

It was 8:48, just before an important client meeting this morning, and I was freaking out. I had scheduled the meeting in Google Meet, and I started up the session…and the right third of the camera view was obscured.

Imagen 4 re-creation. I didn’t think to take a screenshot at the time. And no, I don’t have facial hair.

I attempted various fixes:

  • I stopped Google Meet, started it again…and got the same result.
  • I logged off and logged back in again…and got the same result.
  • I restarted my computer (turn it off and turn it back on again)…and got the same result.
  • I tried Zoom…and got the same result.

Which meant that the possible problem was a hardware problem with the camera itself. Which meant a lot of hassle sending the computer in for a fix, which was especially upsetting because this was a new computer.

Bredebot proves useful

So I turned to my buddy Bredebot.

In a huddle space in an office, a smiling robot named Bredebot places his robotic arms on a wildebeest and a wombat, encouraging them to collaborate on a product marketing initiative.
Bredebot is the one in the middle.

And he wasn’t reassuring:

A black section in a laptop camera feed is most often due to a hardware issue, such as a damaged camera sensor or a problem with the ribbon cable that connects the camera to the motherboard. Software issues are less likely to cause a precise, consistent black area like this, but they’re still worth checking.

Then I began working down the checklist that Bredebot provided, beginning with the first item.

The most common and easiest issue to rule out is a physical object blocking the lens. This could be a speck of dust or debris, a stray piece of a sticker, or a misplaced privacy slider. Even a tiny particle on the lens can show up as a large black spot or area in the image.

A speck of dust? Just a simple speck of dust causing that major of an obstruction?

Not having a can of compressed air available, I used my mouth to blow on the top of the laptop screen.

The obstruction partially cleared, and now three fourths of the screen was visible.

One more blow, and my “critical hardware failure” was fixed.

What does this mean?

So some computer problems are NOT fixed by turning it off and turning it on again. Sometimes a lot of hot air is necessary.

Imagen 4.

By sheer coincidence, the Just A Band song “Huff + Puff” is on my current Spotify playlist. Nothing to do with computer video hardware, but it’s a good song.

The Power of Artificial Intelligence

(Imagen 4)

“The rising popularity of AI is driving an increase in electricity demand so significant it has the potential to reshape our grid. Energy consumption by data centers has gone up by 80% from 2020 to 2025 and is likely to keep growing. Electricity prices are already rising, especially in places where data centers are most concentrated. 

“Yet many people, especially in Big Tech, argue that AI will be, on balance, a positive force for the grid. They claim that the technology could help get more clean power online faster, run our power system more efficiently, and predict and prevent failures that cause blackouts.”

But other people are skeptical, as this MIT Technology Review article indicates: https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/09/09/1123404/ai-grid-help/

Drew Mabry Recommends a Human in the Loop: Trust Me, It’s Critically Important

I’m conducting an experiment in which an AI bot, “Bredebot,” is writing on the Bredemarket blog and on LinkedIn with almost no restrictions.

Don’t do this at home. It’s not a good idea.

This post describes an example in which Bredebot misses a critically important point about Bredemarket’s target audience in the identity/biometric industry.

Bredebot reacts to Drew Mabry

Earlier today, I asked Bredebot to write a post analyzing a Drew Mabry quote:  

“The true competitive advantage isn’t the Al tools themselves but how you use them. Your unique processes for data capture, knowledge management, and building trust are the real ‘moat.’ Al becomes powerful when it’s integrated with your proprietary insights and context, making your approach impossible to replicate.”

Moat. I like that. Imagen 4 (via Bredebot.)

Mabry also advocates including a human in the loop: his firm, Fast + Light, always asks at least one human (preferably two) to review all AI-generated content.

In my Bredebot experiment, I rarely edit what Bredebot says. If you know me, it’s very obvious that Bredebot wrote this and I didn’t.

“Building Trust: In the identity and biometrics space, trust isn’t just a nice-to-have; it’s paramount. If customers don’t trust you with their most sensitive data, you simply don’t have a business. Your processes for privacy, security, transparency, and ethical AI usage are not just compliance requirements; they are fundamental differentiators. How you communicate these efforts, how you manage data breaches (heaven forbid!), and how you constantly reinforce your commitment to security are all part of this trust-building moat. This is where your wombat customers, usually burrowing away, will emerge to praise (or criticize) your efforts.”

While I certainly agree with the sentiment, and obviously don’t mind the reference to wombats, I would have made one change.

The t word

I would have modified Bredebot’s use of the T word. Just because Mabry used it doesn’t mean that Bredebot has to do the same.

