Oh, and one more thing.
If in 1969 I was creating videos about a 1993 standard issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (an agency that didn’t exist under that name in 1969)…
…I must have been a genius little boy.
Identity/biometrics/technology marketing and writing services
Oh, and one more thing.
If in 1969 I was creating videos about a 1993 standard issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (an agency that didn’t exist under that name in 1969)…
…I must have been a genius little boy.
Back in July 1969, American astronauts walked on the moon.
And I posted on TikTok.
Perhaps not.
As you can discern, I posted that video on TikTok in 2024. And I also posted it here.
By the way, I’ll have more serious comments about Chinese companies and fingerprints later.
(Part of the biometric product marketing expert series)
If you follow the Bredemarket blog, you know that it is populated by iguanas, wildebeests, and wombats.
None of which have fingerprints, which are restricted to primates…mostly.
It turns out that the wombat’s close relative, the koala, DOES have fingerprints.
Why?
Convergent evolution, which happens when unrelated animals (in this case primates and koalas) evolve identically in response to similar evolutionary pressures.
“Koalas are famously picky eaters who seek out eucalyptus leaves of a specific age. And…koalas may also need to grasp in similar ways to humans….
“The friction and sensitivity fingerprints afford may help them simultaneously hang onto trees and do the delicate work of picking particular leaves and discarding others—but hopefully not near a crime scene.”
(Imagen 4)
(Part of the biometric product marketing expert series)
Because many of the subscribers and followers of my Substack page aren’t fingerprint experts (although a few are), my posts on Substack tend to be more introductory. So I wrote this for Substack, but also decided to share it on the Bredemarket blog at some point.
So let’s define what fingerprint minutiae are.
To do this, look at the tip of one of the fingers on your hand…but not too closely. (Or just Level 2, not Level 3.)
If you look sort of closely at your fingertip, you see one commonality between (most) fingers and Ruffles: both have ridges. For purposes of this exercise, take a close look at where the ridges go.
The important things is that you can identify the specific point at which a ridge ending occurs. And you can identify the specific point of a bifurcation, where a ridge splits into two ridges. (If a ridge splits into three, that’s a trifurcation.)
Those ridge ending and bifurcation points? Those are the minutiae.
Human fingerprint examiners can identify these minutiae points.
So can the algorithms on an automated fingerprint identification system (AFIS) or an automated biometric identification system (ABIS).
And if two fingers have minutiae in the same locations, and don’t have minutiae in one finger that are not present on the other finger…then they’re the same finger. (I’m simplifying here, since the quality of the prints and the way the skin bends affect the ability to find minutiae.)
Which means that if the police find a fingerprint on a stolen car that doesn’t belong to the owner…
…and the minutiae on your finger match the minutiae on the print from the car…
…you’d better have a good lawyer.
Oh, and one more thing: you also have ridges, ridge endings, and bifurcations on your palms and toes. So don’t try to steal a car while barefoot.
(Imagen 4)
(Part of the biometric product marketing expert series)
Some don’t believe that geolocation is a valid factor of identity/verification/authentication.
Some do.
If you ignore what Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye et al said about the validity of 12 fingerprint minutiae points in their 2013 study (cited in phys.org), their conclusions about cell phone locations deserve consideration.
“By analyzing 15 months of cell phone mobility data from 1.5 million people, researchers have found that only four spatio-temporal points (an individual’s approximate whereabouts at the approximate time when they’re using their cell phone) are all that’s needed to uniquely identify 95% of the individuals.”
Why?
“[T]he researchers’ data shows that just four spatio-temporal points are needed to uniquely identify the mobility trace of an individual. In other words, it’s not likely that someone else will be in the same locations as you are at four different times of day.”
And once you perform multi-factor authentication by combining geolocation with another factor, such as an address or a social media post, privacy disappears.
And now a word from our sponsor.
Imagen 4 tried to generate this picture, but even with my second prompt attempt (below) it didn’t understand what an FBI tenprint card was.
I couldn’t get Walter Cronkite in there either, so I settled for a generic newsman.
My prompt:
Please generate a realistic picture of a 1975 television show called The Amazing Computer. The picture shows an FBI fingerprint card with ten rolled inked prints and four slap prints sitting on a gargantuan flatbed scanner. A newsman is talking about the technology.
For the real (not fictional) story, read what Dorothy Bullard wrote.
(Part of the biometric product marketing expert series)
There is a lot of discussion about identity verification for people working in certain jobs: police officers, teachers, financial professionals, and the like.
With one exception.
One job that isn’t frequently discussed in the identity verification world is that of a sex worker. Primarily because sex workers usually don’t undergo identity verification for employment, but identity checks for criminal proceedings.
With a few exceptions.
In portions of Nevada sex work is legal. But it is heavily regulated. So there are laws in places like Carlin, Nevada that govern prostitute registration and work cards. Among other things:
Presumably the fingerprints are searched against law enforcement databases, just like the fingerprints of school teachers and the other newer professions.
Why?
“The chief of police shall investigate, through all available means, the accuracy of all information supplied by the prostitute on the registration form.”
Included in the investigation:
As you can see, the identity verification requirements for sex workers are adapted to meet the needs of that particular position.
But…it takes two to tango.
Brothel clients need to be at least 18 years old.
But I don’t know if Nevada requires client age verification, or if age estimation is acceptable.
(Imagen 4)
Posted on my free Substack account: https://open.substack.com/pub/johnebredehoft/p/friction-ridge-isnt-a-western-movie
(Wildebeest hoofprint contactless capture via Imagen 3)
(Part of the biometric product marketing expert series)
I can’t tell you why, but I’m performing some intensive research on contactless fingerprint capture. This is a topic I addressed here in 2021 and again in 2022.
As part of my research, I ran across a more recent white paper issued by the Institute for Defense and Government Advancement.
The white paper is entitled “Contactless: The Next Step in Fingerprinting Technology.”
Before I downloaded the white paper, I saw the author: Kaustubh Deshpande.
Kaustubh Deshpande? know that guy. We worked together at MorphoTrak and IDEMIA for a decade.
In fact, the IDGA page lists Deshpande’s IDEMIA affiliation.
Although by the time the paper was published on the IDGA website on February 10, 2025, Deshpande had already left IDEMIA to accept a position at HID.
Everything must change.
Nowadays, everybody wanna say that they got big TED talks
But nothin’ comes out when they press their fingers
Just a bunch of gibberish
And CSIs act like they forgot about Faulds
And my N. P. E. Bredemarket Instagram metabot forgot too.
But at least he didn’t cite Gabe Guo.
And I don’t have a rap career.