How Do People Learn About UiPath’s Agentic AI Advances? Marketing.

(Picture from LinkedIn)

I’ve consistently believed that when a company is in trouble, it pares down to three key elements:

  • Engineers to create the product.
  • Salespeople to drive the sales of the product.
  • Executives, because they’re always critically important and can never be let go, can they?

Actually I’m kidding about the last one. There are plenty of cases where executives, and even company founders, determined that they were no longer affordable and left their own companies.

But many companies realize that engineers and salespeople aren’t enough, and they actually hire product marketers and other marketers.

Take UiPath, which self-identifies as “a global leader in agentic automation, empowering enterprises to harness the full potential of AI agents to autonomously execute and optimize complex business processes.”

It just hired a new Chief Marketing Officer (CMO): Michael Atalla, previously of Microsoft, F5, and other tech firms.

And hopefully he’ll remove “improve outcomes” from future press releases.

Michael, if you need any other tips, or if your existing marketing staff is overworked and needs outside assistance, let me know.

“Somewhat You Why” and Geolocation Stalkerware

Geolocation and “somewhat you why” (my proposed sixth factor of identity verification and authentication) can not only be used to identify and authenticate people.

They can also be used to learn things about people already authenticated, via the objects they might have in their possession.

Stalkerware

404 Media recently wrote an article about “stalkerware” geolocation tools that vendors claim can secretly determine if your partner is cheating on you.

Before you get excited about them, 404 Media reveals that many of these tools are NOT secret.

“Immediately notifies anyone traveling with it.” (From a review)

Three use cases for geolocation tracking

But let’s get back to the tool, and the intent. Because I maintain that intent makes all the difference. Look at these three use cases for geolocation tracking of objects:

  • Tracking an iPhone (held by a person). Many years ago, an iPhone user had to take a long walk from one location to another after dark. This iPhone user asked me to track their whereabouts while on that walk. Both of us consented to the arrangement.
  • Tracking luggage. Recently, passengers have placed AirTags in their luggage before boarding a flight. This lets the passengers know where their luggage is at any given time. But some airlines were not fans of the practice:

“Lufthansa created all sorts of unnecessary confusion after it initially banned AirTags out of concern that they are powered by a lithium battery and could emit radio signals and potentially interfere with aircraft navigation.

“The FAA put an end to those baseless concerns saying, “Luggage tracking devices powered by lithium metal cells that have 0.3 grams or less of lithium can be used on checked baggage”.   The Apple AirTag battery is a third of that size and poses no risk to aircraft operation.”

  • Tracking an automobile. And then there’s the third case, raised by the 404 Media article. 404 Media found countless TikTok advertisements for geolocation trackers with pitches such as “men with cheating wives, you might wanna get one of these.” As mentioned above, the trackers claim to be undetectable, which reinforces the fact that the person whose car is being tracked did NOT consent.

From consent to stalkerware, and the privacy implications

Geolocation technologies are used in every instance. But in one case it’s perfectly acceptable, while it’s less acceptable in the other two cases.

Banning geolocation tracking technology would be heavy-handed since it would prevent legitimate, consent-based uses of the technology.

So how do we set up the business and technical solutions that ensure that any tracking is authorized by all parties?

Does your firm offer a solution that promotes privacy? Do you need Bredemarket’s help to tell prospects about your solution? Contact me.

How L-1 Identity Solutions Came To Be

(Imagen 4. Not an exaggeration.)

The history of L-1 Identity Solutions has always fascinated me. I dealt with then-bitter enemies Digital Biometrics and Identix while I was at Printrak, with Viisage while I was at Motorola, and de facto competed with MorphoTrust while I was at MorphoTrak…until MorphoTrust in effect acquired MorphoTrak when IDEMIA NSS was set up and I reported to a supervisor in Massachusetts.

I used to have a PowerPoint presentation that traced the family tree of all of L-1’s acquisitions. Wish I still had it. But here’s a little taste of where things stood before Joseph Atick and Robert LaPenta started combining things:

  • Identix, while making some efforts in the AFIS market, concentrated on creating live scan fingerprinting machines, where it competed (sometimes in court) against companies such as Digital Biometrics and Bioscrypt.
  • The fingerprint companies started to compete against facial recognition companies, including Viisage and Visionics
  • Oh, and there were also iris companies such as Iridian
  • And there were other ways to identify people. Even before 9/11 mandated REAL ID (which we may get any year now), Polaroid was making great efforts to improve driver’s licenses to serve as a reliable form of identification.