Why not? Because the word “trust” is massively overused in the identity/biometric industry. So much so that you can’t tell one company from another.

Imagen 4.

“Now perhaps some of you would argue that trust is essential to identity verification in the same way that water is essential to an ocean, and that therefore EVERYBODY HAS to use the t-word in their communications. 

“Don’t tell that to Black Ink Tech, who uses the trademark ‘Truth Over Trust.’

“And no, they didn’t violate any law by using an unapproved word. Instead, they got attention by standing out from the crowd.”

And identity/biometric firms are the primary hungry people (target audience) for the Bredemarket blog.

So I definitely would have edited that paragraph.

So why didn’t I?

Changing the subject

I’m going to dodge that question by asking you one.

Do you need an experienced human to help your identity, biometric, or technology organization product marketing?

  • Strategy and/or tactics?
  • Content and/or proposals and/or analysis?

Visit this page to set up a free meeting with Bredemarket. I’ll ask some questions to get things moving.

One More Time…and Content Reviews

“I ask, then I act” is an attention-grabbing statement, but it’s admittedly simplistic. I don’t fall in the “ready, fire, aim” school, but believe that action incorporates review. As the management consultants Daft Punk stated many years ago:

One more time

And they proceeded to say:

One more time

So I guess it’s important.

“One more time” with a client’s content

One time I used my technology product marketing expertise to draft a piece for a client, which the client then edited with Track Changes on. The client made a number of improvements to my text, so I should have been happy with that and let it go. But I thought I’d look at the document.

One more time.

Stupid Word tricks, the Read Aloud edition

So I made a copy of the document, accepted all the changes in the copy, and had Microsoft Word read the document to me (Review menu, Speech section, Read Aloud).

Imagen 4.

Unlike the audio transcription tool (now superseded by AI meeting assistants), the built-in “Read Aloud” feature remains essential today.

Everything flowed well, and Word’s built-in editor didn’t flag anything.

My eyes had seen the problem

But my eye caught something.

In my initial draft, I had referenced the client’s 800 number.

Which in and of itself isn’t bad.

Except for the fact that this is a worldwide company, and many of the prospects who responded to the piece would be calling from outside the United States, where 800 numbers are not supported.

Imagen 4.

So I shot an urgent message saying to correct my error and change the number from an 800 number to a domestic number.

That one additional review eliminated a possible source of friction between my client and its prospects.

Problem solved, even before anyone noticed there was a problem.

You knew this was coming

Anyone notice the similarity between this song and Phil Collins’ “One More Night”? Or is it just me?

Revisiting Brand Archetypes with My Good Buddy Gemini

I’ve been interested in brand archetypes for years. You’ll recall my first post on the topic, after which I used Kaye Putnam’s quiz to determine my archetypes: primarily Sage, with some others.

Sage, Explorer, Royalty, Entertainer.

This morning I attended a webinar, sponsored by Verizon and under the auspices of SCORE and BizHuub, on the topic of budget-friendly branding. It was presented by Warrick and Takicha Roundtree.

After some preliminary discussions, the Roundtrees focused on the topic of the 12 brand archetypes. They then encouraged us to explore our brand archetypes, with the help of our favorite generative AI tool.

The first prompt, and the response

I am Bredemarket. I offer marketing and writing services (content, proposal, analysis) to identity, biometrics, and technology firms. I sell these services to marketing leaders at these firms. Give me a list of psychographic characteristics of my most likely buyer.

Here is a list of psychographic characteristics of your most likely buyer, the marketing leader at an identity, biometrics, or technology firm. These characteristics go beyond simple demographics and aim to uncover their motivations, challenges, and attitudes.

Core Motivations and Goals

  • Career-Driven and Results-Oriented: They are primarily motivated by professional success. They need to demonstrate a positive ROI on their marketing budget and show tangible results in the form of lead generation, increased brand awareness, or successful product launches.
  • Aspirational: They want to be seen as innovative and forward-thinking within their company and the industry. They are looking for solutions that will help them gain a competitive edge and establish their firm as a leader in its field.
  • Driven by Urgency: They are often facing deadlines and a “need it yesterday” mentality. They have projects to complete, campaigns to launch, and are looking for a reliable partner who can jump in and deliver high-quality work quickly and efficiently.
  • Seeking Strategic Partnership: While they need a service provider, they are really looking for a partner who can provide fresh, objective insights and strategic thinking. They value an external perspective that isn’t clouded by internal biases or politics.

