Identity/biometrics/technology marketing and writing services
If you’re wearing gloves, a biometric system can’t capture your fingerprints.
If you’re looking away from the camera, a biometric system can’t capture your face.
These are extreme examples of “failure to acquire,” but some systems don’t even account for these cases.
We commonly believe that modern people enjoy an abundance of data that historical people did not have. While this is often true, sometimes it isn’t.
Let’s look at the images we use in facial recognition.
ISO/IEC 19794-5 (Face image data) recommends a minimum inter-eye distance of 90 pixels.
But imagine for the moment that facial recognition existed 100 years ago. Could century-old film cameras achieve the necessary resolution to process faces on adding machines or whatever?
The answer is yes. Easily.
Back in the Roaring ‘20s, photographs of course were not digital images, but were captured and stored on film. During the 1920s a new film standard, 35mm film, was starting to emerge. And if you translate the “grains” in film to modern pixels, your facial image resolution is more than sufficient.
Here is what FilmFix says:
“Thirty-five-millimeter film has a digital resolution equivalent to approximately 5.6K — a digital image size of about 5,600 × 3,620 pixels.”
Yeah, that will work—considering that the Google Gemini image illustrating this post was generated at only 1,024 x 1,024 pixels.
Bredemarket