Razor and Blades as a Service: HP Instant Ink

You know the razor and blades business model, where you can buy the razor very cheaply, and then you spend a lot of money over the years buying the blades.

Of course, this business model also applies to other complementary products, such as game consoles and video games, and printers and ink.

Ink as a Service

And companies can extend the business model. Rather than buying individual razor blades, video games, and ink cartridges, you can obtain the complementary products “as a Service.”

For example, HP Instant Ink:

“HP Instant Ink is the hassle-free, money-saving ink subscription service that automatically delivers ink only when you’re running low. Plans start at $1.79 a month.”

Of course that price assumes you only print 10 pages a month, but whatever.

I won’t dwell on the specifics on the plan (charging by the page rather than the ink used, reducing your privacy by letting HP and whoever else know when you print 900 pages, etc.). 

Vendor benefits from as a Service

But I will note that HP instant Ink has the same vendor advantage as any other “as a Service” offering:

Increased customer lock-in.

I will speak from my own experience. 

  • When my company sold on-premise solutions to government agencies, they paid from their capital budget and the contract was for a fixed term. After 5 or 7 years or whatever when the contract term expired, the agency’s hardware would be antiquated and it would have to go out to bid again.
  • Later, when my company sold cloud solutions, there was more budgetary flexibility. Some agencies didn’t have to use capital funds; this was a service, after all. And if the vendor was really fortunate, there was no contract term limit either, so the agency could stay with the vendor forever. Obsolescence wasn’t an issue because Amazon or Microsoft took care of that behind the scenes.

HP Instant Ink isn’t a perfect parallel, since it doesn’t include obsolete printer replacement. (But it could.) But the Ink as a Service (IaaS) offering certainly helps lock you in to HP…and to using HP ink rather than third-party ink.

And it’s yet another move from people owning things to people licensing things.

But if it provides a benefit (HP Instant Ink claims “up to” 50% cost savings), then it may be worthwhile.

(Imagen 3)

Identity Orchestration, Integration, and Vendor Count

If you come from the musical world rather than the technology world, then “orchestration” suggests a collection of instruments, such as the Bucharest Symphony Orchestra (CC BY-SA 4.0 for those keeping score).

But in the technology world, “orchestration” knits different applications together. As far as I’m concerned, the most notable example is identity orchestration, the topic of a recent Biometric Update post by Chris Burt.

Different apps, different identity systems

I won’t go into Chris Burt’s identity orchestration examples from Ping Identity and Strata Identity, but I’d like to delve into a Productiv survey cited by IBM.

“According to one report, the average business department uses 87 different SaaS apps. These apps often have their own identity systems, which might not readily integrate with one another. As a result, many organizations deal with fragmented identity landscapes and awkward user experiences.”

It’s tough enough to get a bunch of different apps to work together. It’s even tougher when each of those apps has its own identity system, which may be incompatible with the identity systems from the other apps.

You can’t get all your SaaS apps from one vendor

How do some SaaS vendors approach the problem?

By telling you to buy a single multi-functional solution from them.

The only problem is that for medium and large organizations, no single vendor can provide ALL the functionality the organization needs.

So you STILL have to stitch things together.

Because identity orchestration, unlike musical orchestration, is not under the direct control of a single conductor.

Mickey Mouse and Leopold Stokowski. From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxNZg1WyeVI.

Cross-Functional Collaboration and the Wannabe PMP

Catalan castellers collaborate, working together with a shared goal. By Eric Sala & Tània García (uploaded to Commons by Baggio) – https://web.archive.org/web/20070529054035/http://www.nooficial.com/index.php, CC BY-SA 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1115767

Whether you’re an employee or a sole proprietor, at some point you’re going to have to play well with others to get things done.

Bredemarket has performed this (fancy phrase: “cross-functional collaboration”), both as part of Bredemarket’s services and outside of it.

  • As an employee, I’ve managed SaaS proposal projects and other projects that needed the input of many.
  • Within Bredemarket, I’ve managed proposal and other projects of similar complexity.

Even though I’m not formally certified to do this, I do it anyway.

