Driver’s License Data and Third Party Risk Management

It gets real tomorrow, with the enforcement date (sort of) for REAL ID at federal installations and airports. But what about the privacy of the data behind REAL IDs?

Bela Kumar of Jumio Corporation was recently interviewed by CNBC for an article about REAL ID and the data sharing behind it.

As can be expected, some people are very concerned about what this means.

“[C]oncerns persist among privacy professionals that the next step will be a federal database of driver’s license information, which is bad from a privacy and cybersecurity standpoint, said Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst with the American Civil Liberties Union.

“‘The more information the government has, the more the government might use that information,’ said Jodi Daniels, founder and chief executive of Red Clover Advisors, a privacy consulting company. ‘But that’s not what’s happening now,’ she added.”

Kumar addressed what IS happening now, and whether our personally identifiable information (PII) is protected.

“States have been issuing driver’s licenses for many years, and personal information is already being stored. The expectation is that the same controls apply to Real ID, said Bala Kumar, chief product and technology officer at Jumio, an online mobile payment and identity verification company. ‘States have already been managing this for many years,’ Kumar said.”

If you continue to read the article, you’ll also see a statement from the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators that echoes what Jumio said.

But as a former IDEMIA employee, my curiosity was piqued.

Has anyone ever gained unauthorized access to a state driver’s license database?

So I checked, and could not find an example of unauthorized access to a state driver’s license database.

But I DID find an example of unauthorized access to driver’s license DATA that was processed by a third party. The State of Louisiana issued a notice that included the following:

“On May 31, 2023, Progress Software Corporation, which developed and supports the MOVEIt managed file transfer platform, notified all customers across the globe, including [Louisiana Office of Motor Vehicles], of a zero-day vulnerability that an unauthorized party leveraged to access and acquire data without authorization. Upon learning of the incident, immediate measures were taken to secure the MOVEIt environment utilized to transfer files. A thorough investigation was conducted, and it was determined that there was unauthorized acquisition of and access to OMV files in the MOVEIt environment….

“The information varied by individual but included name and one or more of the following: address, date of birth, Social Security number, driver’s license, learner’s permit, or identification card number, height, eye color, vehicle registration information, and handicap placard information.”

Well, at least the hacked data didn’t include weight. Or claimed weight.

Cybersecurity professionals know that you cannot completely prevent these hacks. Which explains the “risk” in third party risk management. Progress Software has been around for a long time; I worked with Progress Software BEFORE I began my biometric career. But these hacks (in this case, CVE-2023-34362 as documented by CISA) can happen to anyone.

Be cautious, and remember that others with good intentions might not be cautious enough.

CVE 2026

As I mentioned earlier, funding for the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures program was extended. The details:

“The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency said that Mitre, which has run the CVE Program since its launch in 1999, can continue to do so until early March 2026. 

“This is a temporary solution. Clearly, the U.S. government wants to get rid of CISA paying for the CVE program. Someone else needs to seize the funding and governance reigns, and the opportunity to do so allows for creating a less U.S.-centric endeavor.”

If a new funding mechanism can ensure technical program continuity—while at the same time providing the $30 million business continuity by shielding the program from the chaotic whims of one country and one person—then this could be a long term solution.

The cybersecurity ecosystem has a little over 10 months to figure out how to fund the CVE program beginning in 2026.

Which means that nothing of substance will get done for the next 9 months. (How’s that TikTok sale going?)

Well, maybe North Korea will volunteer to fund the program…

(Imagen 3)

May 1 is World Password Day

The KnowledgeFlow Cybersecurity Foundation reminds us that the Upland Amazon Fresh grand opening isn’t the only big event this Thursday.

“World Password Day occurs on the first Thursday in May each year. It’s a day dedicated to raising awareness about the importance of password security and promoting good password practices to enhance your online security.”

And even if you belong to the “passwords are dead” movement, you’d better celebrate anyway because passwords will remain longer than you think.

(Imagen 3)

Hacking the May 7 Papal Conclave

This past weekend the world watched the funeral of Pope Francis.

Which means that the time has come to select a new Pope. The conclave for this purpose will begin on May 7.

The papal conclaves that convene to select a new Pope are notorious for their secrecy. The Cardinals who select the new Pope are locked away and generally cannot communicate with the outside world. With one exception: black smoke appears if a vote does not result in the election of a Pope, or white smoke if a Pope is elected.

Because the selection of a Pope has massive influence on both religious and secular affairs worldwide, there are those who desire to hack the papal conclave to get inside information.

Which is why the Vatican employs a cybersecurity expert.

“[I]n in October 2019…the Vatican appointed Gianluca Gauzzi Broccoletti as its Director of Security Services.

“Broccoletti brought robust and vigorous experience from previous roles in Italian law enforcement and cybersecurity. 