(Some former links are dead and were removed from the bullets above. But the Digital Biometrics-Identix court case is described here, and Polaroid’s history with driver’s licenses in Utah is described here.)

Back in 2023 I assembled a list of “Five Topics a Biometric Content Marketing Expert Needs to Understand.” My fifth topic was “How L-1 Identity Solutions came to be.” I claimed I was half joking, but in reality I was completely serious. Despite similar efforts by HID and others (including IDEMIA), the sheer number of companies that combined to form L-1 remains unmatched.

All five.

The Former Friend Who Fundamentally Focused Bredemarket’s Instagram Account

Have you ever had a friendship end and felt a shift in your online life? A former friend’s actions completely focused the direction of the Bredemarket Instagram account. This experience reshaped the content I shared, and refocused the audience who received it.

Nap Time.

Those who were reading the Bredemarket Instagram account over a month ago may have caught my disappointment at something I discovered among my followers.

Or more accurately, someONE whom I DIDN’T discover among my followers.

“Someone I respect unsubscribed from the Bredemarket Instagram page. Not sure why or how I turned them away.”

So I “took a nap,” pausing most Bredemarket Instagram activities for a week.

But over time I remembered what Alfred, Lord Tennyson never said: ‘Tis better to have subscribed and unsubscribed than never to have subscribed at all. (I’ll get to the latter group later.)

Reshaping the content

Admittedly some aspects of my Instagram account could alienate some people. As I took my Instagram “nap,” I pondered whether to put the wildebeests out to pasture, and whether to consign the 1980s music to a garbage can filled with cassettes and 8-tracks. After all, the so-called “experts” say that TRENDING AUDIO increases engagement.

Maybe for the “experts”…but not necessarily for Bredemarket.

After all, any perceptive person who is interested in me and my 30 years of identity/biometric experience will realize that I would enjoy songs that are 30 years old…or older.

So I doubled down.

OK, maybe I announced my “waking up” with a Flo Rida / David Guetta song.

But pretty soon I was back to Thomas Dolby, the theme of the Law & Order TV show, and Tina Turner.

The National Bureau of Standards would approve.

Refocusing the audience

After I reshaped my content, I took a long hard look at who was and wasn’t reading it.

And discovered that I was subscribed to hundreds of people on Instagram who, unlike my former friend, NEVER subscribed to me in the first place. And thus never saw a word I wrote. Or the accompanying audio: David Guetta, Thomas Dolby, or “Royalty Free Music Background.”

Did you notice my use of the word “was”?

Like my former friend, I did a lot of unsubscribing myself, reducing the list of people I read by hundreds.

Because, at least on Instagram, I focused my energy.

Focus Your Energy.

Speak Softly? Is Theodore Roosevelt’s Advice Still Relevant?

So I just created a short reel for no purpose other than to illustrate Theodore Roosevelt’s famous saying “Speak softly and carry a big stick.”

But then I began thinking. For product marketers, is “speaking softly” an idea that should be relegated to the early 20th century? The answer to that question partially depends on whether you are marketing in an earlier awareness stage, or a later conversion stage.

But the reel doesn’t get that deep.

Speak softly.

An aside (overly serious product marketers skip this part)

Originally this reel was supposed to be a single image, with no stick, showing President Roosevelt to the audio accompaniment of Paul Simon’s “Loves Me Like a Rock.”

Who do you think you’re fooling?

To be honest, ORIGINALLY the President was supposed to be Nixon, whose mama loved him and was a saint.

But once Roosevelt got behind the Presidential podium, my mind traveled to earlier times in the Dakotas and Cuba, and the stick—softly—inserted itself.

Excluded from the reel but not forgotten: my earlier fictional conception of Roosevelt overseeing the construction of the Panama Canal, previously shared here.

A man, a plan…

And if you haven’t already figured it out, Teddy appears to be safe from the restrictions from Google’s guidelines on depictions of famous figures. As I said before, no picture generation of President Richard Nixon, or President Taylor Swift.

But it doesn’t matter with me now, because this post can’t just be about silly pictures. It has to have a Serious Business Purpose.

For product marketers, does speaking softly work?