Pre-Bredemarket: I get SaaSy

Long before I started Bredemarket, I was managing products and proposals associated with an on-premise technology solution.

This solution had a long sales cycle (longer than Cloudflare’s, for example) and a long implementation time. After contract signature, it might take a year or more to lock down the requirements, procure the hardware and third-party software, configure the solution, perform a factory acceptance test, deliver the solution to the customer’s premises, perform one or more rounds of on-site testing, and obtain final acceptance.

But my employer wasn’t lacking in revenue during implementation, because it received partial payments as it passed various milestones. Perhaps a small percentage of the total price would be paid upon requirements completion. Another percentage at delivery. Additional percentages at different points in the implementation, with the final large payment upon acceptance.

By Sam Johnston – Created by Sam Johnston using OminGroup’s OmniGraffle and Inkscape (includes Building icon.svg by Kenny sh), CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6089457

But then I was the proposal manager for a prospect desiring a SaaS implementation.

  • The Request for Proposal (RFP) made it very clear that the prospect would not pay a dime to the successful bidder until AFTER the system was accepted and in productive use. Because that’s how SaaS implementations work.
From Regiondo, https://pro.regiondo.com/blog/saas-vs-on-premise/. Note the difference in set-up costs (for the purchasser) between the on-premise and SaaS models.
  • This would have a major financial impact on my employer, since it would take a much longer time to recoup the initial costs of the implementation.
  • Without going into details…we didn’t, um, “win” the bid.

Several years later, the, um, SITUATION had changed, and my employer was more willing to accept the financial risks associated with SaaS implementations. I was still a proposal manager at the time and was able to work on my employer’s first successful SaaS bids. But that assumption of risk wasn’t the only barrier to success, because I had to work with a lot of different cross-functional collaborators to get those bids out.

  • The salespeople who wants to sell the SaaS systems to their prospects.
  • The engineers who had to do the heavy lifting to transition our on-premise solution to a SaaS solution.
  • The program managers who had to keep an eye on the costs of the implementation to ensure that our employer’s financial risk was minimized.
  • The customer support people who had to manage the system after final acceptance, even though much of the system was in a cloud center somewhere instead of at the customer’s site.
  • The finance and pricing people who had to adjust to this new way of doing business.
  • The legal people who had to develop a brand new contract that encompassed the new reality.
  • Finally, the executives who were willing to take the risk to enter the SaaS market and who wanted to succeed without losing money.

I think this is when I made my observation about managers of large proposals. In a large project, the proposal manager is the only one who spends 100% of their time on the project. The salespeople are selling other deals, the engineers are engineering other stuff, and so forth. Therefore, it was up to me to ensure that everything continued to move forward, because while these bids were important to the others, they were critically important to me.

Anyway, these later bids had a much happier ending, the employer successfully entered the SaaS market, and as more customers moved from on-premise to SaaS models, thus evening out my employer’s income stream, the financial risk from SaaS proposals was reduced significantly.

That cross-functional collaboration experience, exercised on these bids and in many other instances over the years, would be put to the test a few years later when I started Bredemarket.

Bredemarket: herding cats

From Fallon (not Jimmy) 2000 “Cat Herders” advertisement for EDS, https://www.fallon.com/cat-herder.

It’s one thing for a company employee to manage a project with a ton of people, none of whom report to you and most of whom outrank you.

It’s another thing when an outside contractor has to manage a project of inside employees.

One of my Bredemarket projects, which happened to be another proposal project, required me to do just that. While the proposal was much simpler than the bids constructed at my former employer, the effort still required a lot of shepherding to get all the pieces put together, obtain all the approvals, and get someone to submit the final proposal since I, as a non-employee, couldn’t do it myself.

Everything worked out, and the employees were great, but there were times when it seemed like I was the only one to keep an eye on all the tasks.

Something that I had never been formally trained to do.

Today’s acronym is PMP

Eventually I (temporarily) stopped working on finger/face projects for Bredemarket because I was employed by a finger/face company. And I found myself managing projects of similar complexity (the 80+ battlecard project, for example).

