From the Department of Unintended Consequences: different countries approach identity proofing in different ways. But what happens when the underlying assumptions disappear and make some identity proofing methods obsolete?
Identity proofing in the United States
In the United States, the primary public identity document for citizens and non-citizens is the driver’s license. These government identity documents, issued by individual states and territories, satisfy a variety of uses, including driving, buying alcohol, boarding a plane or entering a federal facility (eventually), or purchasing something.
There are two other common identity documents in the United States:
- The passport. But not everybody has one.
- The Social Security card. But this is like your underwear; you don’t show it to everybody.
So our de facto identity card in this country is the driver’s license, or an equivalent ID document issued by a motor vehicle agency. Even though driver’s licenses are used for a ton of purposes that have nothing to do with driving, the entire ecosystem for these IDs is driven by the needs of drivers.
Which is a smart idea, because just about everybody needs a driver’s license.
Right?
What I’m reading
I read a number of WordPress blogs, and one of the ones that I read has the title “The Last Driver License Holder…“
The abstract for the blog completes the sentence and clarifies it.
“…is already born. How Waymo, Tesla, Zoox & Co will change our automotive society and make mobility safer, more affordable and accessible in urban as well as rural areas.”
It’s certainly a provocative statement, especially if you’re a recent college graduate who just joined the California DMV and thought you were set for life. You’re not.
Even if the author’s conclusion is a complete exaggeration, we need to entertain the possibility that driverless automobiles may eventually improve so much that people won’t even need a driver’s license, except for the cranky few that want them.
Assume that the majority of people own driverless cars at some point in the future, and that these support complete automation with no driver intervention. Imagine the ripple effects:
- The government motor vehicle agencies, who will be more than busy certifying the road worthiness of new automobiles, will start wondering why they are spending so much time issuing these IDs that no one uses.
- Other agencies at the state and federal level, eager to expand their operations and budgets, will start asking why the motor vehicle agencies are the ones in charge of IDs, and why they should be providing IDs instead.
- While the agencies fight this out, private companies that provide adult services such as alcohol, prostitution, pornography, and buying gardening implements will have to figure out how to ensure their customers are old enough for these services. Perhaps they will be forced to turn to age estimation because the person at the counter never bothered to get a driver’s license.
So now half the people don’t bother to get IDs, yet they still need IDs.
Now what?