So let’s talk about Roosevelt’s phrase that inspired the reel.

First, the full phrase is “Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.”

Second, the phrase was not original to Roosevelt. Well-read people learn from their reading, and Roosevelt picked up the phrase from elsewhere.

“This quote often attributed to Theodore Roosevelt is actually a West African proverb. Roosevelt writes this in a letter to Henry Sprague on January 26, 1900.”

A year and a half later, after Roosevelt’s political enemies had maneuvered him into the then-obscure position of Vice President of the United States (subsequently characterized as a bucket of warm…spit), he expounded upon the phrase at the Minnesota State Fair on September 2, 1901.

Deep fried pizza on a stick. Not historically accurate.

(He and his political enemies had no way of knowing that later that month McKinley would be assassinated and Roosevelt would be President. Oops.)

“”Speak softly and carry a big stick—you will go far.” If a man continually blusters, if he lacks civility, a big stick will not save him from trouble; and neither will speaking softly avail, if back of the softness there does not lie strength, power. In private life there are few things more obnoxious than the man who is always loudly boasting; and if the boaster is not prepared to back up his words his position becomes absolutely contemptible. So it is with the nation. It is both foolish and undignified to indulge in undue self-glorification, and above all, in loose-tongued denunciation of other peoples.”

As Roosevelt noted, the “and” it’s important. A soft speaker without a big stick will not be persuasive.

But is speaking softly all that important?

Speaking loudly: Berliners, Crazy Eddie

There are certainly instances, both in diplomacy/politics and product marketing, in which speaking loudly is extremely effective. Avoiding the 21st century (we really don’t want to go there) and confining myself to the 20th, the masses of people at the Berlin Wall were very loud.

9 November 1989.

As was the radio guy (Jerry Carroll) who played in the Crazy Eddie commercials.

Insane!

Let’s face it; product marketing is often loud to grab your attention. I should know.

Bridge your content gap.

Speaking softly: Theodore Roosevelt, golfers

But sometimes, even in an awareness campaign, speaking softly is an effective differentiator against the loud cacophony of everyone else.

Tell your story.

And by the time you move to the conversion stage, you don’t want to be loud and blustery. I’m prevented by NDA from citing personal examples, so let’s look at Theodore Roosevelt again.

“The Treaty of Portsmouth formally ended the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–05. The negotiations took place in August in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and were brokered in part by U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt….Although the actual importance of Roosevelt’s mediation and personal pressure on the leadership in Moscow and Tokyo to the final agreement is unclear, he won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts in moderating the talks and pushing toward peace.”

Of course, everyone knew that negotiations were taking place in Portsmouth, just like everyone knew that Egypt and Israel were negotiating at Camp David 70+ years later.

But sometimes the negotiating parties speak so softly that no one knows they’re talking. Take this announcement in June 2023:

“The world of golf was left stunned on Tuesday as the PGA Tour, DP World Tour and rival Saudi-backed LIV circuit, who have been involved in a bitter fight that has split the sport, announced a shock agreement to merge and form one unified commercial entity….The bombshell announcement was slammed by many PGA Tour players who were left in the dark about the merger…”

Not historically accurate. I don’t think.

For the moment, ignore the fact that the merger hasn’t happened two years later. The heated war between the PGA and the LIV meant that while a merger made financial sense (see the NFL and the AFL bidding up football player prices in the 1960s), no one expected a PGA-LIV merger to happen.

But the rival parties had spoken…softly.

I Love You, I Pay Your Rent

“Think about it – If you can’t fix it, mod it, or sell it without someone else’s permission… Did you ever really own it?

“Every example we’ve seen so far points to the same reality: the balance of power has shifted. You pay for the device or software, but they decide how it works, what it can do, and how long it will last.

“This isn’t just inconvenient – it’s a slow erosion of freedom and control.”

From “The Death of Ownership: Why Your Tech Isn’t Really Yours Anymore” by Mohib Ur Rehman (SK Nexus, Substack)

https://open.substack.com/pub/sknexus/p/the-death-of-ownership-in-tech

Tell Your Product’s Story With Bredemarket

Bredemarket helps tech marketers tell your product’s story.

5 employers and 20+ product marketing consulting clients have used my words.

I ask, then I act to showcase your tech product.

Book a free meeting to learn more: https://bredemarket.com/mark/

Tell your story.