“Under his leadership, the team modernized the Papacy’s setup, with a strong emphasis on AI-powered threat analysis and digital forensics.”

Broccoletti and his staff employ a wide variety of cybersecurity techniques, including phone bans, security cameras, signal jammers, endpoint monitoring, and armed guards.

But this is the first papal conclave conducted under Broccoletti’s watch.

Will he maintain the secrecy of the ballot?

And if you offer a cybersecurity solution, how will your prospects learn about it?

Bredemarket can help:

  • compelling content creation
  • winning proposal development
  • actionable analysis

Book a call: https://bredemarket.com/cpa/ 

(Imagen 3)

Why Replacing Your Employees with VLM NPE Bots Won’t Defeat Social Engineering

(Scammed bot finger picture from Imagen 3)

Your cybersecurity firm can provide the most amazing protection software to your clients, and the clients still won’t be safe.

Why not? Because of the human element. All it takes is one half-asleep employee to answer that “We received your $3,495 payment” email. Then all your protections go for naught.

The solution is simple: eliminate the humans.

Eliminating the human element

Companies are replacing humans with bots for other rea$on$. But an added benefit is that when you bring in the non-person entities (NPEs) who are never tired and never emotional, social engineering is no longer effective. Right?

Well, you can social engineer the bot NPEs also.

Birthday MINJA

Last month I wrote a post entitled “An ‘Injection’ Attack That Doesn’t Bypass Standard Channels?” It discussed a technique known as a memory injection attack (MINJA). In the post I was able to sort of (danged quotes!) get an LLM to say that Donald Trump was born on February 22, 1732.

(Image from a Google Gemini prompt and response)

Fooling vision-language models

But there are more serious instances in which bots can be fooled, according to Ben Dickson.

“Visual agents that understand graphical user interfaces and perform actions are becoming frontiers of competition in the AI arms race….

“These agents use vision-language models (VLMs) to interpret graphical user interfaces (GUI) like web pages or screenshots. Given a user request, the agent parses the visual information, locates the relevant elements on the page, and takes actions like clicking buttons or filling forms.”

Clicking buttons seems safe…until you realize that some buttons are so obviously scambait that most humans are smart enough NOT to click on them.

What about the NPE bots?

“They carefully designed and positioned adversarial pop-ups on web pages and tested their effects on several frontier VLMs, including different variants of GPT-4, Gemini, and Claude.

“The results of the experiments show that all tested models were highly susceptible to the adversarial pop-ups, with attack success rates (ASR) exceeding 80% on some tests.”

Educating your users

Your cybersecurity firm needs to educate. You need to warn humans about social engineering. And you need to warn AI masters that bots can also be social engineered.

But what if you can’t? What if your resources are already stretched thin?

If you need help with your cybersecurity product marketing, Bredemarket has an opening for a cybersecurity  client. I can offer

  • compelling content creation
  • winning proposal development
  • actionable analysis

If Bredemarket can help your stretched staff, book a free meeting with me: https://bredemarket.com/cpa/

Now I’m Just Playing with Google Gemini

I asked Imagen 3 to help me illustrate nth party risk management.

Where you are connected with everyone to whom your connections are connected.

But I wanted to illustrate third-party risk management in a clean way. Back when AIDS became a sad feature of our lives in the 1980s, the description of how it spread from person to person could get a little graphic.

Why Does TPRM Fail? Not Because of the TPRM Software Providers.

For years I have maintained that the difficulties in technology are not because of the technology itself.

Technology can do wonderful things.

The difficulties lie with the need for people to agree to use the technology.

And not beg ignorance by saying “I know nothing.”

(Image of actor John Banner as Sgt. Schultz on Hogan’s Heroes is public domain.)

Case in point

I just saw an article with the title “TPRM weaknesses emerge as relationship owners fail to report red flags.

Unlike some clickbait-like article titles, this one from Communications Today succinctly encapsulates the problem up front.

It’s not that the TPRM software is failing to find the red flags. Oh, it finds them!

But the folks at Gartner discovered something:

“A Gartner survey of approximately 900 third-party relationship owners…revealed that while 95% saw a third-party red flag in the past 12 months, only around half of them escalate it to compliance teams.”

Among other things, the relationship owners worry about “the perceived return on investment (ROI) of sharing information.”

And that’s not a software issue. It’s a process issue.

wildebeests on a stairway, young to old, with the oldest wildebeest possessing a trophy
Wildebeest maturity model via Imagen 3.

No amount of coding or AI can fix that.

And this is not unique to the cybersecurity world. Let’s look at facial recognition.

Another case in point

I’ve said this over and over, but for U.S. criminal purposes, facial recognition results should ONLY be used as investigative leads.

It doesn’t matter whether they’re automated results, or if they have been reviewed by a trained forensic face examiner. 

Facial recognition results should only be used as investigative leads.