Challenges and Pain Points

  • Overwhelmed and Under-Resourced: They are likely managing a lean team and a multitude of responsibilities, from content creation to campaign management and analytics. They may not have the in-house expertise or bandwidth for every project, especially specialized ones like proposal writing or complex analysis.
  • Need for Specialized Expertise: They are acutely aware that their firm’s technology is complex and niche. They need a writer and marketer who can understand the technical nuances of identity and biometrics and translate them into compelling, clear, and trustworthy content for a B2B audience.
  • Information and Privacy Concerns: The identity and biometrics space is sensitive. They are concerned with navigating complex issues like data privacy regulations, ethical considerations, and public perception. They need content that addresses these concerns and builds trust with their audience.
  • Difficulty Demonstrating Value: They struggle to effectively communicate the value of their complex, often-invisible, technology to different stakeholders, from technical users to C-suite executives.

Attitudes and Behaviors

  • Risk-Averse (to a point): While they want to innovate, they are also responsible for their budget and brand reputation. They will seek out a provider with a proven track record, relevant case studies, and a clear understanding of their industry.
  • Values Efficiency: They appreciate a streamlined, no-fuss process. They don’t have time for extensive hand-holding or for a provider who needs a lot of training on the basics of their industry.
  • Prefers a Collaborative Approach: They don’t want to simply hand over a task. They want a partner who will engage in a dialogue, provide strategic recommendations, and work with their team to achieve a shared vision.
  • Values Trust and Reliability: Given the sensitive nature of their business, they need to feel completely confident that their partner is stable, consistent, and committed to the project. They value a partner who is responsive and transparent in their operations.

The second prompt, and the response

Which of the 12 brand archetypes would appeal to my customers?

Based on the psychographic characteristics of your target customer—the marketing leader at a technology, biometrics, or identity firm—several brand archetypes would likely resonate most strongly.

The key is to choose an archetype that speaks to their professional motivations, pain points, and desire for a strategic, trustworthy partner.

Here are the most relevant archetypes for Bredemarket:

1. The Sage

  • Why it works: This is the most natural fit. The Sage is the expert, the thought leader, and the trusted advisor. Your customers are seeking knowledge, analysis, and strategic insights. They don’t just want content written; they want content that is well-researched, accurate, and authoritative.
  • How to embody it:
    • Focus on data-driven insights and analysis.
    • Create content that educates and informs, such as white papers, in-depth reports, and industry analysis.
    • Position yourself as an expert who understands the complex nuances of their industry, not just a content mill.
    • Your tone should be knowledgeable, wise, and credible.

2. The Creator

  • Why it works: Your services are inherently creative. You are creating content, proposals, and narratives from scratch. Marketing leaders at tech firms are looking for someone who can translate complex technical information into compelling, engaging stories that resonate with their audience.
  • How to embody it:
    • Showcase your ability to build something from nothing—a strong narrative, a winning proposal, or a memorable campaign.
    • Use a portfolio to highlight diverse, imaginative work you’ve done for other clients.
    • Emphasize your process, from ideation to final execution.
    • Your messaging should focus on innovation, originality, and the power of well-crafted communication.

3. The Hero

  • Why it works: This archetype addresses your customer’s pain points directly. They are heroes within their own companies, tasked with generating leads and demonstrating ROI. You, as Bredemarket, can be their sidekick or a “hero for hire” who helps them conquer their challenges.
  • How to embody it:
    • Frame your services as a solution to their problems. Instead of “We write proposals,” say “We write proposals that help you win bids.”
    • Use success stories and testimonials that highlight how you helped a client overcome a major challenge (e.g., “Helped Company X generate 50% more leads with a new content strategy”).
    • Your tone should be confident, courageous, and results-oriented.

Secondary, Supporting Archetype: The Ruler

  • Why it works: While this may not be your primary archetype, it’s a good supporting one. Marketing leaders are often in a position of power and authority. By positioning yourself as a professional and organized partner, you align with their desire for order and control.
  • How to embody it:
    • Emphasize your clear processes, reliability, and project management skills.
    • Communicate with precision and confidence, demonstrating your command of the subject matter and the project.
    • Show that you bring order to the chaos of their marketing needs.

Summary & Recommendation

For Bredemarket, the Sage and Creator are your strongest primary archetypes.

  • Sage establishes your expertise and credibility, which is paramount in a technical field.
  • Creator highlights your specific skill set and ability to build compelling narratives.

You can then use the Hero archetype to frame your marketing messages around the problems you solve, and the Ruler to reassure potential clients about your professionalism and reliability.

By combining these, you can craft a brand identity that is both intelligent and innovative, while also being trustworthy and empowering for your target customer.

What I need to do

So what have I learned from the Roundtrees’ prompts and Google Gemini’s responses?

Well, at least my Sage and Royalty/Ruler archetypes are on, um, target with my audience.