And that’s when I realized that I was a de facto project manager.

Even though I didn’t have the fancy certification to attest to this.

The Project Management Institute offers several certifications, including:

I toyed around with the idea of starting the certification progression in 2023, and even though my employer didn’t have the rigorous annual goal-setting processes that larger organizations have, I set a personal goal in one of my employer’s Asana projects to advance to CAPM by the end of 2023.

And then…things happened.

Perhaps at some point I’ll get the official piece of paper that I can flash around, but until then I’ll learn on my own, both by coursework and by…well…actual managing projects.

Even Apple is moving to a service model. Biometric identity vendors are moving also.

Remember when you bought a big old hunk of hardware…and you owned it?

With cloud computing, significant portions of hardware were no longer owned by companies and people, but were instead provided as a service. And the companies moved from getting revenue from selling physical items to getting revenue from selling services.

From Apple Computer to Apple

Apple is one of those companies, as its formal name change from “Apple Computer” signifies.

Then “Apple Computer” circa 1978. From https://www.macrumors.com/2020/03/23/apple-computer-retail-sign/. Fair use.

Yet even as iTunes and “the” App Store become more prominent, Apple still made a mint out of selling new smartphone hardware to users as frequently as possible.

But Apple is making a change later in 2021, and Adrian Kingsley-Hughes noted the significance of that change.

The change?

So, it turns out that come the release of iOS 15 (and iPadOS 15) later this year, users will get a choice.

Quite an important choice.

iPhone users can choose to hit the update button and go down the iOS 15 route, or play it safe and stick with iOS 14.

Why is Apple supporting older hardware?

So Apple is no longer encouraging users to dump their old phones to keep up with new operating systems like the forthcoming iOS 15?

There’s a reason.

By sticking with iOS 14, iPhone users will continue to get security updates, which keeps their devices safe, and Apple gets to keep those users in the ecosystem.

They can continue to buy content and apps and pay for services such as iCloud.

Although Kingsley-Hughes doesn’t explicitly say it, there is a real danger when you force users to abandon your current product and choose another. (Trust me; I know this can happen.)

In Apple’s case, the danger is that the users could instead adopt a SAMSUNG product.

And these days, that not only means that you lose the sale of the hardware, but you also lose the sale of the services.

It’s important for Apple to support old hardware and retain the service revenue, because not only is its services business growing, but services are more profitable than hardware.

In the fiscal year 2019, Apple’s services business posted gross margins of 63.7%, approaching double the 32.2% gross margin of the company’s product sector. 

If current trends continue, Apple’s services (iCloud, Apple Music, AppleCare, Apple Card, Apple TV+, etc.) will continue to become relatively more important to the company.

The biometric identity industry is moving to a service model also

Incidentally, we’re seeing this in other industries, for example as the biometric identity industry also moves from an on-premise model to a software as a service (SaaS) model. One benefit of cloud-based hosting of biometric identity services is that both software and the underlying hardware can be easily upgraded without having to go to a site, deploying a brand new set of hardware, transferring the data from one set of hardware to the other, and hauling away the old hardware. Instead, all of those activities take place at Amazon, Microsoft, or other data centers with little or no on-premise fuss.

(And, as an added benefit, it’s easier for biometric vendors to keep their current customers because obsolescence becomes less of an issue.)

Is your biometric identity company ready to sell SaaS solutions?

But perhaps your company is just beginning to navigate from on-premise to SaaS. I’ve been through that myself, and can contract with you to provide advice and content. I can wear my biometric content marketing expert hat, or my biometric proposal writing expert hat as needed.

The “T” stands for technology. Or something. By Elred at English Wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by Moe_Epsilon., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=3812206

Obviously this involves more than just saying “we’re cloud-ready.” Customers don’t care if you’re cloud-ready. Customers only care about the benefits that being cloud-ready provides. And I can help communicate those benefits.

If I can help you communicate the benefits of a cloud-ready biometric identity system, contact me (email, phone message, online form, appointment for a content needs assessment, even snail mail).