Sorry for the repetition, but some people aren’t listening.

But it’s not the facial recognition vendors. Bredemarket has worked with numerous facial recognition vendors over the years, and of those who work with law enforcement, ALL of them have emphatically insisted that their software results should only be used as investigative leads.

All of them. Including…that one.

But the vendors have no way to control the actions of customers who feed poor-quality data into their systems, get a result…and immediately run out and get an arrest warrant without collecting corroborating evidence.

And that’s not a software issue. It’s a process issue.

No amount of coding or AI can fix that.

I hope the TPRM folks don’t mind my detour into biometrics, but there’s a good reason for it.

Product marketing for TPRM and facial recognition

Some product marketers, including myself, believe that it’s not enough to educate prospects and customers about your product. You also need to educate them about proper use of the product, including legal and ethical concerns.

If you don’t, your customers will do dumb things in Europe, Illinois, or elsewhere—and blame you when they are caught.

Illinois, land of BIPA. I mean Lincoln.

Be a leader in your industry by doing or saying the right thing.

And now here’s a word from our sponsor.

Not the “CPA” guy again…

Bredemarket has openings

There’s a reason why this post specifically focused on cybersecurity and facial recognition.

If you need product marketing assistance with your product, Bredemarket has two openings. One for a cybersecurity client, and one for a facial recognition client. 

I can offer

  • compelling content creation
  • winning proposal development
  • actionable analysis

If Bredemarket can help your stretched staff, book a free meeting with me: https://bredemarket.com/cpa/

Bredemarket has openings. Imagen 3 again.

The Military, Cyberattacks, and Maturity

Everyone knows that cyberattacks don’t just target private organizations. They also target governments, particularly aiming for agencies that either deal with a lot of money (unemployment agencies) or contribute to defending a country (military, homeland security).

The Chief Information Officer of the U.S. Department of Defense has a vested interest in preventing cyberattacks, not only against DoD, but against its third-party suppliers, which are the subject of today’s acronym, DIB (defense industrial base).

And if you’ve followed along in the Bredemarket blog lately, you know that a key component of preventing cyberattacks is raising your organization’s process maturity in the cybersecurity realm.

And yes, there’s a maturity model and a certification for that, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, or CMMC.

Cybersecurity is a top priority for the Department of Defense (DoD). The defense industrial base (DIB) faces increasingly frequent, and complex cyberattacks. To strengthen DIB cybersecurity and better safeguard DoD information, the DoD developed the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Program to assess existing DoD cybersecurity requirements.

It’s no surprise that the CMMC incorporates multiple levels, in this case three of them.

  • Level 1: Basic Safeguarding of FCI (Federal Contract Information)
  • Level 2: Broad Protection of CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)
  • Level 3: Higher-Level Protection of CUI Against Advanced Persistent Threats

And not only is there a maturity model certification for the defense industrial base, but there’s a conference to help everyone out. After all the geeks celebrate May the Fourth Be With You day, some of the geeks will continue to celebrate on May 5, the date of the fifth annual CMMC Day. Party on.

Also see Biometric Update’s article, as well as NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 3, Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations.

And if you need product marketing assistance with your cybersecurity product, Bredemarket has an opening for a cybersecurity client and can help with compelling content creation, winning proposal development, and actionable analysis. Book a call: https://bredemarket.com/cpa/ 

(Military wildebeest image from Imagen 3)

Startups Entering the Wonderful World of Process

I’ve talked about governance and maturity models before in regards to cybersecurity. The complicating factor is that companies with little process maturity are flung into the world of standards and auditors. 

For example, I was not initially part of the process team when the former seat-of-the-pants Printrak had to play CMM catch up with our new corporate overlord Motorola. But it was a bruising experience.

These days you have a lot of startups, not owned by multinationals, that are required by large customers and governments to comply with some standard or another. Winging it is not an option; winging it is failure. Or, in process-speak, winging it can result in a high statistical probability of a large number of adverse  findings.

Vanta wants to help.

Its early April “Guide to working with auditors: Best practices for startups” contains several suggestions. 

  • One is to engage with auditors early so that you become familiar with each other.
  • However, you should NOT give auditors access to your data early. Wait until you are ready. Assuming your data is in a Vanta instance:

“If you’re still finalizing controls in Vanta, granting early access could cause confusion. However, some firms prefer early access for familiarization—as long as they don’t start testing prematurely.”

Vanta’s guide is at https://www.vanta.com/resources/guide-to-working-with-auditors-for-startups

(Wombat image via Imagen 3)

PS to cybersecurity product marketers

Are you getting YOUR product’s message out? Or is a stretched team holding you back from creating stellar marketing materials? 

Bredemarket has an opening for a cybersecurity client and can help with compelling content creation, winning proposal development, and actionable analysis. Book a call: https://bredemarket.com/cpa/