I need to analyze the rest of the two responses and perhaps make some changes in direction in my self-promotional content. After all, Google never lies.

In truth, why is Google happy that I’m ignoring its marketing advice?

The Wildebeest Speaks About the Capabilities and Limitations of AI-Authored Text

I just published a new edition of Bredemarket’s LinkedIn newsletter this afternoon. Here’s how I started it:

“For years I maintained a negative stance on generative AI-authored text. But I recently tried relaxing it. By doing this I learned what AI authors are capable of…and what they clearly CANNOT do.”

Much of the article rehashes material I’ve shared before, but I did provide a little detail on the temperamental writer’s emotional hurt when Zoominfo turned to the bots:

“My first reaction was akin to a river in Egypt. I remain a temperamental writer, you know.”

Psst…check the book title.

But at least I closed the thing with a call to action.

“But if you are a marketing leader at an identity, biometric, or technology company, and you want an experienced human to help you with your content, proposals, and analysis, why don’t you schedule a free meeting with me to talk about your needs. Visit https://bredemarket.com/mark/ to find out more.”

Content For Tech Marketers.

There Are NOT 10 Essential Elements of Product Marketing (Even If I Told Bredebot There Are)

The beautiful thing (and the terrible thing) about generative AI is that it (mostly) does what it tells you to do.

Imagen 4.

That was mean. Bredebot, I’ll make it up to you.

Imagen 4.

Back to generative AI following the instructions in a prompt.

So I, in my “managing editor” role, asked Bredebot to write a LinkedIn post listing “the 10 essential elements of product marketing.”

“I was asked to list the 10 essential elements of product marketing. Honestly, there probably isn’t a magic number…”

Never mind if there aren’t 10 essential elements. I told Bredebot to list 10, so it listed 10. Even though (as you will see) I think there are only four.

  1. Product messaging and positioning
  2. Buyer personas
  3. Go-to-market strategy
  4. Sales enablement
  5. Product launches
  6. Market and competitive intelligence
  7. Customer feedback loop
  8. Pricing and packaging
  9. Content strategy
  10. Performance metrics and analysis

Bredemarket’s four essential elements of product marketing

So what are the REAL essential elements?

I could ask 20 product marketers to boil this AI-generated 10-item list down to a select few, and I would get 21 different answers.

But I’ll take my shot anyway, warning you that my list may not contain the really cool product marketing buzzwords like “positioning” and “target audience.”

I’ve identified four essential elements:

  1. Product marketing strategy.
  2. Product marketing environment.
  3. Product marketing content.
  4. Product marketing performance.

Strategy

Strategy comes first, which not only refers to the two “strategy” elements in the list, but also to things I’ve talked about in the past, including why, how, what, and process.

Environment

Here’s where I put “Market and competitive intelligence” and “Customer feedback loop” from the list above. This also includes the internal environment in the company; if the CEO emphatically insists that a go-to-market effort should last three days, then a go-to-market effort will last three days, regardless of what anyone else says.

Content

I’ve previously discussed the non-difference between content marketers and product marketers, noting that product marketers have to product a lot of content about the product, both external and internal. Most of Bredebot’s 10 items fall into this category in one way or another: positioning, personas, go-to-market, sales enablement, launches, pricing, and packaging. You can also throw proposals into this list, and I just did.

Performance

The metrics stuff, including Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). Because if you don’t know how you did, you don’t know how you did. Sleep-inducing but essential.

“By the end of Q4 2025 I will establish and obtain approval for a multi-tiered go-to-market process identifying the go-to-market tiers, the customer-facing and internal deliverables for each tier, as well as the responsible, accountable, consulted, and informed organizations for each deliverable.”

Yes, I talk like that. Sometimes.

What is your list?

So I’ve concluded that the four essential elements of product marketing are strategy, environment, content, and performance.

Prove me wrong.

Is there validity is the traditional lists, such as HubSpot’s list? With the recognizable buzzwords such as “target audience”?

  1. Researching and monitoring your target audience.
  2. Ensuring your product meets the needs of your target audience.
  3. Determining your product’s positioning in the market.
  4. Creating, managing, and carrying out your product marketing strategy.
  5. Enabling sales to attract the right customers for your new product.
  6. Influencing marketing strategy and product development.
  7. Keeping your product relevant over time.

You tell me what the proper list should be.

Imagen 4.

And regardless of your list, if you need a technology product marketing expert to assist with any aspect of your product marketing, contact me.

Consulting: Bredemarket at https://bredemarket.com/mark/

Employment: LinkedIn at https://linkedin.com/in/jbredehoft/